Next Article in Journal
Numerical Simulations and Experimental Study on the Reeling Process of Submarine Pipeline by R-Lay Method
Previous Article in Journal
Triads and Rogue Events for Internal Waves in Stratified Fluids with a Constant Buoyancy Frequency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Approaches for the Observation of Transient Phenomena in Critical Marine Environment

1
CNR—Institute of Marine Engineering, Via de Marini 6, 16149 Genoa, Italy
2
Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, UniFe, Via Saragat 1, 44122 Ferrara, Italy
3
Italian Hydrographic Institute, Passo dell’Osservatorio 4, 16134 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(6), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060578
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 22 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Environmental Science)

Abstract

:
This paper focuses on the development of new approaches to observe transient phenomena in critical marine environments using autonomous marine vehicles (AMVs) for the acquisition of physical and biogeochemical parameters of water and seabed characterization. The connection with metrological principles, together with the adoption of observing methodologies adjustable according to the specific marine environment being studied, allows researchers to obtain results that are reliable, reproducible, and comparable with those obtained through the classic monitoring methodologies. Tests were executed in dramatically dynamic, sensitive, and fragile areas, where the study and application of new methodologies is required to observe phenomena strongly localized in space and requiring very high resolutions, in time. Moreover, the harsh environmental conditions may present risks not only for the quality and quantity of the acquired data but also for the instrumentation and the operators. This is the case, for instance, in polar marine environments in proximity of tidal glaciers and in the Mediterranean Sea in areas characterized by seabed degassing activities, where AMV-supported monitoring procedures can allow for the safe observation of not repeatable and not completely predictable events.

1. Introduction

Oceans and marine ecosystems are key elements for life on Earth: they regulate the transportation and storage of carbon dioxide, control the climate, and absorb most of the heat excess from greenhouse gas emissions [1]. Nevertheless, global climate change is progressing rapidly, and geo-hazards, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and tsunamis, not only cause large losses of human life and have massive worldwide socioeconomic impacts, but also have disruptive impacts on environments. Enhancing marine environmental monitoring and prediction capabilities will increase our ability to respond adequately to major challenges and efficiently preserve both the environment and ecosystems. Understanding the functioning and assessing the status of the marine environment require the monitoring of multiple stressor impacts with a multi-parametric integration of observations [2]. There are specific parameters, such as sea surface temperature, sea level, ocean surface currents, near-surface wind, ocean color, and ocean stratification, but also other parameters, such as sea ice, water turbidity, pH, nutrients, and oxygen concentrations, which affect the distribution of marine species and the functioning of marine ecosystems [3,4,5]. For all these reasons, the scientific community has recently launched the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–2030). This aims to create a common framework for the sustainable development of the oceans, which should lead to an integrated system for science-based solutions. This will include building on existing technology and partnerships to “provide ocean science, data, and information to inform policy for a well-functioning ocean in support of all sustainable development goals of the Agenda 2030” and “to generate scientific knowledge and underpinning infrastructure and partnerships” [2,6]. Holistic marine environmental characterization is essential for data-driven decision making across the science and engineering aspects. The characterization of such complex oceanographic processes is more difficult compared to inland features because of the difficulty in obtaining observations from often remote and hazardous locations [7]. Due to the risk and difficult environment, more than 80% of the oceans are presently still unexplored and unmapped. Moreover, specific marine environment is characterized by the presence of transient phenomena, particular events that occur in very localized points in space and in time intervals that are very short. The transient character of these events is related to the fact that they are not repeatable and not completely predictable. Despite the obvious practical difficulties, there is considerable interest in the observation and identification of these phenomena, both from the point of view of marine sciences and for the possible consequences in terms of hazards they can generate. Traditional techniques of point sampling and observation in the environment do deliver high-information content, but they are expensive and often do not provide adequate spatial and temporal coverage, while remote sensing can provide cost-effective solutions as well as data for locations where there is no or only limited information but can also have insufficient time/space resolution [8]. In this context, novel technologies have an important role in making new solutions available: advances in ocean robotics, for example, and the combination of remote and in situ ocean observations offer new opportunities and reduce operational costs (European Marine Board, 2019). New sensors, platforms and monitoring strategies are required to address an increasing number of variables, in particular for the assessment of the status of the environment [2].
In this work we focus on transient phenomena that occur in dynamic, sensitive, and fragile areas, often difficult or impossible to reach due to the prohibitive environmental and climatic situations that make them critical and the traditional methods of observations inadequate. These distinctive features require the development of dedicated observation procedures, which on the one hand take into account the constraints imposed by the environment in which operations take place, and on the other hand are able to satisfy the requests in terms of spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy necessary to record these transient events. In parallel with the development of specific observation procedures, it is necessary to use instruments and tools that can overcome the limitations associated with traditional methods of observing critical marine environments. In this perspective, the use of autonomous robotic platforms characterized by ease of assembly and adaptability, equipped with instrumentation capable of operating even in demanding working conditions, is of fundamental importance.
The critical environmental conditions may present some risks for the data acquisition but can also constitute a limit from a metrological point of view: very often it is not possible to perform repeated measurements due to adverse conditions and therefore measurements referring to the observations of different phenomena are paired even if they are not directly comparable from a metrological point of view. In this context, it is essential to apply multidisciplinary and coordinated measurement procedures to gather data that have metrological traceability, thus ensuring compatibility [9].
In this paper two case studies are described: water mass stratification with possible presence of plume of meltwater from glaciers in Svalbard and seabed methane emissions in the Tyrrhenian sea. The critical conditions to which the measuring instruments are subject, the dangers to which operators may be exposed, and the constraints on data acquisition means operations in the two environments chosen as case studies are certainly different. Although each of the two environments has specific criticality linked to the particular working conditions, both are dynamic, sensitive, and fragile areas subject to the presence of transient phenomena strongly localized in space and time, not repeatable and not completely predictable, which require very high performance from the operators and instruments in terms of spatial and temporal resolution. For these reasons, the approach followed for the observation and study of these phenomena was common to both case studies: specific observation methodologies, using autonomous vehicles and procedures connected to the principles of metrology and adapted to the particular environment, give the possibility to achieve important results with high effectiveness, overcoming various practical difficulties.

1.1. Oceanographic Processes from Tidewater Glacier in Kongsfjorden (Svalbard)

The first case study concerns the complex and fragile Arctic environment, which includes specific processes for the study of the current state of our environment and its future evolution. To give better estimates of the future changes within a relatively short time, regions with a large natural climate gradient and where processes sensitive to the expected changes are particularly important should be studied [10,11]. Svalbard and the surrounding ocean areas fulfill all these criteria: they are located in a region with a very large climate gradient, being alternately influenced by cold central Arctic or mild marine climate conditions at time scales of weeks to years [12,13,14]. The processes that take place in this area should be studied considering the climatic and meteorological, geological, and geomorphological as well as oceanographic and sedimentological framework in which they are inserted. All these factors are fundamental to understand the processes taking place there. This environment, so important for its richness of phenomena, is however still characterized by a lack of data due to the numerous logistic difficulties in collecting them, increased by the severity of climatic and environmental conditions, typical of polar areas. This fact is especially true when considering the data to study oceanographic processes near the fronts of tidewater glaciers: in situ data are typically coming from moorings and casts adjacent to the glacier fronts [15,16,17]. However, these data, while essential to reconstruct the time series of the recorded variables, are related to a static point and therefore insufficient to characterize larger areas, especially the ones close to the glacier front and with high spatial resolutions not reachable even with satellite data.
In this work, the data collected allow us to concentrate on a very short time scale within which instantaneous and strongly localized in space phenomena occur but with consequences on the ecosystem of a fjord that also extends over longer time scales. These phenomena are related to the introduction of melt water from the tidewater glaciers present in the Kongsfjorden (Figure 1) and to the formation of plumes which, once they reach the surface of the water, mix with the water of the fjord. Through the analysis of specific variables, it is possible to identify the distribution of the water mass and the presence, at some points, of the meltwater plume coming from the glacier before the mixing with the fjord water. In addition to the water component due to the melting of the glacier, in the late spring period during which the tests were carried out (beginning of June 2018), there was also a component of water that originated outside the study area but which, due to the global dynamics of the ocean circulation, was pushed into the fjord itself. The two main water masses originating outside the study areas are the Atlantic water (AW) element of the West Spitsbergen Current (WSC) and Arctic water (ArW) of the coastal current. Both these currents flow northward along the west Spitsbergen margin, steered by the slope edge topography [18,19]. Recent years have been characterised by an increase in the temperature and frequency of warm AW incursions into west Spitsbergen fjords, alongside an increase in the temperature of the WSC [12]. In addition to the waters of external origin, different types of water originating inside the fjord can be also identified, as found in literature [12,14,19,20].

1.2. Shallow Seabed Gas Emissions in the Scoglio d’Affrica (Tyrrhenian Sea)

The second case study is related to the phenomena of seabed gas emissions taking place in the northern Tyrrhenian Sea (Figure 2). Despite the apparent diversity, the phenomena of water mass stratification with the possible presence of plume of meltwater from glaciers in Svalbard and seabed methane emissions in the Tyrrhenian sea are both events strongly localized in space and time, non-repeatable, and not completely predictable. These distinctive features require the development of dedicated observation procedures, which on the one hand take into account the constraints imposed by the environment in which operations take place, and on the other hand are able to satisfy requests in terms of spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy necessary to record these transient events. Seepage represents an important route of transport for methane (CH4) and other hydrocarbon gases from Earth’s subsurface to the oceans and the atmosphere. When CH4 comes in contact with seawater it provides energy to drive chemosynthetic microbial activity. Escaping CH4 can then contribute to the atmospheric CH4 pool where it acts as a strong greenhouse gas. Finding the locations of CH4 seepage, estimating its amount, tracing the origin of the CH4, and identifying abiotic vs. biotic processes occurring at CH4 seeps is therefore of fundamental importance for understanding the global carbon cycle and its interaction with the biosphere [21].
Cold gas emissions from the seabed characterize the area between the Scoglio d’Affrica, the island of Pianosa, and the island of Elba. Surveys to observe gas emissions in the area of the Scoglio d’Affrica were carried out by the Geological Service in the 1960s and 1970s and were described in [22]. These identified the presence of morphological terraces, structures affected by fault dislocations and structural lineations potentially capable of conveying deep fluids. Direct observations indicated a widespread and continuous degassing activity, and the gas was found to be mainly methane [23]. The seabed gas emissions in the area of the Scoglio d’Affrica have been studied since the 60s and recently they returned to great interest due to an episode that occurred in March 2017 when fishermen reported that an outburst of gas rose about 10 m near their boat. The phenomenon persisted for about 15 min and then decreased, transforming into emissions of “clear water” bubbles. After this episode, numerous data acquisition campaigns were carried out by various subjects (public and private research centers) interested in the study of the phenomena that occur in the area. One of the most recent scientific campaigns is the one coordinated in June 2019 by Italian Navy Hydrographic Office (IIM) in collaboration with the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV), the Institute of Marine Engineering (INM), Genoa of the CNR, University of Ferrara (UniFe), and University La Sapienza (Roma1) in order to continue the annual monitoring program already started in 2017.
In the following paragraphs, the combined use of newly designed robotic vehicles and of acquisition procedures specifically conceived to cope with the criticality of the operating environment are described.

2. Materials and Methods

Knowledge of the environment, also for the purpose of a correct management of resources to preserve the environment itself, is often limited by the ability of human beings to make complete observations in many locations due to the remoteness, the hardness, and the geographical extension of the oceanic environment. Furthermore, knowledge is often limited by the considerable extent of the time scales on which observations must be made and by the high demand in terms of spatial data resolution [24]. In this scenario, unmanned autonomous platforms are important tools to make the necessary observations possible. The application of these in situ observation capabilities must be performed comprehensively, integrated with other elements of an ocean observation system, including models and satellite remote sensing. The trend in recent decades has been to develop integrated observation systems, such as the Framework for Ocean Observing [25], which uses requirements drivers, technological maturity, and impact on society to identify essential ocean variables (EOV). Autonomous platforms already provide key observations for some EOVs. Further advances in autonomous systems are required to meet the growing ocean observation needs in different scientific fields like biology, biogeochemistry, and ecology as well as for seabed mapping, deep ocean exploration, and the growing needs for real-time data [26]. New observation technologies and techniques will advance our understanding particularly of transient events, such as harmful algal blooms [27], tsunamis, underwater volcanic eruptions, and gas hydrate plumes [28], which require better and faster observation techniques. While ship-based in situ observations offer great flexibility and are essential for the maintenance of buoys and casts observatories, they are increasingly limited by the cost of operations [29] and by insufficient temporal and spatial coverage. For all these reasons the trend in marine observations has been toward increasing the application of autonomous buoys, moorings, autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [30]: robotic systems are employed as fundamental data-gathering tools by scientists, allowing new perspectives and a greater understanding of the planet and its environmental processes, also taking advantage of the possibility to mount sets of tools on board for a complete characterization of the environment, even critical, with spatial and temporal resolutions not otherwise obtainable. A further and important step forward for autonomous vehicles (and for the entire observation of the marine environment) is to have significantly improved interoperability of sensors, systems, and data. The increased cooperation between the elements of the system was noted as an advantage of the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) [31]. Moreover, the use of standards and of best practices for observations make it easier to operate efficiently, share results, and exploit existing data, favoring the interoperability and reproducibility of the results obtained. Autonomous platforms already make observations over a wide range of time and space scales, measuring salinity, temperature, nitrate, pressure, oxygen, biomass, and many other parameters [26]. This means better comparability as well as lower uncertainty and a larger volume of high-quality stable standards and reference materials that meet the global demand for data quality. To reach higher effectiveness, it is essential to combine the expertise achieved in the individual, traditional fields of metrology into new interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary strategies to be developed and embraced also by national metrology institutes (NMI) [32]. Collaborations between communities are needed to develop improved measurement standards, to perform comparisons, and to establish metrological guidelines and operating procedures for observational networks [33].

2.1. The Environment as Driver of Technological Innovation and New Observation Methods

Risk mitigation and the necessity of collecting data not otherwise available consequently leads to the development of new technological solutions both in terms of autonomous vehicles and on-board instrumentation. They are the primary and fundamental aspects, but not the only ones to consider. The other major issue linked to the limitations and constraints given by the environment where the measuring operations take place is the methodologies according to which these observations are performed. These aspects are of fundamental importance for the Arctic area but can generally be used to develop an integrated system for observing the marine environment which, starting from the inputs (e.g., essential ocean variables) and the measurement needs, determines which tools and procedures to implement (observations and maintenance) in order to obtain the desired outputs (data and products). The process obviously provides feedback on what were the initial target inputs and therefore an iterative process is generated that gradually leads to improving the quality of the procedures and results [31].
The close link between the specific application, characterized by certain environmental constraints and specific outputs to be obtained and the development of technological tools and operating procedures to be implemented, is clear. Autonomous operations in hardly accessible areas, such as the polar regions or in hazardous areas, like the ones characterized by seabed gas outflows, require specific designs and ad hoc studied solutions. Usually, different requirements must be met, like for example providing an accurate assessment of conditions in a relatively short time, ensuring repeatability, high positioning precision, and a high degree in the control of the system. To satisfy all the numerous requests, sometimes in conflict with each other, it is necessary to mediate and find solutions that constitute the best compromise. To do this, it is necessary to develop research work that naturally leads to technological innovation and which in turn can improve the application from which the process originated. This approach, based on the application that drives research and leads to innovation, was applied in the design phases for the development of the autonomous vehicles described in the following paragraphs.

2.2. Innovative Surveys Strategies Using Autonomous Robotic Platforms in Critical Areas

The traditional approach to obtaining ocean measurements is costly, labor intensive, and provides limited data. Moreover, a deep understanding of the numerous processes connected to changes in the Arctic climate, sea ice, and ocean is needed for better forecasting models and improved risk assessment and is thus a key to improved safety and sustainability of all Arctic operations [34]. The innovative procedures of observing the Arctic environment can be defined as “data driven” as the choice on how to operate during the acquisition campaigns is dictated by the final data required and in turn linked to the information that is extracted from the data. The focus is therefore on the type of measurements that are made, on the phenomenon that is observed, and on the temporal and spatial scale required. The need to take a step forward compared to the methods traditionally used in order to contribute to fill the gap of data that still persists in the area facing the fronts of Arctic tidewater glaciers and the implementation of innovative observing procedures strongly connected with metrology and international standards leads to the employment of autonomous vehicles in our field campaigns. The connection with metrological principles is related to the multidisciplinary approach to measure key variables for environmental studies with high accuracy and resolution of measurements, comparability, stability, and coherence of the results. In this work, we focus on the observation of water column parameters, like temperature, salinity, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity, that are considered essential climate variables (ECV) and essential ocean variables. Observation procedures were planned to meet the requirements for ECV and EOV observations concerning resolution and uncertainty.
PROTEUS (Portable RObotic TEchnology for Unmanned Surveys) is a fully electric vehicle developed by CNR marine robotics researchers based on their experience in polar applications. [35,36]. It is characterized by its versatility and adaptability in order to be suitably modified according to the environmental constraints in which it operates: the prototype was designed and built as a portable (45–70 kg weight, 1.5 m long, 0.35–0.5 m wide, and 0.35–1.5 m high), highly modular, and reconfigurable vehicle and its open-frame torpedo-shaped structure is transformable into different kinds of autonomous marine vehicles (ROV—Remotely Operated Vehicle, USSV—Unmanned Semi-Submersible Vehicle, and AUV—Autonomous Underwater Vehicle) by adding or removing various modules. PROTEUS’s core can be operated as an ROV when tethered to a mothership. It can also be transformed into a USSV by removing the tether cable; adding a battery pack below the vehicle; installing on its top a module composed of foam, a GPS, and a radio communication system; and moving the vertical thrusters to a horizontal surge configuration. During the 2018 campaign, PROTEUS was mainly used in the USSV configuration, and it was equipped with different sensors, samplers, and tools (Figure 3).
The final goal in terms of space-time resolution of the data leads to the development of precise procedures for their acquisition: the operations carried out in the Kongsfjorden highlighted how the use of a robotic surface platform with the ability to perform profiles along the water column using a bunch of sensors allowed researchers to obtain data that were unique for their characteristics of accuracy, resolution, and precision, making it possible to study the physical and bio-optical properties of the water masses of the fjord in general and of the areas close to the tidal glacier front in particular, and thus capture particular processes of stratification of the waters inside the fjord that occur in these areas otherwise difficult or impossible to reach and observe. The choices of the specific variables to monitor is derived from the indications developed by international communities working on the definition of variables that are considered fundamental to characterize the climate system and its changes. In this work, we focus on specific parameters that are listed as essential climate variables defined by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) and in particular in some of the EOV defined by the GOOS. Salinity and temperature of seawater measured with depth, turbidity, and concentration of chlorophyll-a pigment in the water are variables also defined as “core data” in the Svalbard Integrated Observing System (SIOS). Moreover, the connection with the essential variable schemes can provide guidelines and criteria for the definition of requirements for temporal and spatial coverage for the different variables that can also depend on the specific scientific question to be answered [37].
The acquisitions were performed in the stretch of sea facing different glaciers of the Kongsfjorden (e.g., Blomstrandbreen, Kongsbreen, Kronebreen, and Conwaybreen), with the robot moving away from the glacier along paths almost perpendicular to the glacier fronts. During the 2018 campaign, data were collected not only on the surface but also along the water column to understand the complex phenomena that occur near the front of the glaciers. from an operational point of view, the first phase of data acquisition involved the approach of PROTEUS to the front of the glacier until it touched it. Once it reached this point, the vehicle was stopped and made sure that it maintained its position. The PROTEUS control system provides three main control modes to the pilot: Manual, semi-automatic, and automatic. In manual mode, the pilot can directly operate on motor thrusts and he/she is in charge to keep the desired heading, speed, etc. for the vehicle. In semi-automatic mode, the PROTEUS control system allows one to automatically follow references of heading (auto-heading), speed (auto-speed), etc. In automatic mode, the vehicle is completely autonomous and, for example, can autonomously reach and keep a desired GPS position [35]. While the vehicle was in position, measurements of biogeochemical and physical parameters along the water column were performed, releasing the set of instruments by means of a winch down to depth of 35–40 m. In particular, the following sensors were employed: a multi-parametric Idronaut 305 Plus CTD type probe (conductivity, temperature, depth, pH, redox, and oxygen), the ArLoC multi-sensor, a fluorimeter, and a turbidimeter. ArLoC (Arctic Low-Cost probe) is a tool used for the acquisition of parameters relating to sea water designed by the University of Tuscia to be flexible, adaptable, low cost, and equipped with sensors for depth, temperature, and chlorophyll-a fluorescence [38]. The management of the underwater winch was performed by using an altimeter to prevent the possibility of grounding and deadlock of the sensors. The use of the robotic vehicle for data acquisition, equipped with the Microstrain 3DM-GX3-35 for the positioning system, made it possible to locate and georeference the physical parameters of the water with horizontal position accuracy <2.5 m. During water column sampling, the underwater position of the bunch of sensors is estimated at a point which, for shallow depths (and little current), can be considered within the uncertainty of the GPS measurement but which obviously degrades with increasing depth and current. All data collected by the cluster of instruments released underwater were synchronized and saved by an ad hoc developed system named MPDACS (Multi-Purpose Data Acquisition Control System).
These operating procedures were used to record the variation of the parameters as a function of the depth at a fixed point, and therefore to study possible effects due to currents, to the introduction of substances by the water coming from the glacial ice melting, and to characterize the area near the front of the glacier from a physical point of view. Once the measurements along the water column were completed, the winch was rewound and PROTEUS was directed to the next sampling point at a distance gradually greater from the front of the glacier. Even during the transfer phases from one sampling point to the next, the measurements of biogeochemical and physical parameters were recorded in the surface layer of the water [9]. In this work, the data collected allowed us to focus on the study of phenomena related to the introduction of melt water from the tidal glaciers present in the Kongsfjorden and the formation of plumes. These events are placed on a very short time scale, almost instantaneous, and on a very localized spatial scale but with consequences on the entire ecosystem of the fjord as these masses of water, once they reach the surface, spread by mixing with the water of the fjord.
Similar innovative sampling strategies, with the use of autonomous vehicles, were also implemented in the northern Tyrrhenian area to characterize gaseous emissions from the seabed. For the Scoglio d’Affrica campaign, due to the complexity of degassing events from the seabed, an integrated study was necessary: acquiring data from different points of view (geological, morphological, and chemical-physical) and video images were necessary in order to characterize the site being tested in an interdisciplinary way. The coordinated action between the different entities took place with the goal of 3D mapping the area with the identification of targets of interest and of classifying the nature of the seabed, developing a rapid environmental characterization procedure in case of exceptional events, environmental monitoring, and risk management as well as in support of civil protection. To this end, the ROV e-URoPe (e-Underwater Robotic Pet) of the CNR-INM had been embarked on the ITS Magnaghi (Italian navy ship) and was used to investigate shallow water areas that could not be reached by the ship itself. The robotic platform e-URoPe of CNR-INM is a second example of the process of technological innovation driven by environmental constraints. The e-URoPe is a hybrid ROV/AUV system (Figure 4) characterized by an open and reconfigurable structure: following the needs coming from the different types of missions and the actual indications arising from the environment, it is possible to easily change the position of sensors and cameras mounted onboard, to add more payload, modify the frame, and even change the propulsion layout [39].
During the 2019 Scoglio d’Affrica campaign, the basic instrumentation for the autonomous navigation of e-URoPe included a system of attitude and orientation measurement (AHRS), a positioning system (GPS), a CTD probe (electrical conductivity, temperature, and depth), a Doppler effect velocimeter (DVL), a fiber optic gyroscope (FOG), an ultrashort baseline transponder (USBL) for underwater acoustic positioning, and two altimeters. The e-URoPe can operate in hovering mode, provided by an automatic control scheme based on adaptive compensation of the vehicle displacement with respect to the desired position. The vehicle position is provided by the GNSS measures (when surfaced) and by the USBL measures when operating underwater; the measures are suitably filtered in order to smooth the position signal and remove identified outliers. The dynamic positioning module then provides the transfer to the desired location, optimizing the convergence trajectory and the station keeping, counteracting sea currents. Since in this specific case study it was not possible to use the USBL, the underwater position of the vehicle was recalculated with the dead reckoning method using the DVL and FOG data.
Moreover, three analog cameras installed at the stern and bow offered the pilot a subjective panoramic view of the operating environment. In addition to the navigation instruments, instruments for the characterization of the seabed had been installed, in particular a single-beam sonar operating at 200 kHz and a vertically mounted ethernet camera that allowed researchers to acquire high-resolution images of the area under the vehicle.
Data acquisition was divided in classic hydro-oceanographic mapping of the whole area of interest using the high resolution multibeam echosounder (MBES) mounted on the ITS Magnaghi and on its support boats. The data collected using the e-URoPe ROV were acquired in a sub-area of the area investigated by the ITS Magnaghi, that is part of an elongated main NNW-SSE ridge that rises 30 m from the surrounding seabed, not far from the Scoglio d’Affrica site, already observed in the high-resolution bathymetric data collected subsequent to the 2017 gas outburst. The ridge is made up of two mounds whose tops are located at about 8 m and 10 m water depths, respectively [40]. The ROV collected video images of the gaseous emissions from the seabed (methane gas) during five dives at as many points of interest as possible. Between one observation point and another, the vehicle was towed by a support rubber dinghy to speed up transfer operations and maximize data acquisition time. The graph in Figure 5 shows the time on the x-axis (in the format hours, minutes, seconds) and the y-axis shows the depth value of the vehicle with respect to the water surface as measured by the depth sensor of the CTD. Observing this graph, it is possible to see the different immersion phases of the ROV, as highlighted by the horizontal red arrows.
The overall operations with the ROV lasted about five and a half hours, during which dives of different durations were made: from the shortest, lasting about twenty minutes, to the longest, lasting more than an hour. Note: Dive three and four are considered a single dive as they took place at the same point of interest. There was no transfer between the two dives but only the ROV, which rose to the surface and then re-submerged.
Regarding the navigation of the ROV, the problems related to the underwater positioning initially encountered were solved in a second instance by integrating the information from the ROV telemetry with the acoustic data from the multibeam survey. The vehicle’s positions obtained from dead reckoning algorithms were subsequently integrated with video and MBES data, allowing the different seafloor features observed in the videos to be associated with the distinct morphologies acoustically identified on the mounds. This made it possible to obtain results with a resolution in space (less than 1 m) and time (from minutes up to hours) that can allow for both the instantaneous interpretation of the data, for alert purposes in the event of a hazard, and long-term interpretation, to study the evolution of the degassing events taking place in the area surrounding the Scoglio d’Affrica. In this way, the inclusion in the data acquisition procedures of inspections of the seabed by the ROV allows researchers to obtain data characterized by a reproducibility, accuracy, and precise georeferencing higher than those obtainable by human operators.

3. Data analysis and Results

The experimental data, their interpretation, as well as the experimental results that can be drawn for the two types of transient marine phenomena observed during the campaign in the Arctic and that in the northern Tyrrhenian Sea are described.

3.1. Water Mass Stratification Near the Conwaybreen Glacier (Kongsfjorden)

The analysis of the data collected during the 2018 campaign, carried out in the framework of the H2020 project “EXCELLABUST—Excelling LABUST in marine robotics” by performing transects at an increasing distance from the front of tidewater glaciers using robotic platforms, gave us the possibility to observe the presence of different masses of water in the Kongsfjorden in a new and better way than traditionally used systems that are not able to reach a level of detail necessary for the fine discrimination of the physical characteristics of water masses near glaciers. In particular, the use of the robotic vehicle for data acquisition, equipped with the Microstrain 3DM-GX3-35 for the positioning system, made it possible to locate and georeference the physical parameters of the water with a horizontal position accuracy <2.5 m. During the water column sampling, the underwater position of the bunch of sensors was estimated at a point which, for shallow depths (and little current), can be considered within the uncertainty of the GPS measurement but which obviously degraded with increasing depth and current. In the context of the oceanographic processes from tidewater glaciers in Kongsfjorden, here we focus on the Conwaybreen glacier (Figure 6) to discuss the importance of the results obtained.
Through the analysis of specific variables, it is possible to identify the distribution of the water mass and the presence, at some points, of the plume of meltwater coming from the glacier before the mixing with the water of the fjord. To identify the distribution of the water masses in this area, the temperature and salinity parameters were analyzed according to both depth and distance from the glacier. This operation was used to identify any oddities in the data that may indicate the presence of water masses of a different nature than the water of the fjord. The following graphs (Figure 7) show the variation in temperature (°C; yellow = warm; blue = cold) and salinity (PSU; yellow = high salinity; blue = low salinity) as a function of depth (m, y-axis) and distance from the front of the glacier (m, x-axis).
Furthermore, by combining the values of the temperature and salinity variables in a T–S graph it is possible to study their distribution as a function of the distance from the glacier front and as a function of the depth with respect to the surface of the water. In this way, it is possible to characterize the stratification of the water masses present, creating a relation with the water masses classification typically reported in the literature and which is summarized in Table 1.
To fully understand the distribution of the masses of water, it should be emphasized that there are numerous factors that influence the dynamics inside the fjord. Near the glacier front, there is a strong inter-relationship between bathymetry and hydrography: bathymetric setting can influence local hydrographic conditions and hence lead to glacial front melt. A recent work carried out by Howe et al. (2019) [19] shows in detail how bathymetry is an important factor in the hydrography near the glacier fronts, enhancing processes such as submarine melting, convection, and mixing.
As bathymetric setting can influence local hydrographic conditions and sills within the fjord can promote mixing and local circulation in front of shallow grounded glaciers, the data acquired by means of the CTD lowered along the water column at increasing distances from the glacier front were analyzed also taking into account, for their interpretation, the data acquired from the altimeter mounted on board the robotic vehicle. which allowed for the reproduction of the trend of the seabed. The following graph (Figure 8) shows the descent profiles of the CTD (blue dots) and the range values of the seabed (orange dots) relative to the Conwaybreen glacier front.
Considering the values of salinity (PSU) and temperature (°C) acquired along these vertical profiles, we constructed the following T–S graph (Figure 9), in which the different profiles are shown with different colors.
Analyzing this graph in connection with the one in Figure 8 and considering the water mass classification of Table 1, three different water masses can be identified in a range that goes from the sea surface to a depth of about 35 m. We can see the presence of local water (LW), characterized by salinity higher than 34.3 PSU and temperature below 1 °C, which is typically found in the deeper layer of the water masses. By contrast, the superficial layer, where the depth varies between the sea surface and about −10 m, is characterized by the presence of surface water and intermediate water. The results discussed here are comparable with those described in [41], obtained from the analysis of the data recorded using the ArLoC sensor prototype developed by the research group from the University of Tuscia [38,42] and mounted onboard PROTEUS during the 2018 EXCELLABUST campaign in Svalbard.
The novelty of this work consists in the ability to identify the presence of a new water mass together with the SW (visible in the upper left part of the previous graph) which is not present in any of the classifications mentioned above. This new water mass is clearly visible by analyzing the semilogarithmic scale graphs of temperature and chlorophyll-a of the P6 and P7 profiles compared, for example, to P4 (Figure 10).
These graphs show important inflection points in the variables temperature and chlorophyll-a compared to the expected trend. We call this new mass “sill surface water” (SSW) as its presence is related to the boundary effect created by seabed morphology on the distribution of the water masses at about 300 m away from the glacier front. The P4 profile (purple dots of Figure 10) correspond to the limit discriminating the SW from the SSW. The presence of this water, characterized by lower temperature and salinity values, can be associated with melting processes taking place at the edge of the glacier. The uniqueness of the results obtained compared to those known in the literature is related to the ability to discriminate water masses of different natures, connected with the circulation phenomena inside the fjord and with the processes occurring at the limit of the ice glacier fronts, with unprecedented level of detail.

3.2. Characterization of Shallow Water Gas Emissions in the Scoglio d’Affrica Area

Due to the complexity of degassing events from the seabed, an integrated study that acquired data from different points of view (geological, morphological, and chemical-physical) and video images was necessary to characterize the site in an interdisciplinary way. The reconstructed underwater vehicle’s positions, integrated with video and MBES data, allowed the different seafloor features observed in the videos to be associated with the distinct morphologies acoustically identified on the seabed. In this way, the video was georeferenced, and a preliminary map of gas emission points was created. The following figure shows the bathymetric map of the area inspected during the campaign where the green crosses and letters identify interesting points obtained from the analysis of the video image. The isobath lines indicate the depth of the seabed corresponding to the different colors: red is about −10 m, yellow about −20 m and so on toward deeper seabed in the light blue area (−40 m).
Mapping the emission points was only the starting point of the analysis. The step forward was to use the new data acquired with the ROV to enrich the morphological and geochemical information known in the literature and obtained from previous campaigns carried out in the same area. Thus, the video data were essential to add value and create relationships between the morphology of the seabed, the composition of the sediments, and the geochemistry of the gases. Cold seeps are, in general, associated with several different seafloor structures, such as mud volcanoes, pockmarks, diapirs, carbonate-related constructions (mounds, chimneys, crusts, plates), brine pools [43]. Based on the morphology as well as the sedimentary, petrographic, and geochemical characteristics of the solid materials analyzed together with the fluids expelled from the Scoglio d’Affrica site, the seeps of the area are classified as a mud volcano [44]. Submarine mud volcanoes are positive geological structures formed by the extrusion of gas (mainly methane) and water-saturated fine-grained sediments; they are often associated with mud breccias and specific morphological features like a central crater and mudflows.
One of the main results obtained by analyzing the videos acquired with the ROV was the possibility not only to characterize the environment in support of the traditional geochemical and morphological analyses but also to observe degassing processes extremely localized in space and study their evolution over time, opening a window to the dynamics of the emission processes also in spatial terms. To this end, a table (Table 2) that summarizes the main features of the points of interest, obtained by integrating the ROV data with the morphological data from [40] and the geochemistry of the area known in the literature [44,45], was created in order to give hints of the mechanisms that originate some of the observed phenomena.
Points A, B, and C are on the western front of the southern mound (Figure 11) responsible for the violent emission of March 2017. These points are located at a depth between −13/−14 m on a hillside that slopes gently toward the deepest part. In this area, the seabed is mainly sandy with scattered rocky blocks. from the point of view of morphology, the area is characterized by multiple lobate mudflows on the side of the mound, some of which have a fresh-looking morphology and most not colonized by Posidonia oceanica meadows, suggesting a repetition of eruptive events in recent times, supported by an overall smooth morpho-acoustic facies (FSS) [40]. In this area, emission activity consisted in trains of bubbles of centimeter size coming out intermittently from small holes of centimeter size. Furthermore, around point A, holes in the seabed no longer emissive (or not emissive in the observation time) were identified. This information is useful to study the temporal evolution of emissions points. from a geochemical point of view, this area was investigated in 2017 with two different campaigns on behalf of the Civil Protection and described in [45]. The investigations carried out highlighted a gas composition with a prevalence of methane (>95 vol%) with some secondary components of CO2 and He. These results are compatible with gas analyses carried out in the Scoglio d’Affrica area dating back to the end of the 1960s, which found emissions composed mainly of methane with an average composition of CH4 88%, N2 7%, O2 4%, CO2 0.2% [22,46] and also with the analyses carried out on gas sampled by the HYDRA Institute in 2011 and reported in [21] from a site located about 1 km to the north from the Scoglio d’Affrica sampling area.
Point D is located to the west side at a depth of about −36 m. Here, the area is characterized by the presence of Posidonia oceanica developed on a seabed characterized by old sediments and gradually colonized. No emission activities were observed in this area. The morphological map of the zone classifies this area as old sediment flow covered with Posidonia oceanica. Moving toward the North, we identified point E located in the western part of the northern mound (Figure 11) at a depth of approximately −28 m. The area is characterized by sand alternating with mud breccia and rocks, morphologically identified as sediment flow. In this area, emission activities consisted of small bubbles, intermittent and originating from the sediment. Going up the slope of the western side of this mound, the morphological structures are of a lower and smooth slope (LSS) divided in sub-facies according to the density of the blocks [40]. In this area, there is the F point, located at the boundary of the top part of the mound, in a shallow water area (about −12 m). Here, the video images showed a sandy seabed with ripple, contoured by blocks of rock mostly covered with algae. This fact indicates that the blocks had been colonized for some time and that the emissions in this area occur from contact points between the sandy bottom and the rocks, not in an explosive manner, and therefore without disturbances for the morphology of the area.

4. Discussion

In this section, the results obtained and showed above are discussed and interpreted from the perspective of previous studies, and the valuable scientific outcomes are underlined.
Recent years have been characterized by an increase in the temperature and frequency of warm AW incursions into west Spitsbergen fjords alongside an increase in the temperature of the WSC [12]. Due to the dynamic nature of cross-shelf transport, there is an annual cycle where water of Arctic origin dominates through winter and Atlantic water dominates through summer [12,20]. A recent study of the Kronebreen–Kongsvegen glacier [47] suggests that the high concentration of suspended sediment discharged in a surface water plume is the result of a subglacial river. The presence of these focused, concentrated discharges of sediment-rich meltwater can strongly influence the ecosystem of the fjord and lead to subsequent consequences for the benthos and biogeochemistry of the environment [19]. In addition to the aforementioned waters of external origin, it is possible to classify different types of water originating inside the fjord; one of these is the surface water (SW), which derives from the dissolution of cryospheric components (snow, ice, and melting of glaciers). The thickness of this surface layer is generally greater in the inner parts of the fjords and then decreases toward the mouth of the fjord. The water in this layer has a very wide range of salinities and temperatures, as shown in Table 1 [19]. Numerous tests have been carried out to characterize the masses of water present in the Kongsfjorden and study their characteristics. For example, in [15], a 6-year time series (2010–2016) of physical parameters and particle fluxes collected by an oceanographic mooring in Kongsfjorden are shown, providing an extraordinary opportunity to investigate seasonal and multiyear changes in the inner fjord. The results suggest that, as the Arctic temperature rises in a warming scenario, the flux of glacier-derived material will increase accordingly. Furthermore, water column stratification modulated by the inflow of warm Atlantic waters, especially in winter, will progressively hamper the exchange of nutrients from the bottom waters [15,16]. In [17] is a report on the hydrology and ocean heat content (OHC) in Kongsfjorden, especially focusing on its innermost part. OHC estimates were based on calculations of the volume of water in the major basins of Kongsfjorden as inferred by a dedicate and accurate bathymetric survey and by CTD casts. from these two examples, chosen among the many available in the literature, it is observed that typically the studies for the characterization of the water masses inside the Kongsfjorden are carried out using instruments installed on moorings and casts. In this work, a different approach was presented based on the use of robotic platforms, paying particular attention to the acquisition procedures and to the data itself, also highlighting the close link with metrology and the possibility to observe phenomena on a very detailed scale.
The sampling of these specific water parameters, inserted in a more general context regarding the study of water masses and their dynamics, is a particularly complex subject that must consider various factors on different time scales. For what concerns the Svalbard area, there are instant components (ice-collapsing and calving events), seasonal and annual components (influence of water coming from ocean currents, seasonal temperature variations, wind, etc.), and also components on much longer time scales (pluri-annual, decennial, and even secular) that can be studied by also analyzing the morphology of the seabed and the sediments at the water-bottom interface. Numerous published works deal with the study of the relationships between the morphology of the seabed and the oceanographic processes that occur near the fronts of the glaciers [10,19,48,49,50,51]. In the work of Howe et al. (2019) [19], models of the glacier fronts and seabed based on AUV observations are presented, combining the oceanography with the bathymetric setting. These models suggest that bathymetry provides a strong control on glacier behavior, driving the water mass structure in the glacier front environment. It is interesting to compare the models regarding the different water masses identified in the Kongsfjorden, described by [19], with the results obtained analyzing the data acquired during the 2018 EXCELLABUST campaign and described in this work. Our data were collected at the end of Mayand the beginning of June 2018 (late spring), while those of article [19] were collected in the first half of August 2017, therefore in summer. The seasonality conditions can justify some differences found in the results obtained but they are not the only causes behind them.
The observation of the SSW mass, not mentioned in other works, can be related to the measurement procedures and the instrumentation used in the 2018 campaign. Investigations near glacier fronts are typically performed using AUVs. These tools are characterized by a high degree of autonomy and the ability to map the environment in a three-dimensional way. On the other hand, they have a lower capacity to discriminate punctual measurements and are also affected by higher uncertainties on positioning as they use underwater acoustic systems, less precise than systems operating in the air. In the campaign described in this work, on the other hand, a robotic system that operates in the water surface was used but with capabilities to acquire parameters also along the water column, thus guaranteeing high positioning accuracy. This allowed us to observe new transient phenomena, characterized by non-repeatability, with high precision, like for example the aforementioned observation of the water masses stratification not only along the vertical profile but also at increasing distance from the glacier front, in correspondence with a particular seabed morphology that creates a boundary effect on the distribution of the water masses.
The complexity of the surface water layer (SW + SSW) must also be interpreted by considering the state of the fjord’s waters as a whole. The measurements of the 2018 campaign, in fact, were made between the end of May and the beginning of June. In this period, the fjord is characterized by more than a month of open waters, as confirmed by the Sentinel 2 images, which show how the surface layer of ice opened in April, making the effect due to the intrusion of warmer Atlantic water almost negligible when the measurements were made (Figure 12). In this condition, the melting processes, highlighted by the presence of high turbidity values in the surface layer, continue to take place at the edge of the glaciers.
The added value of this work was therefore the ability to record these transient variations in the trend of the variables of interest at a level of resolution that allows for an extremely detailed discrimination of the processes that occur at the edge of the glacier front not directly related to the seasonality effects but due to the internal processes that take place inside the fjord, like freshwater runoff, surface heat fluxes, vertical mixing, and wind forcing, to name a few of them. Generally speaking, with this work it was possible to record phenomena showing that the dynamic of the water masses in the fjord system is influenced by numerous factors, generating both vertical movements (differences in temperature and salinity together with differences in density also influenced by parameters such as turbidity and chlorophyll-a) and horizontal movements (external forcing due to the wind and internal due to the morphology of the seabed). from the observation of the results related to this data acquisition campaign, there seems to be a prevalence of the vertical movement, driven by the intrinsic characteristics of the water masses, compared to external forces causing horizontal movements. Being able to observe and record the interactions between the physical and biogeochemical parameters of water in the context of the critical Svalbard environment at such a level of both spatial and temporal detail is essential to understand these water masses movements, study their origin, and follow their effects. Using PROTEUS, it was therefore possible to carry out a complete characterization of the environment near the glacier front, acquiring in situ data with space/time resolutions not obtainable with traditional observation methods and highlighting fundamental phenomena related to the water mass stratification not previously recorded at such a level of detail.
As for the results obtained from the campaign on the Scoglio d’Affrica, it was previously shown that integrating data from different sources (video images, telemetry of the robotic platform, and acoustic MBES data) make it possible to identify different types of seabed and observe whether there are associated gaseous emissions or not. All these observations, summarized in Figure 11 and in Table 2, were used to elaborate the following figure (Figure 13). This thematic map was created by integrating information from different sources: the bathymetric map obtained from the processing of acoustic data from MBES acquired by the Hydrographic Institute of the Italian Navy (IIM), the map showing the classification of the morphologies of the seabed as described in [40], and the morphological information at a high level of detail obtained from the video images acquired with the ROV. The interpretation of the map is supported by the results obtained from the geochemical analysis carried out in the area [44]. The presence of specific morphological structures can help in understanding the origin of the emissions, typically in the sediment and not from fractures in the rock, and also to retrieve information about the porosity of the seabed, as for the same type of seabed and substrate the emissions are different according to it.
From this thematic map it is possible to make some assumptions about the age of the morphological structures observed in this area, Points A, B, C and F, located near the summit of the volcanoes (shallowest area) consist of recently formed morphologies. Point E, in an area at an intermediate depth, is made up of older sediments that flowed along the slope. Point D, on the other hand, is made up of much older sediments, now completely covered with Posidonia oceanica. Moreover, from a geochemical point of view, there is a detailed analysis of the area surrounding point F, described in [44]. As previously stated, this point is located near the northern mound in an area characterized by a sandy bottom with large scattered rocky blocks. Observations made in 2018 showed that the gas was emitted as large bubbles (up to 15 cm in diameter) from conical mud mounds. In the mud volcano area, porewater and seawater samples did not show significant differences from the water samples taken outside the area. The pH was around 8.00 and salinity was about 38 PSU [44]. In addition, the gas chemistry of the collected samples was typical of mud volcanoes ([52,53]), with methane as the prevalent gas component (>95 vol%) and minor gases, including carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and heavier alkanes and helium, whereas CO was present in trace amounts. To assess the origin of the hydrocarbon gases, the stable isotopes as well as the molecular composition were analyzed. δ13C CH4 values from −30‰ to −50‰ were interpreted as thermogenic gases. Moreover, the samples collected at Scoglio d’Affrica were extremely depleted in 3He, with 3He/4He ratio values showing typical values for a gas crustal emitted from a geological setting in which the radiogenic helium component is strongly dominant [44]. Carrying out our observations in the same area but one year later, we still saw emissive activities but of a different nature: the bubbles were intermittent and of reduced size. The type of emission depends on both the porosity of the bottom and the amount of gas in the substrate. from the comparative analysis between the results known in the literature and the observations made with the ROV, it is possible to advance some hypotheses on the temporal evolution of the emissive sites that can evolve either toward a depletion of the emission activity with time (fewer and smaller bubbles emitted), or toward an accumulation of gas in the substrate that increasingly struggles to find a way out and which could then again manifest itself suddenly with a violent explosive activity. In the latter case, the system could have much greater emissive capacities than those observed experimentally with the ROV and this could be an important source of hazard. For all these reasons, continuous and integrated monitoring of these emission sites is of fundamental importance. Moreover, from the analysis of the video data it was possible to obtain a semiquantitative analysis of the emissions by estimating the amount of gas emitted. This fact creates an added value to the ROV data compared to the observations made through the use of human operators: by using the ROV in hovering mode, in fact, it is possible to lengthen the time spent at each point of interest in order to acquire data for an estimate of the emission volumes.
Summarizing, the observing and monitoring activities carried out in complex and critical environments like the ones described above underline that two main aspects are fundamental:
-
the choice of the instruments and sensors to be mounted on the robotic platforms must be able to guarantee certain performances (in time and space) and at the same time must be able to operate even in demanding conditions and with power requirements that are sustainable;
-
the implementation of sampling procedures that are flexible and that can be adapted according to the specific working environment and the measurements to be obtained.
The preliminary results described above are very important because they show that, even in situations far from the “ideal operating conditions”, it is still possible to characterize the environment and detect the presence of transient phenomena that in specific cases can be interpreted as hazard precursors for the implementation of alarm procedures.

5. Conclusions

The work described in this paper has an interdisciplinary value as it analyzes the difficult task of carrying out measurements and observations of transient phenomena in critical environmental conditions from different points of view. The metrological approach is a central point of this work as it is fundamental to characterize the measurements and necessary to give an interpretation of the results obtained in a rigorous way in terms of comparability, consistency, and traceability and to identify specific phenomena that can be seen as “anomalies” in the trend of the data.
From a metrological point of view, specific characteristics are also required in terms of repeatability, accuracy, and resolution of the measurements made. This is a particularly critical point and very often it is not possible to reach certain minimum levels necessary to obtain valuable results from the collected data, especially if traditional methods applied in critical contexts are used. A possible solution to this problem derives from the introduction of robotic autonomous vehicles: these can be exploited to obtain data with characteristics of precision and resolution that allow researchers to obtain valuable information on the observed processes that are very often not obtainable otherwise. The development of acquisition procedures adapted to the use of robotics and guided by critical environmental constraints constitute the other fundamental element for the observation of transient processes. The two examples presented as case studies in this paper show the importance of the methods used for the acquisition of the data with a focus on measurements and their interpretation from the point of view of environmental science. By applying the methodologies developed and described in this work, valuable results were obtained: stratification processes of the water masses, highlighting internal effects due to the morphology of the seabed that created boundary effects, were observed with an unprecedented level of detail. These processes refer to the case study in Svalbard but, suitably adapted and integrated with geochemical and acoustic data, they can be applied to the identification of gaseous emissions in the Tyrrhenian Sea.
In addition, the methodological and data analysis approach used can be extended and also applied in other case studies and in other environmental situations where the quality of the data and its interpretation, also from a metrological point of view, are fundamental. An example of this possible adaptation of the observing methodologies used can be the identification of the presence of Posidonia oceanica on the seabed. The presence of this plant on the seafloor can be identified as an “anomaly” in the captured video images or in the acoustic spectra compared to the data acquired in areas where the Posidonia is not present. The identification approach, in principle, has characteristics similar to that used to identify the presence of a plume of melt water from a glacier or the presence of gas bubbles in the water column. This example shows, once again, how the work described and proposed in this paper provides an approach to the observation of the environment focused on the measurement and its interpretation, in order to obtain the characterization of extremely localized events in space and time with extremely high levels of detail.
Despite autonomous platforms already providing key observations for environmental assessment, further advances in autonomous systems are required to meet the growing ocean observation needs in different scientific fields like biology and biogeochemistry as well as seabed mapping and deep ocean and Polar exploration, together with the growing needs for real-time data. The development of new observation technologies and techniques will advance our understanding particularly of transient events, such as the ones described in this work, but are also extendable to other kind of marine phenomena that require better and faster observation techniques. The use of robotic systems as fundamental data-gathering tools by scientists allows for new perspectives and a greater understanding of the planet and its processes by also taking advantage from the possibility to mount sets of tools on board for a complete characterization of environments, even critical ones, with spatial and temporal resolutions not otherwise obtainable, as extensively described in this paper.
A further and important step forward toward an integrated observation of the marine environment is to have significantly improved interoperability of sensors, systems, and data. The use of standards and best practices for observations make it easier to operate efficiently, share results, and exploit existing data, promoting interoperability and reproducibility of the results obtained. In this perspective, the use of autonomous platforms, already used in a wide range of time and spatial scales for the measurement of physical and biogeochemical variables, allows for the acquisition of a greater volume of standardized and high-quality data, improving comparability and reducing uncertainty. To effectively achieve this goal, it is necessary to combine the skills acquired in the traditional fields of metrology with the new interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary environmental observation strategies, fostering collaborations between communities to develop better measurement standards, perform comparisons, and establish metrological guidelines and operating procedures for observation networks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.F., M.C. (Massimo Caccia), M.C. (Massimo Coltorti) and R.I.; methodology, R.F., M.C. (Massimo Caccia), M.C. (Massimo Coltorti) and R.I.; software, R.F.; validation, R.F., M.C. (Massimo Caccia), M.C. (Massimo Coltorti) and R.I.; formal analysis, R.F.; investigation, R.F., M.C. (Massimo Caccia), M.C. (Massimo Coltorti) and R.I.; resources, M.C. (Massimo Caccia) and R.I.; data curation, R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F.; writing—review and editing, M.C. (Massimo Caccia), M.C. (Massimo Coltorti) and R.I.; visualization, R.F.; supervision, M.C. (Massimo Caccia), M.C. (Massimo Coltorti) and R.I.; project administration, M.C. (Massimo Caccia) and R.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Svalbard campaign was partially funded by the project EC Horizon 2020 Twinning EXCELLABUST—Excelling LABUST in marine robotics G.A. 691980.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the staff of the Base Artica Dirigibile Italia (Ny Alesund) for their kind and professional support. The authors would like also to thank the Italian Navy and the captain and crew of the ITS Magnaghi for the fundamental work done before and during the data acquisition campaign in the Tyrrhenian Sea. We would also thank the Capitaneria di Porto of Piombino for the support and the logistical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zanna, L.; Khatiwala, S.; Gregory, J.M.; Ison, J.; Heimbach, P. Global reconstruction of historical ocean heat storage and transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dañobeitia, J.J.; Pouliquen, S.; Johannessen, T.; Basset, A.; Cannat, M.; Pfeil, B.G.; Fredella, M.I.; Materia, P.; Gourcuff, C.; Magnifico, G.; et al. Toward a Comprehensive and Integrated Strategy of the European Marine Research Infrastructures for Ocean Observations. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raven, J.; Caldeira, K.; Elderfield, H.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Liss, P.; Riebesell, U.; Shepherd, J.; Turley, C.; Watson, A. Ocean Acidification due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide; Clyvedon Press: Cardiff, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. Benveniste, J.; Cazenave, A.; Vignudelli, S.; Fenoglio-Marc, L.; Shah, R.; Almar, R.; Andersen, O.; Birol, F.; Bonnefond, P.; Bouffard, J.; et al. Requirements for a Coastal Hazards Observing System. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Melet, A.; Teatini, P.; Le Cozannet, G.; Jamet, C.; Conversi, A.; Benveniste, J.; Almar, R. Earth Observations for Monitoring Marine Coastal Hazards and Their Drivers. Surv. Geophys. 2020, 41, 1489–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–2030). Available online: https://en.unesco.org/ocean-decade (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  7. Nichols, C.R.; Raghukumar, K. Marine Environmental Characterization. Synth. Lect. Ocean Syst. Eng. 2020, 1, 1–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. El Mahrad, B.; Newton, A.; Icely, J.D.; Kacimi, I.; Abalansa, S.; Snoussi, M. Contribution of remote sensing technologies to a holistic coastal and marine environmental management framework: A review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferretti, R.; Bibuli, M.; Bruzzone, G.; Caccia, M.; Odetti, A.; Cimenti, E. Critical marine environment observation: Measurement problems, technological solutions and procedural methods. In Proceedings of the IMEKO TC-19 Metrology for the Sea, Naples, Italy, 5–7 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindbäck, K.; Kohler, J.; Pettersson, R.; Nuth, C.; Langley, K.; Messerli, A.; Vallot, D.; Matsuoka, K.; Brandt, O. Subglacial topography, ice thickness, and bathymetry of Kongsfjorden, northwestern Svalbard. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2018, 10, 1769–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Van, d.H.F.; Hübner, C.; Błaszczyk, M.; Heimann, M.; Lihavainen, H. SESS Report 2019; Svalbard Integrated Arctic Earth Observing System: Longyearbyen, Norway, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cottier, F.; Tverberg, V.; Inall, M.; Svendsen, H.; Nilsen, F.; Griffiths, C. Water mass modification in an Arctic fjord through cross-shelf exchange: The seasonal hydrography of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2005, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ignatiuk, D.; Jennings, I.; Ferrigni, L.; Godøy, Ø.; Jawak, S.; Lihavainen, H.; Andersen, B. The Observation Facility Catalogue-an overview of the SIOS research infrastructure on Svalbard. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Online Conference, 4–8 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tverberg, V.; Skogseth, R.; Cottier, F.; Sundfjord, A.; Walczowski, W.; Inall, M.E.; Falck, E.; Pavlova, O.; Nilsen, F. The Kongsfjorden Transect: Seasonal and Inter-annual Variability in Hydrography. In Biology and Ecology of Antarctic Krill; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 49–104. [Google Scholar]
  15. D’Angelo, A.; Giglio, F.; Miserocchi, S.; Sanchez-Vidal, A.; Aliani, S.; Tesi, T.; Viola, A.; Mazzola, M.; Langone, L. Multi-year particle fluxes in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Biogeosciences 2018, 15, 5343–5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Caroppo, C.; Pagliara, P.; Azzaro, F.; Miserocchi, S.; Azzaro, M. Late Summer Phytoplankton Blooms in the Changing Polar Environment of the Kongsfjorden (Svalbard, Arctic). Cryptogam. Algologie 2017, 38, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aliani, S.; Sciascia, R.; Conese, I.; D’Angelo, A.; Del Bianco, F.; Giglio, F.; Langone, L.; Miserocchi, S. Characterization of seawater properties and ocean heat content in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard Archipelago. Rend. Lincei 2016, 27, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bensi, M.; Kovačević, V.; Langone, L.; Aliani, S.; Ursella, L.; Goszczko, I.; Soltwedel, T.; Skogseth, R.; Nilsen, F.; DePonte, D.; et al. Deep Flow Variability Offshore South-West Svalbard (Fram Strait). Water 2019, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Howe, J.A.; Husum, K.; Inall, M.E.; Coogan, J.; Luckman, A.; Arosio, R.; Abernethy, C.; Verchili, D. Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) observations of recent tidewater glacier retreat, western Svalbard. Mar. Geol. 2019, 417, 106009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Svendsen, H.; Beszczynska-Møller, A.; Hagen, J.O.; Lefauconnier, B.; Tverberg, V.; Gerland, S.; Ørbæk, J.B.; Bischof, K.; Papucci, C.; Zajaczkowski, M.; et al. The physical environment of Kongsfjorden–Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard. Polar Res. 2002, 21, 133–166. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meister, P.; Wiedling, J.; Lott, C.; Bach, W.; Kuhfuß, H.; Wegener, G.; Böttcher, M.E.; Deusner, C.; Lichtschlag, A.; Bernasconi, S.M.; et al. Anaerobic methane oxidation inducing carbonate precipitation at abiogenic methane seeps in the Tuscan archipelago (Italy). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barletta, S.; Del Bono, G.L.; Salvati, L. Nota preliminare sui lavori geomorfologici e geominerari subacquei effettuati dal Servizio Geologico d’Italia dal 1964 al 1969. Boll. Serv. Geol. It 1969, 90, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chiocci, F.L.; Casalbore, D.; Martorelli, E.; Beaubien, S.; Bigi, S.; Pierdomenico, M. Emissioni di fluidi al largo dello scoglio d’Affrica (Arcipelago Toscano). Rapp. Dip. Prot. Civ. 2017. Internal report: Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  24. Delory, E.; Jay, P. Challenges and Innovations in Ocean In Situ Sensors: Measuring Inner Ocean Processes and Health in the Digital Age; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lindstrom, E.; Gunn, J.; Fischer, A.; McCurdy, A.; Glover, L.K.; Members, T.T. A Framework for Ocean Observing. Framew. Ocean Obs. 2012, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Whitt, C.; Pearlman, J.; Polagye, B.; Caimi, F.; Muller-Karger, F.; Copping, A.; Spence, H.; Madhusudhana, S.; Kirkwood, W.; Grosjean, L.; et al. Future Vision for Autonomous Ocean Observations. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anderson, C.R.; Berdalet, E.; Kudela, R.M.; Cusack, C.K.; Silke, J.; O’Rourke, E.; Dugan, D.; McCammon, M.; Newton, J.A.; Moore, S.K.; et al. Scaling Up from Regional Case Studies to a Global Harmful Algal Bloom Observing System. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manalang, D.; Delaney, J.; Marburg, A.; Nawaz, A. Resident AUV Workshop 2018: Applications and a Path Forward. In 2018 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Workshop (AUV), Porto, Portugal, 6–9 November 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Board, Ocean Studies, and National Research Council. Science at Sea: Meeting Future Oceanographic Goals with a Robust Academic Research Fleet; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vihma, T.; Uotila, P.; Sandven, S.; Pozdnyakov, D.; Makshtas, A.; Pelyasov, A.; Pirazzini, R.; Danielsen, F.; Chalov, S.; Lappalainen, H.K.; et al. Towards an advanced observation system for the marine Arctic in the framework of the Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX). Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2019, 19, 1941–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tanhua, T.; McCurdy, A.; Fischer, A.; Appeltans, W.; Bax, N.J.; Currie, K.; Deyoung, B.; Dunn, D.C.; Heslop, E.; Glover, L.K.; et al. What We Have Learned from the Framework for Ocean Observing: Evolution of the Global Ocean Observing System. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. EURAMET, the European Association of National Metrology Institutes, Strategic Research Agenda for Metrology in Europe, Version 1.0 (03/2016). Available online: https://www.euramet.org/Media/news/G-GNP-STR-003_SRA_web.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  33. Woolliams, E.; Pascale, C.; Fisicaro, P.; Fox, N. The European metrology network for climate and ocean observation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Metrology (CIM2019), Paris, France, 24–26 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  34. ARICE: Arctic Research Icebreaker Consortium: A Strategy for Meeting the Needs for Marine-Based Research in the Arctic, Deliverable 6.2., Recommendations for Automatic Environmental Data Collection of Ice Going Vessels. 2019. Available online: https://arice.eu/images/Intranet/deliverables/ARICE_D6.2_Recommendations_for_automatic.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  35. Bruzzone, G.; Odetti, A.; Caccia, M.; Ferretti, R. Monitoring of Sea-Ice-Atmosphere Interface in the Proximity of Arctic Tidewater Glaciers: The Contribution of Marine Robotics. Remote. Sens. 2020, 12, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Odetti, A.; Bruzzone, G.; Caccia, M.; Spirandelli, E.; Bruzzone, G. P2-ROV a portable/polar ROV. OCEANS 2017-Aberdeen 2017, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. SIOS, Guidelines for Metadata and Data Sharing. 21 June 2019. Available online: https://sios-svalbard.org/sites/sios-svalbard.org/files/common/sdms-guidelines4providers.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  38. Piermattei, V.; Madonia, A.; Bonamano, S.; Martellucci, R.; Bruzzone, G.; Ferretti, R.; Odetti, A.; Azzaro, M.; Zappalà, G.; Marcelli, M. Cost-Effective Technologies to Study the Arctic Ocean Environment. Sensors 2018, 18, 2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Odetti, A.; Bibuli, M.; Bruzzone, G.; Caccia, M.; Spirandelli, E.; Bruzzone, G. e-URoPe: A reconfgurable AUV/ROV for man-robot underwater cooperation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017, 50, 11203–11208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Casalbore, D.; Ingrassia, M.; Pierdomenico, M.; Beaubien, S.E.; Martorelli, E.; Bigi, S.; Ivaldi, R.; DeMarte, M.; Chiocci, F.L. Morpho-acoustic characterization of a shallow-water mud volcano offshore Scoglio d’Affrica (Northern Tyrrhenian Sea) responsible for a violent gas outburst in 2017. Mar. Geol. 2020, 428, 106277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pasculli, L.; Piermattei, V.; Madonia, A.; Bruzzone, G.; Caccia, M.; Ferretti, R.; Odetti, A.; Marcelli, M. New Cost-Effective Technologies Applied to the Study of the Glacier Melting Influence on Physical and Biological Processes in Kongsfjorden Area (Svalbard). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marcelli, M.; Pannocchi, A.; Piermattei, V.; Mainardi, U. New technological developments for oceanographic observations. In Oceanography; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Crotia, 2010; p. 4178. [Google Scholar]
  43. Klaucke, I. Sidescan Sonar. In Submarine Geomorphology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. Saroni, A.; Sciarra, A.; Grassa, F.; Eich, A.; Weber, M.; Lott, C.; Ferretti, G.; Ivaldi, R.; Coltorti, M. Shallow submarine mud volcano in the northern Tyrrhenian sea, Italy. Appl. Geochem. 2020, 122, 104722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. INGV–Rapporto Tecnico. Attività di prospezione geofisica e oceanografica su Nave Aretusa (IIM- Marina Militare) nel tratto di Mare tra le isole di Montecristo e Pianosa (Scoglio d’Africa). INGV–Rapp. Tec. 2017. Internal report: Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  46. Del Bono, G.L.; Giammarino, S. Rinvenimento di manifestazioni metanifere nelle Praterie a Posidonie sui fondi marini prospicienti lo «Scoglio d’Africa» nell’Arcipelago Toscano. Atti Ist. Geol. Univ. Genova 1968, 6, 11. [Google Scholar]
  47. Meslard, F.; Bourrin, F.; Many, G.; Kerhervé, P. Suspended particle dynamics and fluxes in an Arctic fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2018, 204, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Batchelor, C.L.; Dowdeswell, J.A.; Ottesen, D. Submarine glacial landforms. In Submarine Geomorphology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 207–234. [Google Scholar]
  49. Dowdeswell, J.A.; Canals, M.; Jakobsson, M.; Todd, B.J.; Dowdeswell, E.K.; Hogan, K.A.; Gyllencreutz, R.; Mayer, L.A.; Larter, R.D.; Batchelor, C.L.; et al. About this title—Atlas of Submarine Glacial Landforms: Modern, Quaternary and Ancient. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. 2016, 46, NP.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Forwick, M.; Baeten, N.J.; Bunin, E.; Hansen, T.; Kempf, P.; Velle, J.H.; Sverre Laberg, J. Last glacial ice-sheet dynamics and deglaciation on Svalbard inferred from fjord records. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2015, Vienna, Austria, 12–17 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ottesen, D.; Dowdeswell, J.A. Assemblages of submarine landforms produced by tidewater glaciers in Svalbard. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2006, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Etiope, G.; Feyzullayev, A.; Baciu, C.L. Terrestrial methane seeps and mud volcanoes: A global perspective of gas origin. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2009, 26, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Etiope, G.; Feyzullayev, A.; Milkov, A.; Waseda, A.; Mizobe, K.; Sun, C. Evidence of subsurface anaerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons and potential secondary methanogenesis in terrestrial mud volcanoes. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2009, 26, 1692–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of Svalbard (Norway) and Kongsfjorden (Norsk Polar Institute).
Figure 1. Map of Svalbard (Norway) and Kongsfjorden (Norsk Polar Institute).
Jmse 09 00578 g001
Figure 2. Map showing the location of the Scoglio d’Affrica (Tuscan archipelago) in the waters between the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Corsica Channel.
Figure 2. Map showing the location of the Scoglio d’Affrica (Tuscan archipelago) in the waters between the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Corsica Channel.
Jmse 09 00578 g002
Figure 3. (Left): Picture of PROTEUS (Portable RObotic TEchnology for Unmanned Surveys) in Ny Alesund. (Right): PROTEUS components: 1—control system in a pressure-tight canister; 2—shockproof frame of polyethylene; 3—thrusters; 4—removable foam; 5—battery pack for USSV operations; 6—surface control unit, GPS, and inertial sensors; 7—cameras; 8—communications, Wi-Fi antenna, and auxiliary ethernet cameras; 9—multi-probe CTD; 10—front sensors, such as turbidimeter, fluorimeter, and altimeter.
Figure 3. (Left): Picture of PROTEUS (Portable RObotic TEchnology for Unmanned Surveys) in Ny Alesund. (Right): PROTEUS components: 1—control system in a pressure-tight canister; 2—shockproof frame of polyethylene; 3—thrusters; 4—removable foam; 5—battery pack for USSV operations; 6—surface control unit, GPS, and inertial sensors; 7—cameras; 8—communications, Wi-Fi antenna, and auxiliary ethernet cameras; 9—multi-probe CTD; 10—front sensors, such as turbidimeter, fluorimeter, and altimeter.
Jmse 09 00578 g003
Figure 4. The e-URoPe (e-Underwater Robotic Pet) hybrid ROV/AUV system of CNR-INM. On the left, a picture and two renderings of the robotic platform are shown. On the right, a table with the main characteristics of the robotic vehicle.
Figure 4. The e-URoPe (e-Underwater Robotic Pet) hybrid ROV/AUV system of CNR-INM. On the left, a picture and two renderings of the robotic platform are shown. On the right, a table with the main characteristics of the robotic vehicle.
Jmse 09 00578 g004
Figure 5. Graph showing the five dives performed by the e-URoPe (horizontal red arrows). The x-axis shows the time (in the format hours, minutes, seconds) and the y-axis shows the depth value of the vehicle with respect to the water surface as measured by the depth sensor of the CTD.
Figure 5. Graph showing the five dives performed by the e-URoPe (horizontal red arrows). The x-axis shows the time (in the format hours, minutes, seconds) and the y-axis shows the depth value of the vehicle with respect to the water surface as measured by the depth sensor of the CTD.
Jmse 09 00578 g005
Figure 6. Sentinel-2 satellite image showing the position of three tidewater glaciers in the Kongsfjorden. In the red box on the right, the position of the Conwaybreen glacier front is shown together with the transect made with PROTEUS (red track).
Figure 6. Sentinel-2 satellite image showing the position of three tidewater glaciers in the Kongsfjorden. In the red box on the right, the position of the Conwaybreen glacier front is shown together with the transect made with PROTEUS (red track).
Jmse 09 00578 g006
Figure 7. Graphs showing the variation in temperature (°C; yellow = warm; blue = cold; left side) and salinity (PSU; yellow = high salinity; blue = low salinity; right side) as a function of depth (m, y-axis) and distance from the front of the glacier (m, x-axis).
Figure 7. Graphs showing the variation in temperature (°C; yellow = warm; blue = cold; left side) and salinity (PSU; yellow = high salinity; blue = low salinity; right side) as a function of depth (m, y-axis) and distance from the front of the glacier (m, x-axis).
Jmse 09 00578 g007
Figure 8. Graph of the descent profiles of the CTD (blue dots) as a function of the distance from the glacier, showing the trend of the seabed (orange dots) obtained from the data of the altimeter mounted on board PROTEUS. P1 is the CTD profile near to the glacier front (the first on the left side) and P7 is the CTD profile far from the glacier front (the last on the right).
Figure 8. Graph of the descent profiles of the CTD (blue dots) as a function of the distance from the glacier, showing the trend of the seabed (orange dots) obtained from the data of the altimeter mounted on board PROTEUS. P1 is the CTD profile near to the glacier front (the first on the left side) and P7 is the CTD profile far from the glacier front (the last on the right).
Jmse 09 00578 g008
Figure 9. Graph showing in different colors the temperature (y-axis, °C) and salinity (x-axis, PSU) data of the different vertical CTD profiles. The classification of water masses as shown in Table 1 has been superimposed on these graphs: SW-surface water; IW-intermediate water; LW-local water.
Figure 9. Graph showing in different colors the temperature (y-axis, °C) and salinity (x-axis, PSU) data of the different vertical CTD profiles. The classification of water masses as shown in Table 1 has been superimposed on these graphs: SW-surface water; IW-intermediate water; LW-local water.
Jmse 09 00578 g009
Figure 10. Semilogarithmic scale graphs of temperature and chlorophyll-a of the vertical profiles.
Figure 10. Semilogarithmic scale graphs of temperature and chlorophyll-a of the vertical profiles.
Jmse 09 00578 g010
Figure 11. Bathymetric map of the area inspected during the 2019 campaign (Courtesy of Italian Hydrographic Institute). The green crosses and the letters highlight a selection of interesting point obtained from the analysis of the video images.
Figure 11. Bathymetric map of the area inspected during the 2019 campaign (Courtesy of Italian Hydrographic Institute). The green crosses and the letters highlight a selection of interesting point obtained from the analysis of the video images.
Jmse 09 00578 g011
Figure 12. The three images are obtained from Sentinel 2 data and show, from left to right, the progressive melting of the fjord’s surface ice layer due to the intrusion of warmer Atlantic water. It can be seen that in March (left picture) the ice cover started to melt; subsequently it is seen that in April (central picture) the melting had already largely occurred and that at the end of May (right picture), the period in which the tests were carried out, the fjord was free from ice cover for over a month.
Figure 12. The three images are obtained from Sentinel 2 data and show, from left to right, the progressive melting of the fjord’s surface ice layer due to the intrusion of warmer Atlantic water. It can be seen that in March (left picture) the ice cover started to melt; subsequently it is seen that in April (central picture) the melting had already largely occurred and that at the end of May (right picture), the period in which the tests were carried out, the fjord was free from ice cover for over a month.
Jmse 09 00578 g012
Figure 13. Thematic map created integrating the high-resolution morphological information from the ROV video, the bathymetric map obtained from the processing of data from MBES acquired by the Hydrographic Institute of the Italian Navy (IIM), and the map showing the classification of the morphologies of the seabed as described in [40]. Each point (A, B, C, D, E and F) is characterized by specific characteristics, detailed in Table 2.
Figure 13. Thematic map created integrating the high-resolution morphological information from the ROV video, the bathymetric map obtained from the processing of data from MBES acquired by the Hydrographic Institute of the Italian Navy (IIM), and the map showing the classification of the morphologies of the seabed as described in [40]. Each point (A, B, C, D, E and F) is characterized by specific characteristics, detailed in Table 2.
Jmse 09 00578 g013
Table 1. Comparative table summarizing the classification of water masses found in the literature. In particular, the values are obtained from [12,19]. The values shown in blue in the brackets are obtained from [14], adapted from [20].
Table 1. Comparative table summarizing the classification of water masses found in the literature. In particular, the values are obtained from [12,19]. The values shown in blue in the brackets are obtained from [14], adapted from [20].
Water MassAbbreviationCharacteristics
Temperature (°C)Salinity (PSU)
External
Atlantic WaterAW>3.0 (3.0 to 7.0)>34.65 (34.9 to 35.2)
Arctic WaterArW−1.5 to 1.034.30 to 34.80
Internal
Winter-cooled WaterWCW<−0.5 (−1.9 to −0.5)34.40 to 35.00 (34.4 to 35.0)
Local WaterLW−0.5 to 1.034.30 to 34.85
Surface WaterSW>1.0 (1.0 to 7.0)<34.00 (30.0 to 34.0)
Mixed
Transformed Atlantic WaterTAW1.0 to 3.0 (1.0 to 7.0)>34.65 (34.7 to 34.9)
Intermediate WaterIW>1.0 (1.0 to 7.0)34.00 to 34.65 (34.0 to 34.7)
Table 2. Table showing details about the selected point of Figure 11: position coordinates (WGS84-EPSG 4326), depth of the seabed (m), seabed type, presence or not of gas emission, and the image of the area extracted from the video. * = morphology data as indicated in [40]; ** = geochemistry data as indicated in [44,45].
Table 2. Table showing details about the selected point of Figure 11: position coordinates (WGS84-EPSG 4326), depth of the seabed (m), seabed type, presence or not of gas emission, and the image of the area extracted from the video. * = morphology data as indicated in [40]; ** = geochemistry data as indicated in [44,45].
Jmse 09 00578 i001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferretti, R.; Caccia, M.; Coltorti, M.; Ivaldi, R. New Approaches for the Observation of Transient Phenomena in Critical Marine Environment. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060578

AMA Style

Ferretti R, Caccia M, Coltorti M, Ivaldi R. New Approaches for the Observation of Transient Phenomena in Critical Marine Environment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(6):578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferretti, Roberta, Massimo Caccia, Massimo Coltorti, and Roberta Ivaldi. 2021. "New Approaches for the Observation of Transient Phenomena in Critical Marine Environment" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 9, no. 6: 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060578

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop