Next Article in Journal
Hydrochemical Characteristics and Water Quality Assessment of Irkutsk Reservoir (Baikal Region, Russia)
Previous Article in Journal
Proposed Flood Mitigation Using Backwater in Highly Developed Watersheds with Consideration of Crop Calendars and Spatial Resolution: Toward Consensus Formation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 15
Issue 23
10.3390/w15234141
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copper Nanoparticles Coupled with Fine-Powdered Active Carbon-Modified Ceramic Membranes for Improved Filtration Performance in a Membrane Bioreactor

by
Qi Qiu
1,2,
Mingchang Gao
2,
Changtao Shao
3,
Shaofang Sun
4,*,
Yusen Liu
5 and
Huawei Zhang
1,*
1
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China
2
School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
3
Shandong Industrial Ceramics Research and Design Institute, Zibo 255031, China
4
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
5
Bureau of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Laixi, Qingdao 266520, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(23), 4141; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234141
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 23 November 2023 / Accepted: 25 November 2023 / Published: 29 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Separation Technology for Water Purification and Power Generation Using Water)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Membrane fouling is a key factor limiting the application of a membrane bioreactor (MBR), and membrane-surface modification holds the potential to control membrane fouling and solves this problem. In the research, novel nanocomposite membranes were designed and fabricated using antimicrobial copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) coupled with powdered active carbon (PAC) to mitigate membrane fouling. The successful coating was confirmed by SEM, XRD, and FTIR analysis. Compared with a pristine membrane, the functionalization of CuNPs and PAC improved the hydrophilicity of the modified membrane but led to a lower permeate flux. The result of antimicrobial adhesion experiments showed that the modified M-CuOC displayed high antibacterial activity with the bacteria count decreased by 72%. In MBR operation, the modified M-CuOC leads to the removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD) increasing to 93%, with better filtration performance under a lower TMP rise. The fouling-resistance analysis demonstrated that, although the intrinsic membrane resistance of modified M-CuOC slightly increased, the reversible and irreversible fouling resistances obviously decreased by 45% and 90%. Moreover, the membrane flux recovery efficiency of the modified M-CuOC also increased by 35%. Overall, these results indicated that, in addition to an improvement in antifouling performance, the functionalization of CuNPs and PAC also enhanced the membrane flux recovery efficiency, revealing a good antifouling potential in a practical application.

1. Introduction

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs), as an integration of activated sludge and membrane filtration process, have been widely employed for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment over the past three decades owing to simple operation, small space requirement, and less residual sludge [1,2,3,4]. The treatment performance of MBRs relied highly on the synergism between the membrane and feed solution. Therefore, the physicochemical properties of membranes have an important impact on the performance of MBRs. Ceramic membranes are recognized to be better than organic polymeric membranes for the MBR treatment of various wastewaters because of their high mechanical strength, strong hydrophilicity, and excellent chemical stability [5,6]. However, like organic polymeric membranes, ceramic membranes also struggle with membrane fouling during operation, which restricts their applications [7,8].
Membrane fouling mainly occurs due to the adsorption or accumulation of pollutants and microorganisms on the membrane surface or pores and, then, subsequent formation of the cake layer [9,10,11]. The formation of the cake layer will result in the decline of permeate flux or the evaluation of the transmembrane pressure. Strategies for controlling membrane fouling of ceramic membranes include pretreatment of feed solutions, regulation of operating parameters, and surface modification of ceramic membranes, in which the surface-modification method can regulate the surface structures and physicochemical properties of ceramic membranes to improve ceramic membranes’ water flux and fouling alleviation [12,13,14]. Therefore, surface modification of ceramic membrane technology has attracted more and more attention in recent years.
Many studies have demonstrated that predeposition of micro- or nanomaterials, including carbon based [15,16] and metal based (e.g., Ag, Au, and CuO) [17,18,19], on the surfaces of ceramic membranes can regulate topography and hydrophobic and hydrophilic behavior, as well as antifouling/biofouling performance. Among these materials applied, carbon-based materials attracted increasing attention in controlling membrane fouling owing to their abundance on Earth, good absorption ability, and great resistance toward acids and bases. For example, activated carbon [20], granular activated carbon (GAC) [21], reduced graphene oxide(rGO) [22], and carbon nanotubes (CNT) [23] have been deposited on surfaces of ceramic membranes to enhance membrane performance. Jafari et al. [20] demonstrated that the predeposition of activated carbon on tubular ceramic membranes could significantly enhance the removal efficiency of oil during the treatment of oily wastewater. Tran et al. [24] synthesized carbon-nanotube-modified tubular ceramic membranes to filter wastewater with phenol and found that the permeability of the modified ceramic membrane and the removal of phenol are greatly higher than the pristine ceramic membrane. This result was due to the high specific surface area and stronger adsorption ability of the carbon nanotube. Notably, Song et al. [25] found that the deposition of reduced graphene oxide on the surfaces of ceramic membranes improved the hydrophobicity of membranes and might compromise the permeability of the membrane. Moreover, owing to the adsorption of carbon materials, microbes may enrich on the membrane surace and aggravate membrane biofouling, leading to an increase its fouling resistance.
Recently, several studies have reported that the immobilization of metal nanoparticles (e.g., Ag [12,26], Cu [27], and Au [28]) with antibacterial activity on the surfaces of membranes is a good way to mitigate biofouling [29]. Compared with other metal nanoparticles, copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) with high antibacterial activity and relatively low cost attract increasing attention [30]. It has been well-documented that blending CuNPs in the casting solution can adjust the surface roughness, porosity, wettability behavior, and antifouling/biofouling properties of polymeric membranes [31,32,33]. In addition, Lv et al. [34] found that CuNPs could improve the hydrophilicity of ceramic membranes due to the presence of a surface hydroxyl group. Hence, the deposition of CuNPs on carbon-modified ceramic membranes has the potential to alleviate membrane biofouling and compromise the improvement of hydrophobicity.
The purpose of this study is to prepare copper nanoparticles coupled with fine powdered active carbon (CuNPs@AC)-modified ceramic membranes and to investigate the performance of modified ceramic membranes. First, CuNPs@AC-modified ceramic membranes were prepared via the modified sol–gel impregnation calcination method, and the physicochemical characteristic of the prepared membranes was analyzed. Second, the antibacterial experiment was conducted to evaluate the antifouling property of the modified membranes. Then, to study the long-term performance of the modified membranes, the membrane bioreactors with modified membranes were constructed to treat synthetic wastewater. Finally, the influence of physical cleaning and acid cleaning on the modified membrane flux was assessed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

Copper nitrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O), citric acid (C6H8O7), sodium acetate (C2H3NaO2), and potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Powder activated carbon (PAC) was supplied by Green Source Co., Ltd. (Langfang, China) and the details can be found in Table A1. The ceramic membrane marked as M0 with the effective filtration size of 120 mm × 80 mm × 6 mm was provided by the Advanced Ceramic Research Institute of the Zibo High-tech Industrial Development Zone (Zibo, China). The composition and characteristic parameters of the ceramic membrane are shown in Table A2. Unless otherwise specified, ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm) prepared by a Milli-Q system was used for solution preparation.

2.2. Membrane Modification and Characterization

The modified membrane was fabricated via a modified sol–gel impregnation calcination and deposition method (Figure 1). First, the base membranes were dipped into the mixture solution of 0.5 mol/L Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and 1.2 mol/L C6H8O7 with the reaction for 1.5 h, and the obtained membranes were dried over 24 h at 60 °C in oven. Second, the modified membranes were placed into a muffle furnace and treated at 750 °C for 2 h with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. Then, the CuNPs@AC-modified ceramic membranes were prepared through a vacuum-suction method. In brief, one side of the prepared CuNPs-modified ceramic membrane was sealed, and the opposite end was linked to a vacuum pump. Then, the modified ceramic membrane was added to 1g/L of fine-powered active carbon solution and sucked by the vacuum pump. And then, the treated membrane was dried over 24 h at 60 °C in a vacuum. Finally, the obtained CuNPs@AC-modified ceramic membranes (M-CuOC) were calcined at 200 °C for 2 h. In addition, single nanocopper particles or micro-fine-powered activated carbon-modified ceramic membranes were also prepared using the same method and were labeled as M-CuO and MC.
The surface morphology and elements of the virgin and the modified ceramic membranes were analyzed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Phenom Prem, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray scattering (EDX) spectrometer. A powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8 Advance, Saarbrucken, Germany) was used to investigate the crystal structure of the in situ CuNPs. The Fourier transform infrared spectra were obtained using a Fourier infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Nicolet is50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The hydrophobicity of different membranes was assessed using contact-angle measurements (DSA 30, KRUSS, Hamburg, Germany). The contact angle was determined at 5.0 s after a droplet (2 μL of DI water) evenly spread on the membrane surface. Twenty random locations on the tested membranes were measured for each evaluation.

2.3. Membrane Performance

2.3.1. Anti-Biofouling Performance Evaluation

Static antibacterial assays were conducted, referring to previous studies [32], using E. coli as the model bacteria. Specifically, bacteria cultures were reared for 24 h in lysogeny broth (LB) at 37 °C; then, the bacteria suspension was diluted with fresh LB medium and further cultivated to the exponential phase (determined by a growth curve). The culture was centrifuged and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times to separate the cells from the culture medium. Finally, the bacteria were resuspended and diluted with PBS to a concentration of 106 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU·mL−1) for later use. Membrane samples (1 cm × 1 cm) were installed in custom-made membrane holders, and then, these holders were placed in the prepared bacteria suspension at 37 °C with a rotary shaker (200 rpm) for 10 h. After this, membrane samples were withdrawn and inoculated onto an LB solid medium, then were cultured for 12 h under 37 °C to count the bacteria colonies.

2.3.2. Membrane-Bioreactor Setup

As shown in Figure A1, the MBR has a working volume of 50 L. The CM membranes with an effective area of 0.0192 m2 were immersed in the bioreactor vertically and run with the peristaltic pump. An air diffuser was set under the membrane module to provide continuous aeration to maintain the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in the range of 3–5 mg/L. The collection of effluent was controlled by a timer with the mode of 10 min on/2 min off, and the water outlet was equipped with a pressure sensor and paperless recorder to record the change of TMP in real time. The activated sludge inoculated in the bioreactor was obtained from the secondary sedimentation tank of the Sewage Treatment Plant in Jinan, China. The water quality of synthetic wastewater and the operating conditions of the MBR are shown in Table A3 and Figure A1. During the experiments, the mixed liquid–suspended solid (MLSS) was maintained at 3200 mg/L; the HRT was 12 h. The constant flux of 2.08 L/h was controlled through a peristaltic pump, and the TMP was recorded at the scheduled time. After cleaning, the cleaned membranes were returned to the MBR system. The next filtration run then began. The time taken for the membrane to reach its cutoff TMP was termed the filtration period.

2.4. Membrane-Fouling Resistances and Cleaning

2.4.1. Membrane-Fouling Resistances

The resistance-in-series model based on Darcy’s law was used to analyze the fouling resistance [35]. The fouling resistance could be expressed as:
R t = T M P μ J = R m + R r + R i r
where Rt represents the total membrane-fouling resistance (m−1), Rm is the intrinsic membrane resistance (m−1), Rr and Rir are defined as reversible and irreversible fouling resistance (m−1), respectively, TMP is transmembrane pressure (kPa), μ is the dynamic viscosity for feed solution, and J is the permeation flux.
In our experiments, the permeation flux of the virgin membrane with DI water was recorded as J0; the permeation flux of the modified membrane at the end of the operation was defined as Jf. Therefore, the Rt and Rm could be calculated as the following equation:
R t = T M P μ J f
R m = T M P μ J 0
In addition, the permeation flux of the modified membrane after rinsing with deionized water was recorded as Jg, and the reversible fouling resistance was counted as follows:
R r = T M P μ J f − T M P μ J g
After the calculation of Rt, Rm, and Rr, the irreversible fouling resistance was obtained by subtracting Rm and Rr from Rt, as shown in the following equation:
R i r = R t − R m − R r

2.4.2. Membrane Cleaning

After the operation, the two-step membrane-rinsing method was performed. Briefly, the contaminated membrane was rinsed with deionized water with 1 L/min to clean the concentration polarization layer, and then, the contaminated membrane was further washed using a HCl solution (pH = 2.5) for 3 h to remove the gel layer, followed by washing with deionized water to a neutral pH. The permeation fluxes of different membranes with DI water were computed to evaluate the permeability recovery after each rinsing process, where the permeability recovery was defined as the following equation:
the   permeability   recovery = J f J 0
where Jf and J0 were the permeation fluxes of the fouled and pristine membranes, respectively.

2.5. Analytical Methods

The COD and NH4+-N concentration of the influent and effluent was measured by standard methods [36]. The pH of the solutions was monitored by a pH meter (Mettler Toledo Pro2Go, Zurich, Switzerland). A DO meter was applied to measure the DO concentration and temperature. The measurement was performed at least three times with the standard deviation of less than 10%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Membrane-Surface Characteristics

The membrane-surface morphology was investigated by SEM analysis. As shown in Figure 2a, the primitive ceramic membrane surface was porous, smooth, and shiny with some large particles. Compared with the morphology of the pristine membrane, the membrane surface of MC was covered with some irregular particles and became rougher, which indicated that micro-fine-powered active carbon was successfully deposited on the surface of the ceramic membrane (Figure 2b). After CuNPs immobilization, the surface of M-CuO was relatively dense, and some clusters of spherical nanoparticles were observed on the membrane surface (Figure 2c). As presented in Figure 2d, irregular particles and nanoparticles were present on the surface of the M-CuOc. Compared with MC and M-CuO, M-CuOc was more porous and ordered. The EDS analysis of the different membranes suggested that the content of the C and Cu elements in M-CuOc was obviously higher than that in the pristine membrane (Table A4), further confirming the successful deposition of C and Cu elements on the membrane surface.
The XRD patterns of the pristine membrane and modified ceramic membranes are shown in Figure 3a to investigate the membrane’s chemical composition and lattice structure. As presented in Figure 3a, the characteristic peaks of rhombohedral Al2O3 were observed in the virgin ceramic membrane (M0). Compared with the XRD patterns of M0, the diffraction peaks of MCuO and M-CuOc at 35.6° (11-1) and 38.7° (111) were the characteristic peaks of the rhombohedral CuO (JCPDS 48–1548) [37,38]. Similar diffraction peaks were also found in the copper oxide-modified ceramic hollow-fiber membrane, suggesting that CuO was successfully deposited on the surface of the ceramic membrane.
Figure 3b shows the FTIR spectrum of the pristine membrane and the modified CuNPs@AC ceramic membranes. Compared with the FTIR spectrum of the pristine membrane, the vibrational peaks at 450–500 cm−1, 1450 cm−1, 1626 cm−1, and 3400–3500 cm−1 were seen in the FTIR spectrum of the prepared CuNPs@AC membranes. According to previous studies [39,40,41], the bands at 450–500 cm−1, 1450 cm−1, and 1626 cm−1 were indexed to Cu=O structure, C=O, and C=C groups, demonstrating that CuNPs and the MFPAC functional layer were successfully covered on the surfaces of ceramic membranes. Moreover, the presence of a band at 3400–3500 cm−1 was ascribed to hydroxyl groups or absorbed H2O, indicating that the prepared CuNPs@AC-modified ceramic membranes had good hydrophilicity.
To analyze the membrane-surface hydrophilicity of different membranes, the water contact angle was measured. As shown in 4a, the contact angle of the modified ceramic membranes was significantly increased from 40.0° to 79.8° when the micro-fine-powered activated carbon was coated on the surface of the virgin membrane. Previous studies have demonstrated that a large contact angle indicates a relatively high hydrophobicity of the membrane and the mean severe membrane-fouling potential during filtration. Hence, the deposited activated carbon on the surface of the membrane might aggravate fouling, which was not conducive to membrane filtration. Notably, the function of the copper nanoparticles modifying the membrane became more hydrophilic with a lower contact angle of 22.7°. This result could be ascribed to the hydrophilic nature of the surface hydroxyl group of CuO. When the surface of the membrane was covered by copper nanoparticles and fine powdered active carbon, the water contact angle reduced from 40.0° to 32.6°. This suggested that compared with the virgin membrane, the CuNPs@AC-modified ceramic membranes were relatively hydrophilic and beneficial for alleviating the membrane fouling in filtration.
In addition, the permeate flux of the varied membranes was measured under constant pressure. As shown in Figure 4b, the permeate flux of the virgin membrane was 352.63 LMH, and the permeate flux of the modified membrane showed varying degrees of decrease, in which the permeate fluxes of MC, M-CuO, and M-CuOC were 306.5 LMH, 269.1 LMH, and 207.4 LMH, 13%, 23%, and 41% lower than that of the pristine membrane, respectively. Similar results have been reported in previous studies, which might be ascribed to the fact that the modification process increased the surface-layer thickness resulting in the mass-transfer-resistance enlargement. Moreover, M-CuO and M-CuOC displayed a lower permeate flux than MC because the CuO nanoparticles might congest the pore of the membrane, also leading to increased mass-transfer resistance.
The stability of the modified components loaded on the membrane surface is an important factor for the sustainable operation of the membranes. Therefore, the TDS values of pure water after running for 5 d in the presence of different membranes were investigated. As shown in Figure 4b, the TDS values in the case of MC, M-CuO, and M-CuOC were 37.9 mgL−1, 7 mgL−1, and 10 mgL−1, and obviously higher than that (3 mgL−1) of the pristine membrane, indicating that the stability of the modified components loaded on the membrane surface increased following the order of MC < M-CuOC < M-CuO. This result could be attributed to the fact that the calcination process is beneficial for the modified elements more strongly loaded on the membrane surface.

3.2. Antibacterial Activity Assays

The adhesion of organisms on the surface is one of the main causes of membrane fouling. Therefore, the antimicrobial adhesion experiments were carried out to evaluate the anti-biofouling property of the modified membrane, in which E. coli were used as model organisms. After membrane samples were immersed in an E. coli bacterial suspension for 10 h, membrane samples were withdrawn and inoculated onto an LB solid medium within 12 h to quantify bacteria counts. As presented in Figure 5, the bacteria count in the presence of pristine CM and modified Mc was approximately 5.1–5.3 log, indicating that the pristine CM and modified Mc exhibited minimal antibacterial activity. Specifically, the modified M-CuO and M-CuOC showed high antibacterial activity for E. coli. As indicated in Figure 5, the bacteria count after filtration through modified M-CuO and M-CuOC was 67% and 72% lower than that of the pristine CM. This result clearly demonstrated that the layer of CuO nanoparticles on the surface obviously improved the antibacterial activity of the modified membrane, which highlighted the application potential to mitigate membrane biofouling.

3.3. MBR-Treatment Performance

3.3.1. TMP Analysis of Different MBR Systems

Several studies have proven that the variation of TMP can indirectly reflect the degree of membrane fouling in the case of constant flux. Hence, the TMP of pristine CM and modified CM was monitored (Figure 6). Notably, the initial TMP values of modified MC, M-CuO, and M-CuOC were 24 Kpa, 22 Kpa, and 24 KPa, respectively, which was higher than that of pristine CM (21 Kpa). This finding was consistent with the lower permeate flux of modified CM (Figure 4b). A similar consequence has been reported in a previous study [41,42], which was due to the following reasons: (1) the modified layer on the surface of the membrane was slightly compact and (2) the modified nanosized power might block the membrane pores. As shown in Figure 6, the increased rate of TMP of pristine CM was obviously higher than that of the modified membrane. The TMP of pristine CM continuously increased to 35 KPa within 150 h; meanwhile, the TMP of modified MC, M-CuO, and M-CuOC only enlarged to 33, 27.35, and 25.2 KPa, respectively. Notably, the TMP of CuNPs@AC-modified CM first was maintained around 24 Kpa during the first 50 h; then, it slowly increased to 27 KPa during 199 h followed by sharply rising to 35 kPa during the operation of 200–250 h. Therefore, the filtration period of MBR systems was set to be 199 h in order to prolong the working time of modified membranes. These results indicated that CuNPs@AC-modified CM showed a lower fouling rate than the pristine CM, which was in line with the result of antibacterial activity assays and further certified the good antifouling ability of CuNPs@AC-modified CM.

3.3.2. Removal Efficiency of Pollutants in an MBR System

From the aforementioned results, it could be seen that the antifouling property of CuNPs@AC-modified CM (M-CuOC) was superior to other modified membranes. Hence, the CuNPs@AC-modified CM (M-CuOC) was selected as the optical modified membrane to assess the removal performance of a different MBR system. The concentrations of COD and NH4+-N in the influent and effluent in the pristine CM and CuNPs@AC-modified CM system were measured during the operation of 31 d. The COD removal efficiency of CuNPs@AC-modified CM MBR was 92% slightly higher than that (85%) of virgin CM MBR. As seen in Figure 7a, the COD concentration in the influent was stable at 390 ± 5 mg/L for two MBR systems, and in the effluent from CuNPs@AC-modified CM was about 32 ± 2 mg/L, significantly lower than that (58 ± 4 mg/L) from the virgin CM. According to previous studies [12,27], the rise in COD removal efficiency for the modified M-CuOC might be ascribed to the adsorption of the fine powdered active carbon. The NH4+-N concentrations in the influent and effluent were 37 ± 2 mg/L and 3 ± 0.5 mg/L for the two MBR systems, indicating that the removal efficiency of NH4+-N was comparable in the two MBR systems (Figure 7b). In addition, the concentrations of MLSS in pristine CM and CuNPs@AC-modified CM systems were 3620 mg/L and 3590 mg/L, respectively. These results indicated that the CuNPs@AC-modified CM had little impact on the property of active sludge. Moreover, the removal efficiency of COD and NH4+-N in the modified M-CuOC was compared with previous studies, where the MBRs were applied to municipal wastewater. As shown in Figure 7, the COD removal was close to that in previous studies, while the removal of NH4+-N was slightly lower than that of previous studies. This difference might be ascribed to the higher influent NH4+-N concentration in this study. Considering the positive effect of CuNPs@AC-modified CM on fouling reduction, it could be inferred that CuNPs@AC-modified CM would be highly effective in MBR application for wastewater treatment.

3.4. Membrane Fouling and Cleaning

To assess the antifouling property of modified membranes, the fouling resistances of pristine and modified membranes were analyzed. As shown in Figure 8a, the intrinsic membrane resistance and the reversible and irreversible fouling resistances of the virgin membrane after 199 h operation were 0.22 × 1012 m−1, 6.55 × 1012 m−1, and 0.98 × 1012 m−1, respectively. Compared with the original membrane, the intrinsic membrane resistance of modified MC, M-CuO, and M-CuOC increased to 0.29 × 1012 m−1, 0.34 × 1012 m−1, and 0.39 × 1012 m−1, respectively. This result was in accord with the pure-water flux experiment, owing to some membrane pores might be blocked during the modified process. As can be seen from Figure 8a, the reversible and irreversible fouling resistances of modified membranes both decreased to a certain extent. Specifically, the M-CuO had a better antifouling property than MC, which could be due to the high antibacterial activity of CuO nanoparticles to retard microbe adsorption on the membrane surface. Remarkedly, the reversible and irreversible fouling resistances of M-CuOC decreased to 3.66 × 1012 m−1 and 0.1 × 1012 m−1 and were 45% and 90% lower than that of the pristine membrane, respectively. Generally, the functionalization of CuO nanoparticles and fine powdered active carbon outstandingly improved the antifouling performance of the modified membrane.
The membrane flux recovery efficiency after the two-step membrane-rinsing method was explored to evaluate the durability of the modified membrane. As shown in Figure 8b, the membrane flux recovery efficiency after the same cleaning process increased in the following order, M0 < M-CuO < MC < M-CuOC. The flux recovery efficiencies of modified MC, M-CuO, and M-CuOC were 88%, 84%, and 92%, with 27.5%, 21.7%, and 35% higher than that of the virgin membrane (68%), respectively, which suggests that membrane modification raised the percentage of reversible fouling. This result indicated that, in addition to improvement in antifouling performance, the functionalization of CuO nanoparticles and fine powdered active carbon also enhanced the membrane flux recovery efficiency, revealing a good antifouling potential in practical application.

4. Conclusions

This paper proposed a simple and adaptable ceramic-membrane modification method via sol–gel impregnation and deposition of functionalization of CuO nanoparticles and fine powdered active carbon layer to resist membrane fouling, and their performances in an MBR system to treat wastewater were explored. The physical and chemical properties of a modified membrane were investigated by SEM, FT-IR, and XRD analysis. The results suggested that the CuO nanoparticles and fine powdered active carbon were successfully coated on the surface of a virgin membrane, improving the hydrophilicity of the modified membrane. The result of antimicrobial adhesion experiments showed that the modified M-CuOC displayed high antibacterial activity with the bacteria count reducing by 72%. During the long-running process of MBR, the modified M-CuOC membrane improved the removal efficiency of COD, while the removal efficiency of NH4+-N was comparable for the modified M-CuOC and virgin membrane. Notably, the modified M-CuOC membrane exhibited a significantly slower increase in TMP compared to the pristine membrane, indicating better filtration performance with a lower TMP rise. The reversible and irreversible fouling resistances of the modified M-CuOC decreased by 45% and 90% compared with the virgin membrane, further certifying the good antifouling ability of the modified M-CuOC. Moreover, the membrane flux recovery efficiency of the modified M-CuOC after cleaning was 92%, which was 35% higher than that of the virgin membrane. Overall, these results clearly demonstrated that integrating CuO nanoparticles with fine powdered active carbon to modify a ceramic membrane was a highly desirable option for utilization in MBR applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.Q. and S.S.; methodology, Q.Q., M.G. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation Q.Q. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, Q.Q. and M.G.; project administration, H.Z.; supervision, H.Z. and C.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52300089, 52100088).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Changtao Shao was employed by the company Shandong Industrial Ceramics Research and Design Institute. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Characteristics of powder-activated carbon (PAC).
Table A1. Characteristics of powder-activated carbon (PAC).
SubjectCoarseness (Mesh)Iodine Absorb (mg/g)Hardness (%)Moisture (%)Ash (%)
Index0.5–1, 1–2, 2–4≥70098≤8≤5
Table A2. Characteristic parameters of the ceramic membrane.
Table A2. Characteristic parameters of the ceramic membrane.
SubjectNameThicknessPore SizeSizeConstituent MaterialsEffective Area
IndexCeramic membrane0.25 mm0.1 µm12Al2O3, SiO2, TiO20.0192 m2
Table A3. The water quality of synthetic wastewater.
Table A3. The water quality of synthetic wastewater.
SubjectT (°C)pHCOD (mg/L)NH4+-N (mg/L)TP (mg/L)
Index15–357.20–8.31380–40035–455–7
Table A4. Element contents on the membrane surface determined by EDS.
Table A4. Element contents on the membrane surface determined by EDS.
C (%)O (%)Al (%)Cu (%)Yb (%)
M014.5144.7638.10-2.63
M-CuOC22.6938.4736.070.452.32
Water 15 04141 g0a1
Figure A1. MBR device.
Figure A1. MBR device.
Water 15 04141 g0a1

References

  1. Girón, H.I.; Ruiz, L.M.; Pérez, J.I.; Gómez, M.A. Influence of Discontinuous On-Line Ultrasonic Irradiation Applied in Ultrafiltration MBR Systems over the Physical-Chemical and Biological Characteristics of the Activated Sludge. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2023, 193, 109527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zang, L.; Yang, X.-L.; Xu, H.; Deng, Y.-J.; Yue, Z.-X.; Song, H.-L. Alleviating Membrane Fouling by Enhanced Bioelectricity Generation via Internal Reflux of Sludge Mixed Liquor in Microbial Fuel Cell-Membrane Bioreactor (MFC-MBR) Coupling System. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 673, 121495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Tian, Z.; Zheng, X. Balancing Sludge Reduction and Membrane Fouling Mitigation by Tuning Electrical Voltages of a Side-Flow Electrochemical Oxidation System during MBR Processing. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 425, 138712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ongena, S.; de Walle, A.V.; Mosquera-Romero, S.; Driesen, N.; Gutierrez, L.; Rabaey, K. Comparison of MBR and MBBR Followed by UV or Electrochemical Disinfection for Decentralized Greywater Treatment. Water Res. 2023, 235, 119818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gu, Q.; Ng, T.C.A.; Poh, W.; Kirk, C.H.; Lyu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Ng, H.Y. 3D Spray-Coated Gradient Profile Ceramic Membranes Enables Improved Filtration Performance in Aerobic Submerged Membrane Bioreactor. Water Res. 2022, 220, 118661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. López, J.; Reig, M.; Vecino, X.; Gibert, O.; Cortina, J.L. Comparison of Acid-Resistant Ceramic and Polymeric Nanofiltration Membranes for Acid Mine Waters Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maddela, N.R.; Torres, R.O.V. The Presence of Low Fouling-Causing Bacteria Can Lead to Decreased Membrane Fouling Potentials of Mixed Cultures. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, J.; Pan, H.; Bai, Z.; Huang, R.; Zheng, X.; Gao, S. Alleviated Membrane Fouling of Corundum Ceramic Membrane in MBR: As Compared with Alumina Membrane. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Teng, J.; Shen, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.-L.; He, Y.; Chen, J.; Lin, H. Effects of Molecular Weight Distribution of Soluble Microbial Products (SMPs) on Membrane Fouling in a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR): Novel Mechanistic Insights. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meng, F.; Zhang, S.; Oh, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Shin, H.-S.; Chae, S.-R. Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors: An Updated Review. Water Res. 2017, 114, 151–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Teng, J.; Zhang, M.; Leung, K.-T.; Chen, J.; Hong, H.; Lin, H.; Liao, B.-Q. A Unified Thermodynamic Mechanism Underlying Fouling Behaviors of Soluble Microbial Products (SMPs) in a Membrane Bioreactor. Water Res. 2019, 149, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, T.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Z. Antibiofouling Performance and Mechanisms of a Modified Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membrane in an MBR for Wastewater Treatment: Role of Silver@silica Nanopollens. Water Res. 2020, 176, 115749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gu, Q.; Ng, T.C.A.; Zang, W.; Zhang, L.; Lyu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ng, H.Y.; Wang, J. Surface Engineered Alumina Microfiltration Membranes Based on Rationally Constructed Core-Shell Particles. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 5951–5958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mustafa, G.; Wyns, K.; Buekenhoudt, A.; Meynen, V. Antifouling Grafting of Ceramic Membranes Validated in a Variety of Challenging Wastewaters. Water Res. 2016, 104, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dong, M.; Guo, J.; Liu, Q.; Zeng, J.; Xiong, X.; Gai, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y. Low-Pressure Carbon Nanotube Membrane with Different Surface Properties for the Removal of Organic Dyes and PPCPs. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Z.; Qi, J.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, H.; Han, B.; He, H.; He, M.; Ma, J. Graphitic Carbon Nitride Membranes Intercalated with Nano-Sized Fe-MOF for Enhanced Water Purification via Synergistic Separation and Fenton-like Processes. Chemosphere 2023, 340, 139937. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Yang, L.; Zhang, J.; Park, H.-D.; Li, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Gao, M. Catalytic Degradation of Bisphenol a (BPA) in Water by Immobilizing Silver-Loaded Graphene Oxide (GO-Ag) in Ultrafiltration Membrane with Finger-like Structure. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 474, 145577. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong, M.; Wang, B.; Xu, X.; Bin, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q. Rational Design of High-Performance Continuous Flow Catalytic Membrane Reactor Based on Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) Brush-Anchored Au Nanoparticles. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 662, 121002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.; Gao, N.; Han, F.; Mao, Y.; Tian, J. Immobilization of Nano-Cu on Ceramic Membrane by Dopamine Assisted Flowing Synthesis for Enhanced Catalysis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 326, 124781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jafari, B.; Abbasi, M.; Hashemifard, S.A.; Sillanpää, M. Elaboration and Characterization of Novel Two-Layer Tubular Ceramic Membranes by Coating Natural Zeolite and Activated Carbon on Mullite-Alumina-Zeolite Support: Application for Oily Wastewater Treatment. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2020, 8, 848–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Huang, R.; Guo, Y.; Yan, B.; Hao, X.; Li, J.; Xia, W.; Tian, J. Catalytic Ceramic Membrane Integrated with Granular Activated Carbon for Efficient Removal of Organic Pollutants. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 47, 102751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, G.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y. Biomimic Heterostructured Graphene Oxide Membranes via Supramolecular-Mediated Intercalation Assembly for Efficient Water Transport. Small 2022, 18, e2200461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rashed, A.O.; Merenda, A.; Kondo, T.; Lima, M.; Razal, J.; Kong, L.; Huynh, C.; Dumée, L.F. Carbon Nanotube Membranes–Strategies and Challenges towards Scalable Manufacturing and Practical Separation Applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 257, 117929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tran, D.T.; Thieffry, G.; Jacob, M.; Batiot-Dupeyrat, C.; Teychene, B. Modification of Tubular Ceramic Membranes with Carbon Nanotubes Using Catalytic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Water Sci. Technol. J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2015, 72, 1404–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Song, D.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, W.; Jia, B.; Wang, P.; Sun, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhai, X.; Qi, J.; Liu, C. Micro Fine Particles Deposition on Gravity-Driven Ultrafiltration Membrane to Modify the Surface Properties and Biofilm Compositions: Water Quality Improvement and Biofouling Mitigation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 393, 123270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.; Zhu, J.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Shao, J.; Li, H. High Transparent Ag NPs/PVC SERS Membrane Combined with Molecular Imprinting Technology for Selective Detection of Norfloxacin. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, J.; Dong, H.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Chu, D.; Xiang, S.; Hou, X.; Dong, Q.; Xiao, S.; Jin, Z.; et al. Graphene Shell-Encapsulated Copper-Based Nanoparticles (G@Cu-NPs) Effectively Activate Peracetic Acid for Elimination of Sulfamethazine in Water under Neutral Condition. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 441, 129895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.; Lin, Q.; Wang, D.; Yu, H.; He, W.; Jiang, W.; Liu, C.; Zhu, E.; LI, H. Synthesis of PVDF Membrane Loaded with Wrinkled Au NPs for Sensitive Detection of R6G. Talanta 2022, 249, 123676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Q.; Jiang, H.; Chen, R. Synthesis of ZIF-67 Derived Co-Based Catalytic Membrane for Highly Efficient Reduction of p-Nitrophenol. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022, 248, 117160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, H.; Kong, L.; Wang, Y. Enhancing the Hydrophilicity and Water Permeability of Polypropylene Membranes by Nitric Acid Activation and Metal Oxide Deposition. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 487, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ostadi, M.; Kamelian, F.S.; Mohammadi, T. Superhydrophilic Micro/Nano Hierarchical Functionalized-CuO/PVDF Nanocomposite Membranes with Ultra-Low Fouling/Biofouling Performance for Acetate Wastewater Treatment: MBR Application. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 676, 121591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, C.; Wang, Z.; He, Q.; Jackson, J.; Faria, A.F.; Zhang, W.; Song, D.; Ma, J.; Sun, Z. Facile Preparation of Anti-Biofouling Reverse Osmosis Membrane Embedded with Polydopamine-Nano Copper Functionality: Performance and Mechanism. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 658, 120721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Isawi, H. Evaluating the Performance of Different Nano-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Membranes for the Removal of Organic Pollutants from Wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, D.; Zhang, T.; Gutierrez, L.; Ma, J.; Croué, J.-P. Influence of Surface Properties of Filtration-Layer Metal Oxide on Ceramic Membrane Fouling during Ultrafiltration of Oil/Water Emulsion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4668–4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lin, C.-F.; Lin, A.Y.-C.; Sri Chandana, P.; Tsai, C.-Y. Effects of Mass Retention of Dissolved Organic Matter and Membrane Pore Size on Membrane Fouling and Flux Decline. Water Res. 2009, 43, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wasterwater, 23rd ed. Available online: https://www.wef.org/publications/publications/books/StandardMethods/ (accessed on 23 October 2023).
  37. Wang, S.; Tian, J.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, F.; Gao, S.; Shi, W.; Cui, F. Development of CuO Coated Ceramic Hollow Fiber Membrane for Peroxymonosulfate Activation: A Highly Efficient Singlet Oxygen-Dominated Oxidation Process for Bisphenol a Degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 256, 117783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, S.; Tian, J.; Jia, L.; Jia, J.; Shan, S.; Wang, Q.; Cui, F. Removal of Aqueous Organic Contaminants Using Submerged Ceramic Hollow Fiber Membrane Coupled with Peroxymonosulfate Oxidation: Comparison of CuO Catalyst Dispersed in the Feed Water and Immobilized on the Membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 618, 118707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sathiyavimal, S.; Vasantharaj, S.; Veeramani, V.; Saravanan, M.; Rajalakshmi, G.; Kaliannan, T.; Al-Misned, F.A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Green Chemistry Route of Biosynthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Psidium Guajava Leaf Extract and Their Antibacterial Activity and Effective Removal of Industrial Dyes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thandapani, G.; Arthi, K.; Pazhanisamy, P.; John, J.J.; Vinothini, C.; Rekha, V.; Santhanalakshmi, K.; Sekar, V. Green Synthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Spinacia Oleracea Leaf Extract and Evaluation of Biological Applications: Antioxidant, Antibacterial, Larvicidal and Biosafety Assay. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 34, 105248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Habibi, M.H.; Karimi, B. Application of Impregnation Combustion Method for Fabrication of Nanostructure CuO/ZnO Composite Oxide: XRD, FESEM, DRS and FTIR Study. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 1566–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Q.; Yu, Z.; Li, F.; Yang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Peng, Y.; Yang, X.; Zeng, G. A Novel Photocatalytic Membrane Decorated with RGO-Ag-TiO2 for Dye Degradation and Oil–Water Emulsion Separation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 761–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Water 15 04141 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the membrane-modification protocol.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the membrane-modification protocol.
Water 15 04141 g001
Water 15 04141 g002
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surface of the (a) M0, (b) MC, (c) M-CuO, and (d) M-CuOc.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surface of the (a) M0, (b) MC, (c) M-CuO, and (d) M-CuOc.
Water 15 04141 g002
Water 15 04141 g003
Figure 3. (a) XRD pattern of M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc, (b) FT-IR infrared pattern corresponding to M0 and M-CuOc samples.
Figure 3. (a) XRD pattern of M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc, (b) FT-IR infrared pattern corresponding to M0 and M-CuOc samples.
Water 15 04141 g003
Water 15 04141 g004
Figure 4. (a) Water contact angles for the M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc; (b) TDS and permeate flux of M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc.
Figure 4. (a) Water contact angles for the M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc; (b) TDS and permeate flux of M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc.
Water 15 04141 g004
Water 15 04141 g005
Figure 5. The bacteria count in LB solid medium in the presence of different membranes.
Figure 5. The bacteria count in LB solid medium in the presence of different membranes.
Water 15 04141 g005
Water 15 04141 g006
Figure 6. The variation of TMP for M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc.
Figure 6. The variation of TMP for M0, M-CuO, Mc, and M-CuOc.
Water 15 04141 g006
Water 15 04141 g007
Figure 7. The concentration and removal of (a) COD, and (b) NH4+-N in an MBR system with M0 and M-CuOc.
Figure 7. The concentration and removal of (a) COD, and (b) NH4+-N in an MBR system with M0 and M-CuOc.
Water 15 04141 g007
Water 15 04141 g008
Figure 8. Analysis of membrane fouling (a) and the flux recovery efficiency (b) for different membranes.
Figure 8. Analysis of membrane fouling (a) and the flux recovery efficiency (b) for different membranes.
Water 15 04141 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Q.; Gao, M.; Shao, C.; Sun, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H. Copper Nanoparticles Coupled with Fine-Powdered Active Carbon-Modified Ceramic Membranes for Improved Filtration Performance in a Membrane Bioreactor. Water 2023, 15, 4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234141

AMA Style

Qiu Q, Gao M, Shao C, Sun S, Liu Y, Zhang H. Copper Nanoparticles Coupled with Fine-Powdered Active Carbon-Modified Ceramic Membranes for Improved Filtration Performance in a Membrane Bioreactor. Water. 2023; 15(23):4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Qi, Mingchang Gao, Changtao Shao, Shaofang Sun, Yusen Liu, and Huawei Zhang. 2023. "Copper Nanoparticles Coupled with Fine-Powdered Active Carbon-Modified Ceramic Membranes for Improved Filtration Performance in a Membrane Bioreactor" Water 15, no. 23: 4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop