Resumen
Gas hydrates are likely to become an important strategic resource with commercial development prospects. It is therefore of great significance to realize the long-term and efficient production of methane hydrate reservoirs. Previous studies have shown that the lithological characteristics of hydrate reservoirs have a significant impact on reservoir productivity by influencing the evolution of seepage parameters in the process of hydrate production. The porosity (F) and initial hydrate saturation (SH) affect the amount of hydrate decomposition and pressure transfer, and also indirectly affect the reservoir temperature field. The permeability (k) directly affects the rate of pressure-drop transmission and methane gas discharge. Due to the differences in seepage parameters caused by different reservoir lithology, a sandy hydrate reservoir (SHR) in Japan and a clayey silt hydrate reservoir (CHR) in China were found to have different gas production rates and the spatial evolution characteristics of the temperature and pressure fields varied in gas hydrate production tests. Therefore, to ensure the long-term and efficient production of the CHR in China, two models were established for a comparative analysis based on a numerical simulation. The two models were depressurizing models of the CHR of the W11 drilling site in the Shenhu Sea area of the South China Sea and the SHR of the AT1 drilling site in the Eastern Nankai Trough of Japan. Both models considered the heterogeneity of seepage parameters, and the TOUGH+HYDARATE (T+H) code was used in subsequent calculations. Four key results were obtained: (a) The order of the significance levels of the lithological parameters on productivity was k > SH > F in the CHR and SH > k > F in the SHR. (b) The heat conduction and heat convection in the CHR were weaker than in the SHR, which made it difficult to recover the low-temperature area caused by hydrate decomposition. (c) The exploitation of a high k hydrate reservoir should be given priority when the other initial conditions were the same in both the CHR and SHR. (d) The exploitation of both the CHR and SHR should not only rely on the hydrate content or seepage capacity to determine the reservoir exploitation potential, but the combined effect of the two parameters should be fully considered.