ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Multi-level policy tensions in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) development in low-income Asian cities

Suryani Wijaya    
Muhammad Imran    
Jeffrey McNeill    

Resumen

International development agencies, with the help of the central government, support climate change sensitive transport policies in Low Income Asian (LIA) cities. These policies include building a state of art Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in medium-sized LIA cities, including Bandung and Surabaya in Indonesia. However, the selection of BRT over indigenous modes of mobility is creating socio-political tensions at the local level. This paper uses multi-level governance as a theoretical lens to examine the relations between and distribution of power among actors in BRT investment decisions in Bandung and Surabaya within the hierarchy of national regional and local governments, international development organisations, community sector and traditional transport providers creating these tensions. It reports on fieldwork conducted in Bandung and Surabaya in 2013 including interviews with policy makers, politicians, and a range of stakeholders. The field work found that the BRT project in Bandung and Surabaya was advanced by the central government with the help of international NGOs and development organisations as the low cost green alternative to reduce traffic congestion and GHGs emission in these cities. ?Go-green? campaign of central government and international development organisations made it possible for Bandung and Surabaya City government to accept BRT over traditional Angkot and regular bus modes. However, BRT project in both cities get strong opposition from social and political actors within the community, particularly from the Angkot/minibuses operators? association. National and provincial policies were modified by Bandung in response to local pressure and BRT is limited to two peri-urban corridors that do not meet local needs. In contrast, Surabaya accepted BRT project and then turn it down due to political and social pressure appeared during the process. The research shows that local power and stakeholders are able to distort national and supranational policy-initiatives totally or in a way that while projects are delivered, they are of limited use to the local communities they intended to help.

 Artículos similares

       
 
William?s Daré, Jean-Philippe Venot, Christophe Le Page and Aaron Aduna    
This paper is a reflexive analysis of a three-year participatory water research project conducted in the Upper East Region (UER) of Ghana, whose explicit objective was to initiate a multi-level dialogue to support the national Integrated Water Resources ... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Michael Wegener, Klaus Spiekermann    
Urban and regional models have been developed for different policy fields at different levels of spatial and temporal resolution. But it has become apparent that policies interact across space and time and need to be modelled together. The first urban an... ver más

 
Usama Salama, Lina Yao and Hye-young Paik    
The presence of the Internet of Things (IoT) in healthcare through the use of mobile medical applications and wearable devices allows patients to capture their healthcare data and enables healthcare professionals to be up-to-date with a patient?s status.... ver más
Revista: Informatics

 
Stephen Roll, Stephanie Moulton, Jodi Sandfort     Pág. 3 - 22
Increased pressure for evidence-based practices in policymaking and administration has led to the growth of a new research stream of implementation science. Little is known about how this new stream of research compares with scholarship on policy impleme... ver más

 
Paul Burton    
There are many calls for urban planning in Australia to be reformed, although often in contradictory ways. For example, some argue it should be capable of delivering greater certainty to developers while others call for more flexibility in processes of u... ver más
Revista: Urban Science