Inicio  /  Atmósfera  /  Vol: 28 Núm: 3 Par: 0 (2015)  /  Artículo
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

MEXICO'S CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL RADIATIVE FORCING BY MAJOR ANTHROPOGENIC GREENHOUSE GASES: CO2, CH4 AND N2O

Víctor Manuel Mendoza Castro    
René Garduño    
Elba E. Villanueva    
Blanca Mendoza    

Resumen

The IPCC (2013) gives simplified formulas to compute the radiative forcing (RF) resulting from the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gases (AGG): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and halocarbons. These formulas allow to compute the global RF of these gases relative to their pre-industrial (1750 A.D.) concentrations, and are used in this work to estimate the contribution of Mexico to the global RF by its emissions of CO2 (the most significant of the AGG), CH4 and N2O during the period 1990-2011, which are reported in the Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero (National Inventory of Greenhouse Gases Emissions, INEGEI) (INECC, 2013). In comparison, by 2010 the national emissions per capita of Argentina, Spain and the United States were 108.8, 110.8 and 327.0% of the Mexican emissions, respectively, in units of equivalent CO2. Mexico?s CO2 emissions retained in the atmosphere during 1990-2011 amount to 4 624 457 Gg; they are higher than those of Spain and Argentina together, and represent 1/12 of the USA contribution. Mexico?s contribution is 1.47% of the global RF due to CO2, with a similar proportion than Spain and Argentina, but a smaller fraction compared to that of the USA (1/15). The main uncertainties of our computations for Mexico?s contribution to the global RF come from national emissions; the INEGEI indicates that the emissions considered for the calculation of uncertainties represent 89% of the total emissions of the inventory, resulting in a total uncertainty of ±5.6%. We are aware that, as a consequence, the concentration increase of CH4 and N2O due to Mexico?s emissions retained in the atmosphere during 1990-2011 is lower than their respective uncertainties for global concentrations: 1.72 vs. 2 ppbv and 0.13 vs. 1 ppbv.

 Artículos similares

       
 
Yan Zhang, Bingfei Chu, Tianming Huang, Shengwen Qi, Michael Manga, Huai Zhang, Bowen Zheng and Yuxin Zhou    
Carbon geological storage (CGS) is an important global practice implemented to mitigate the effects of CO2 emissions on temperature, climate, sea level, and biodiversity. The monitoring of CGS leakage and the impact of storage on hydrogeological properti... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Merideth Kelliher, Diana Bogueva and Dora Marinova    
Although Australia remains committed to the Paris Agreement and to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions, it was late in joining the 2021 Global Methane Pledge. Finding suitable methane (CH4) mitigation solutions for Australia?s livestock industry should... ver más
Revista: Climate

 
Shuling Zhao and Sishuo Zhao    
Due to the intensification of economic globalization and the impact of global warming, the development of methods to reduce shipping costs and reduce carbon emissions has become crucial. In this study, a multi-objective optimization algorithm was designe... ver más

 
Bingjie Ma, Yang Wang, Ping Jiang and Siyue Li    
Eutrophication is prevalent in urban lakes; however, a knowledge gap exists regarding eutrophication influences on carbon dynamics in these ecosystems. In the present study, we investigated the carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) concentration and dif... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Christian Bipongo Ndeke, Marco Adonis and Ali Almaktoof    
This paper presents an energy management strategy using a Stateflow controller related to DC microgrids with the important penetration of renewable energy. The increase in world electricity demand is one of the principal drivers of the exhaustion of foss... ver más
Revista: Applied Sciences