Resumen
Whilst numerical modelling is commonly used for simulation to check the design of water conveyance, sluicing and spillway structure design, the numerical modelling has rarely been compared with the physical model tests. The objective of this research presented in this paper was to examine the validity and suitability of the numerical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling method within an ANSYS Fluent/CFD R 18.2 software and compare its results with a fully instrumented and well-run physical model test at the 1:45 scale, carried out for Patrind Hydropower Project located in Pakistan. The physical model test was conducted for confirmation and optimization of a natural de-sanding basin, and diversion of suspended sediment-rich flood waters using a bypass tunnel. The numerical simulation was able to reproduce physical model test results and data gathered over a 7-year project operation to an acceptable level of accuracy. A detailed explanation of the approach used in numerical modelling together with analysis of simulation diagrams of ANSYS Fluent/CFD is also presented. The research shows that a 3D numerical model with accurate boundary conditions and mesh size can replace the need for physical model tests.