Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: “Physics and Mechanics of New Materials and Their Applications”
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Systems
Previous Article in Journal
LQI Control System Design with GA Approach for Flying-Type Firefighting Robot Using Waterpower and Weight-Shifting Mechanism
Previous Article in Special Issue
CoMP-Aware BBU Placements for 5G Radio Access Networks over Optical Aggregation Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Approach for Micro-Antenna Fabrication on ZrO2 Substrate Assisted by Laser Printing for Smart Implants

1
CMEMS, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
2
Materials Science and Engineering Post-Graduate Program, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(18), 9333; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189333
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 17 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Wireless Communication Technologies)

Abstract

:
The use of Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) in medicine has rapidly expanded over the past decade, driven by its advantageous properties, showing potential to overcome titanium alloy in implant fabrication. The release of metal ions and the aesthetic problems of titanium alloy implants are the main reasons for this trend. In addition to meeting expectations regarding its properties, an implant must possess intrinsic capacities such as auto-diagnostic and auto-treatment. Thus, based on the concept of smart implants, this work proposes a hybrid approach for printing a part of the communication system of a zirconia implant by resorting to laser technology, aiming to endow the implant with intrinsic capacities. Therefore, the antenna was designed and then printed on the zirconia surface. The laser was applied as a versatile tool, whether for preparing the surface of the material in a subtractive way, by creating the micro-cavity, or for printing the silver-based antenna in an additive way through laser technology. The silver powder was used as the conductor material of the antenna. The results revealed that the antenna is capable of communicating from inside the body with the outside world without needing to have an exterior antenna attached to the skin.

1. Introduction

Orthopedic implants are medical devices that are implanted surgically in the human body to replace missing joints and bones or restore the function of a damaged structure [1]. The market for orthopedic implants is one of the biggest in the medical field, and it is expected to expand significantly in the future, mainly due to the continuously growing elderly population. By taking hip replacement surgery as an example, more than 600,000 people need hip replacement surgery every year, and it is estimated that this number will exceed 1 million by 2030 [2,3]. Until present, titanium alloys have been considered the gold standard choice for implant manufacturing, mainly due to their mechanical performance and excellent biocompatibility [4,5,6]. Despite this, the long-term use of titanium-based implants will result in the emergence of metal grinding particles, which would cause inflammation around the surrounding tissue, in addition to releasing metallic ions into the body. These inevitable phenomena can eventually lead to the failure of and require reoperation, which causes physical pain and financial burden to the patients [4,7]. In this regard, zirconia (3Y-TZP) is a biomaterial that has been increasingly studied as a potential substitute for metal in biomedical implants, as shown in several studies [8,9,10,11], such as the dental field [12,13,14,15,16], hip implants and knee prosthesis [17,18]. The remarkable properties reported for 3Y-TZP in the literature include high flexural strength (up to 900–1200 MPa) [15], high fracture toughness (7–10 MPa m1/2) [14], wear resistance, optical and biological properties, biocompatibility and antibacterial properties [19,20,21]. Despite the efforts, the trend toward zirconia implants is still fraught with challenges, mainly due to its brittleness and sensitivity to surface defects. For this reason, good quality control during the manufacturing process is essential for the satisfactory long-term performance of zirconia implants, which raises the need for works focused on evaluating the optimal design for the next generation of zirconia implants.
The ability to monitor the implant’s performance along with its use in real time and establish communication with the user could offer advantages in detecting failures, transmitting qualitative data to start treatments and detecting eventual problems in advance. These achievements are only possible with the fabrication of implants endowed with smart implants, which are implantable devices (including sensors, actuators and antenna) that can provide therapeutic benefits and also diagnostic capabilities [22]. They offer a significant role in the patients’ lives, covering various sensing and actuation applications in healthcare according to their external stimuli such as stress, light, temperature or magnetic fields [23,24,25,26]. In the literature, there are some works reporting biomedical implants with smart devices coupled in their structure; however, in most cases, their size and adaptation along the implant structure can affect their properties negatively [22,27,28,29].
Therefore, a manufacturing system capable of building, in one process, an orthopaedical implant equipped with smart devices to make possible the analysis of issues in real-time in the implant and make decisions to perform smart actions is still a challenge to be overcome. In order to be accommodated in the implant, the communication module’s antenna should be very small and require very low power, making its design a key requirement for an efficient antenna for the communication system [30,31]. An exemplification of a hip implant endowed with smart components is illustrated in Figure 1.
The conventional methods used to fabricate antennas in an insulator substrate may entail time-consuming and additional fabrication steps [31,33]. However, resorting to additive manufacturing technology, it is possible to print implants with smart components, namely sensors, actuators and antennas, in a single step. In prior work, the authors printed micro-wires in zirconia substrate, which showed satisfactory results regarding communication ability [32]. Thereby, this study built the next step toward the functionalization of zirconia-based implants, which ultimately deals with the printing of a silver-based communication antenna to compose the communication system. It provides the manufacturing steps and determines the capability of the printed antenna to be used in an implant for communication purposes. In the present study, we first showed the strategy to machine this surface with a laser, creating the cavity where the conductive material of the antenna will then be consolidated. After printing, the antenna will be tested to verify its efficiency in transmitting and receiving signals in an environment that mimics the biological environment.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials

Disk specimens of commercial Yttria-stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) were used as the substrate for antenna printing, while commercial silver powder (≥99% pure) from Metalor Technologies, North Attleboro, MA, USA, with an average grain size of 230 nm, was employed as the conductive path. The irregular spherical shape of Ag particles is observed in micrographs of Figure 2a,b, with sizes of about 70–300 nm. Among the conductor’s materials, silver presents the greatest electrical conductivity of all metals, with a resistivity of 1.6 × 10−8 ohm.m. According to the literature, at minimal and reasonable concentrations of silver, there are no side effects on the human body [34], and its use in the biomedical field was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the 1920s to be used as an antibacterial agent. Therefore, joining its great electrical property with its good acceptance in the biomedical field, this material seems to be a promising choice to compose the communication system of implants as a conductive path for where the electrical current flow.

2.2. Methods

(a)
Zirconia substrates preparation
In this study, 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia powder (from Tosoh Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with an average size of 60 μm was used to produce zirconia substrates. Zirconia disks were produced by cold press and sinter technique by using a cylindrical stainless steel mold of 18 mm in diameter, where zirconia powder was compacted by a pressure of 200 MPa for 30 s. Hereinafter, zirconia disks were sintered using a high-temperature furnace (Zirkonofen 700, Zirkonzahn, Gais, Italy) with a sintering temperature of 1500 °C, a heating and cooling rate of 8 °C/min and 2 h of holding time. Zirconia samples 14.4 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick were obtained after sintering.
(b)
Antenna production
The antenna printing was performed in three steps:
i.
Micro-cavity creation through laser machining;
ii.
Silver powder deposition into the cavity;
iii.
Laser sintering of the silver powder.
The schematic representation of laser machining is illustrated in Figure 3.
i.
Micro-cavity creation through laser machining
In this step, a pulsed Nd:YAG laser (OEM Plus, Italy) with 1064 nm of wavelength, a spot size of 3 μm, 6 W of power and a focal length of 160 mm with a gaussian beam mode was applied to create the micro-cavity on zirconia surface (as a subtractive process). In order to create the micro-cavity, a sequence of lines was performed with a distance of 10 μm between them, forming a cavity with a width of approximately 350 μm, as illustrated in Figure 3a. The cavity was created using a laser fluence of 0.72 J/mm2 and a scanning speed of 50 mm/s, and the laser machining parameters were chosen based on the optimal conditions studied in previously published works by the authors [32,35].
ii.
Silver powder deposition into the cavity
After the micro-cavity creation on the zirconia surface, the silver powder was placed and compacted into the cavity with the help of a spatula, and then a pressure of 8 MPa was applied in a hydraulic press to ensure the total accommodation of the powder, as shown in Figure 3b. During the preparation, the excess silver powder was removed from the surface by using a P800 grit SiC paper. After these processes, the micro-cavities were completely filled with silver powder.
iii.
Laser sintering of the silver powder
For the silver powder consolidation, an Nd:YAG laser (Sisma, Piovene Rocchette, Italy, 1064 nm of wavelength) with 0.3 mm of spot size and 40 W of power with a gaussian beam mode was used as an additive process for sintering the silver path. Laser energy of 4 Joules was used for sintering silver powder, and this condition was chosen based on previous works [32,35], considering the best condition to melt the powder with fewer defects for the ceramic substrate. In the sintering process, a dual-axis automatic worktable was used to adjust the sample position.
(c)
Antenna test configuration
Characterization and testing of the fabricated antenna began by interfacing it with standard measurement equipment. For that, a U.FL cable was cut in half, and its ground and signal lines were separated, as shown in Figure 4a. Each of these terminations was then connected to the antenna resorting to silver conductive paint, resulting in the device of Figure 4b.
The antenna was connected to a Vector Network Analyzer (model Keysight E5071C ENA) to measure its properties and determine its suitability for use inside the human body as a communication antenna. This is an important step to test the antenna performance when it is involved in a biological environment since these surroundings have a profound effect on the radiation characteristics of an antenna. Therefore, the antenna under testing was placed between two 1 cm-thick beef steaks to approximate the test’s conditions to the antenna’s operating conditions once it is implanted [36,37,38].
The measurement setup is presented in Figure 5. A Q-par Angus WBH2-18S horn antenna was used as a transmitter, and it was placed 25 cm away from the fabricated antenna. A polymeric foam was used to hold the structure of the DUT test, and it is invisible to electromagnetic waves in the frequency range used (it behaves as air).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antenna Manufacturing

Figure 6 presents the SEM images of the micro-cavity created by laser (subtractive process) on the zirconia surface. The micro-cavity was produced in accordance with the defined antenna design.
After the micro-cavity was created on the surface, the silver powder was placed into the cavity and consolidated by a laser sintering approach (additive process). Figure 7 shows a part of the antenna path before and after laser sintering.
The images from Figure 7 show that the silver powder grains were melted in the sintering condition used. The great advantage of laser sintering is the possibility to sinter specific zones by concentrating the laser energy. However, because of the quick heating and cooling during the laser sintering process, the materials normally receive high residual stress. In some cases, cracks may even be initiated in the surrounding area. The distribution and magnitude of the residual stress are influenced by the laser machining strategy, material properties and environmental conditions. This aspect is evidenced by Figure 7b, in which some micro-cracks are present in the zirconia substrate after the laser sintering process of the antenna. Although the laser beam focused only on the silver path, the heat from laser irradiation promoted thermal stress on the ceramic substrate. Even in previous studies [32,35], the authors verified a decrease in flexural strength of zirconia samples after laser printing of the components. This decline is a consequence of the laser process, which easily forms a tiny accumulation of defects or cracks. However, in this study, even with a decrease in resistance, the values are still within the permissible limits by the standard ISO 13356:2015 (≥500 MPa) for zirconia specimens [32,39].

3.2. Antenna Performance

The return and transmission losses of the antenna are displayed in Figure 8 respectively. Through their analysis, it is possible to conclude that the antenna, when placed inside biological tissue, operates best at 2.4 GHz, as its S11 parameter is the lowest at that frequency and the S21 parameter is the highest. Operation at 2.4 GHz, i.e., the ISM band, is an attractive feature of the antenna, as common communication protocols, e.g., Wi-fi and Bluetooth, also utilize this band, thus making it easier to establish a communication link with the implanted device.
Further analysis of the experimental results, namely the S21 parameter, indicates that the fabricated antenna is capable of receiving −45 dB of power from the transmission antenna at 2.4 GHz when they are 25 cm apart.
In order to determine the suitability of the antenna for communication in the presented scenario, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of the antenna must be considered. The SAR is a measurement of how much energy from the electromagnetic wave propagating through the tissue is absorbed by said tissue. In order to guarantee the safety of the patient, the SAR must be below a predefined limit, in this case, 2 W/kg, as values higher than this can lead to significant heating of the tissues. Since communication modules that can be used outside the body have sensitivities of −90 dBm, −125 dBm and even as low as −150 dBm [10], the transmitter inside the body can be transmitted with an extremely low power level, for example, −10 dBm, thus guaranteeing a low SAR. With such an output power, −55 dBm would still reach the receiver (in the previously described scenario of Figure 5), a value well above the mentioned sensitivities.
Thus, we can state that given that communication modules can easily achieve sensitivities of −120 dBm, and assuming the implanted antenna will transmit data with a very conservative power of −10 dBm, the S21 could be as low as −110 dB for −120 dBm of power (the detection limit) to reach the communication module. As it is −45 dB, we have 65 dB of margin, which means we receive signals with power more than six orders of magnitude higher than the minimum that the receivers can detect. Furthermore, the test performed on the antenna allowed mimicking the real scenario with the use of biological tissue. Thus, considering the setup in which the antenna was tested and the high margin of power achieved, it is clear that the developed antenna is suitable for wireless communications from inside the body.

4. Conclusions

A promising approach to producing a silver-based antenna on a ceramic substrate was presented in this work. As a versatile tool, the laser technique was utilized to produce the micro-cavity in zirconia substrate (as a subtractive process) and also to sinter the silver antenna into this cavity (as an additive process). A micro-cavity with the desired antenna design was created by laser on the zirconia surface, and then the silver powder was successfully sintered into this cavity, forming a conductor path. In addition to being a fast and inexpensive manufacturing technique, this approach can also be applied to other and more complex designs. According to the results, the fabricated antenna can receive −45 dB at 2.4 GHz from a horn antenna placed 25 cm away from it while safeguarding the safety of the patient. The antenna fabricated through the proposed method can be used safely in an implant to bidirectionally communicate data with the outside world without the need to have the exterior antenna attached to the skin, thus allowing for truly tether-less applications.

Author Contributions

C.M.: investigation and writing; H.D.: investigation and writing; Ó.C.: technical guidance; P.M.: investigation and reviewing; R.N.: investigation and reviewing; F.S.: investigation and reviewing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by the FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia -Portugal) in the scope of the projects UID/EEA/04436/2019; Magsense_POCI-01-0247-FEDER-033783, Add.Additive_Manufacturing to Portuguese Industry_POCI-01-0247-FEDER-024533, grant SFRH/BD/116554/2016 and the CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for the grant 205791/2014-0.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. O’Connor, C.; Kiourti, A. Wireless Sensors for Smart Orthopedic Implants. J. Bio-Tribo-Corros. 2017, 3, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kurtz, S.; Ong, K.; Lau, E.; Mowat, F.; Halpern, M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Ser. A 2007, 89, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lewallen, E.A.; Riester, S.M.; Bonin, C.A.; Kremers, H.M.; Dudakovic, A.; Kakar, S.; Cohen, R.C.; Westendorf, J.J.; Lewallen, D.G.; van Wijnen, A.J. Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal ortho- pedic implants. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2015, 21, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Park, J.; Lakes, R.S. Biomaterials: An Introduction; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ruff, C.; Holt, B.; Trinkaus, E. Perspectives Who’ s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolff ?: “Wolff’s Law” and Bone Functional Adaptation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2006, 498, 484–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Diamanti, M.V.; Pedeferri, M.P.; Milano, P. The Anodic Oxidation of Titanium and Its Alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 3, 41–54. [Google Scholar]
  7. Geetha, M.; Singh, A.K.; Asokamani, R.; Gogia, A.K. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54, 397–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Osman, R.B.; Swain, M.V.; Atieh, M.; Ma, S.; Duncan, W. Ceramic implants (Y-TZP): Are they a viable alternative to titanium implants for the support of overdentures? A randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2014, 25, 1366–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Osman, R.B.; Morgaine, K.C.; Duncan, W.; Swain, M.V.; Ma, S. Patients’ perspectives on zirconia and titanium implants with a novel distribution supporting maxillary and mandibular overdentures: A qualitative study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2014, 25, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hashim, D.; Cionca, N.; Courvoisier, D.S.; Mombelli, A. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016, 20, 1403–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Depprich, R.; Zipprich, H.; Ommerborn, M.; Naujoks, C.; Wiesmann, H.-P.; Kiattavorncharoen, S.; Lauer, H.-C.; Meyer, U.; Kübler, N.R.; Handschel, J. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: An in vivo study. Head Face Med. 2008, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ozkurt, Z.; Kazazog, E. Zirconia Dental Implants: A Literature Review. J. Oral Implantol. 2011, 37, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reveron, H.; Fornabaio, M.; Palmero, P.; Fürderer, T.; Adolfsson, E.; Lughi, V.; Bonifacio, A.; Sergo, V.; Montanaro, L.; Chevalier, J. Towards long lasting zirconia-based composites for dental implants: Transformation induced plasticity and its consequence on ceramic reliability. Acta Biomater. 2017, 48, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Piconi, C.; Maccauro, G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cionca, N.; Hashim, D.; Mombelli, A. Zirconia dental implants: Where are we now, and where are we heading? Periodontol. 2000 2017, 73, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bergschmidt, P.; Bader, R.; Ganzer, D.; Hauzeur, C.; Lohmann, C.H.; Krüger, A.; Rüther, W.; Tigani, D.; Rani, N.; Esteve, J.L.; et al. Prospective multi-centre study on a composite ceramic femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: Five-year clinical and radiological outcomes. Knee 2015, 22, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, Y.; Liu, K.; Deng, J.; Ye, J.; Ai, F.; Ouyang, H.; Wu, T.; Jia, J.; Cheng, X.; Wang, X. 3D printed zirconia ceramic hip joint with precise structure and broad-spectrum antibacterial properties. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 5977–5987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roy, T.; Choudhury, D.; Ghosh, S.; Bin Mamat, A.; Pingguan-Murphy, B. Improved friction and wear performance of micro dimpled ceramic-on-ceramic interface for hip joint arthroplasty. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rupp, F.; Liang, L.; Geis-Gerstorfer, J.; Scheideler, L.; Hüttig, F. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 40–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Antonio Scarano Carlo FDi Manlio Quaranta, A.P. Bone Response To Zirconia Ceramic Implants: An Experimental Study In Rabbits. J. Oral. Implantol. 2003, 4, 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kohal, R.J.; Schwindling, F.S.; Bächle, M.; Spies, B.C. Peri-implant bone response to retrieved human zirconia oral implants after a 4-year loading period: A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of 22 cases. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2016, 104, 1622–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ledet, E.H.; Liddle, B.; Kradinova, K.; Harper, S. Smart implants in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes: A review. Innov. Entrep. Health 2018, 5, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hassani, F.A.; Shi, Q.; Wen, F.; He, T.; Haroun, A.; Yang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Lee, C. Smart Materials for Smart Healthcare—Moving from Sensors and Actuators to Self- sustained Nanoenergy Nanosystems Faezeh Arab Hassani. Smart Mater. Med. 2020, 1, 92–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sehrawat, D.; Gill, N.S. Smart sensors: Analysis of different types of IoT sensors. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India, 23–25 April 2019; pp. 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chorsi, M.T.; Curry, E.J.; Chorsi, H.T.; Das, R.; Baroody, J.; Purohit, P.K.; Ilies, H.; Nguyen, T.D. Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Sensors and Actuators. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1802084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Andreu-Perez, J.; Leff, D.R.; Ip, H.M.D.; Yang, G.Z. From Wearable Sensors to Smart Implants-Toward Pervasive and Personalized Healthcare. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 2750–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wachs, R.A.; Ellstein, D.; Drazan, J.; Healey, C.P.; Uhl, R.L.; Connor, K.A.; Ledet, E.H. Elementary Implantable Force Sensor: For Smart Orthopaedic Implants. Adv. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 2, 12477. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bartolomeu, F.; Costa, M.M.; Alves, N.; Miranda, G.; Silva, F. Additive manufacturing of NiTi-Ti6Al4V multi-material cellular structures targeting orthopedic implants. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2020, 134, 106208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schwiebert, L.; Gupta, S.K.S.; Weinmann, J. Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Rome, Italy, 16–21 June 2001; pp. 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yazdandoost, K.Y.; Kohno, R. Wireless Communications for Body Implanted Medical Device. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 11–14 December 2007. [Google Scholar]
  31. Anacleto, P.; Mendes, P.M.; Gultepe, E.; Gracias, D.H. Micro antennas for implantable medical devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG), Braga, Portugal, 20–23 February 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moura, C.G.; Faria, D.; Carvalho, O.; Pereira, R.; Cerqueira, M.; Nascimento, R.; Silva, F. Laser printing of silver-based micro-wires in ZrO2 substrate for smart implant applications. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 131, 106416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anacleto, P.; Mendes, P.M.; Gultepe, E.; Gracias, D.H. 3D small antenna for energy harvesting applications on implantable micro-devices. In Proceedings of the Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (LAPC), Loughborough, UK, 12–13 November 2012; Volume 1, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Panyala, N.R.; Peña-méndez, E.M.; Havel, J. Silver or silver nanoparticles: A hazardous threat to the environment and human health? J. Appl. Biomed. 2008, 6, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moura, C.G.; Carvalho, O.; Magalhães, V.H.; Pereira, R.; Cerqueira, M.; Gonçalves, L.; Nascimento, R.; Silva, F. Laser printing of micro-electronic communication systems for smart implants applications. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 128, 106211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abid, A.; O’Brien, J.M.; Bensel, T.; Cleveland, C.; Booth, L.; Smith, B.R.; Langer, R.; Traverso, G. Wireless power transfer to millimeter-sized gastrointestinal electronics validated in a swine model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep46745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Agarwal, A.; Shapero, A.; Rodger, D.; Humayun, M.; Tai, Y.-C.; Emami, A. A wireless, low-drift, implantable intraocular pressure sensor with parylene-on-oil encapsulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), San Diego, CA, USA, 8–11 April 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aldaoud, A.; Redoute, J.M.; Ganesan, K.; Rind, G.S.; John, S.E.; Ronayne, S.M.; Opie, N.L.; Garrett, D.J.; Prawer, S. Near-field wireless power transfer to stent-based biomedical implants. IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microw. Med. Biol. 2018, 2, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. ISO 13356:2015; Implants for Surgery—Ceramic Materials Based on Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia (Y-TZP). Technical committee ISO/TC 150/SC 1. 2015.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a hip implant with smart components printed on its surface in different views, highlighting the antenna. Modified from [32].
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a hip implant with smart components printed on its surface in different views, highlighting the antenna. Modified from [32].
Applsci 12 09333 g001
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of silver powder: (a) 25,000× and (b) 100,000× of amplification.
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of silver powder: (a) 25,000× and (b) 100,000× of amplification.
Applsci 12 09333 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the antenna design and manufacturing (ac), highlighting the laser strategy used to create the micro-cavity.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the antenna design and manufacturing (ac), highlighting the laser strategy used to create the micro-cavity.
Applsci 12 09333 g003
Figure 4. Photographs of the U.FL cable with signal and ground terminations separated (a) and of the fabricated antenna ready for testing (b).
Figure 4. Photographs of the U.FL cable with signal and ground terminations separated (a) and of the fabricated antenna ready for testing (b).
Applsci 12 09333 g004
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the antenna testing setup. The transmitter antenna is distanced 25 cm from the fabricated antenna, which is placed between two 1 cm-thick beef steaks to approximate the test conditions for human body implantation.
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the antenna testing setup. The transmitter antenna is distanced 25 cm from the fabricated antenna, which is placed between two 1 cm-thick beef steaks to approximate the test conditions for human body implantation.
Applsci 12 09333 g005
Figure 6. Micro-cavity of the antenna created by laser on zirconia surface.
Figure 6. Micro-cavity of the antenna created by laser on zirconia surface.
Applsci 12 09333 g006
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of (a) Micro-cavity before the silver-based antenna printing, obtained after laser machining; (b,b1) Micro-antenna printed into the cavity through laser sintering process, 800×.
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of (a) Micro-cavity before the silver-based antenna printing, obtained after laser machining; (b,b1) Micro-antenna printed into the cavity through laser sintering process, 800×.
Applsci 12 09333 g007
Figure 8. S11 (top) and S21 (bottom) parameters measured through the VNA for a frequency range of 1 to 5 GHz, which demonstrates that the antenna is better suited to operate at 2.4 GHz.
Figure 8. S11 (top) and S21 (bottom) parameters measured through the VNA for a frequency range of 1 to 5 GHz, which demonstrates that the antenna is better suited to operate at 2.4 GHz.
Applsci 12 09333 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moura, C.G.; Dinis, H.; Carvalho, O.; Mendes, P.M.; Nascimento, R.M.; Silva, F.S. A Novel Approach for Micro-Antenna Fabrication on ZrO2 Substrate Assisted by Laser Printing for Smart Implants. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189333

AMA Style

Moura CG, Dinis H, Carvalho O, Mendes PM, Nascimento RM, Silva FS. A Novel Approach for Micro-Antenna Fabrication on ZrO2 Substrate Assisted by Laser Printing for Smart Implants. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(18):9333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moura, C. G., H. Dinis, O. Carvalho, P. M. Mendes, R. M. Nascimento, and F. S. Silva. 2022. "A Novel Approach for Micro-Antenna Fabrication on ZrO2 Substrate Assisted by Laser Printing for Smart Implants" Applied Sciences 12, no. 18: 9333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop