Towards a Data-Rich Era: A Bibliometric Analysis of Construction Management from 2000 to 2020
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Bibliometric Analysis
2.3. Integrative Analysis
3. Bibliometric Analysis Results
3.1. Overview of Articles
3.1.1. Time Distribution
3.1.2. Sources
3.1.3. Country Distributions and Connections
3.1.4. Highly Cited Papers
3.2. General Research Themes
3.2.1. Co-Citation Analysis of the References
3.2.2. General Research Themes Derived from Clusters
- (1)
- Theme 1: Modern technology
- (2)
- Theme 2: Waste management
- (3)
- Theme 3: Performance management
- (4)
- Theme 4: Risk management
- (5)
- Theme 5: Project management
- (6)
- Theme 6: Knowledge management
- (7)
- Theme 7: Organization management
3.3. Research Trend
3.3.1. Keyword Analysis
3.3.2. Research Trend Evolution
4. Integrative Analysis Results and Discussion
4.1. Types of Research Data
4.2. Data-Driven Approaches
4.3. Future Research Directions
4.3.1. Smart Construction
4.3.2. Sustainability-Based Development
4.3.3. Resilience-Based Planning and Management
4.3.4. Human-Centric Consideration
4.4. Challenges towards Data-Driven Research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Peng, Y.; Li, B. Construction of Listed Company Management Defense Indicators Based on Big Data and Embedded Network Technology of the Internet of Things. Soft Comput. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radosavljevic, M.; Bennett, J. Construction Management Strategies: A Theory of Construction Management; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Pietroforte, R.; Aboulezz, M.A. ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering: Review of the Years 1985–2002. J. Manag. Eng. 2005, 21, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Lu, Y.; Peh, L.C. A Review and Scientometric Analysis of Global Building Information Modeling (BIM) Research in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry. Buildings 2019, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biljecki, F. A Scientometric Analysis of Selected GIScience Journals. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2016, 30, 1302–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Darko, A.; Chan, A.P.C.; Adabre, M.A.; Edwards, D.J.; Hosseini, M.R.; Ameyaw, E.E. Artificial Intelligence in the AEC Industry: Scientometric Analysis and Visualization of Research Activities. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dima, A.; Bugheanu, A.M.; Dinulescu, R.; Potcovaru, A.M.; Stefanescu, C.A.; Marin, I. Exploring the Research Regarding Frugal Innovation and Business Sustainability through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, D.V.; Dima, A.; Radu, E.; Dobrotă, E.M.; Dumitrache, V.M. Bibliometric Analysis of the Green Deal Policies in the Food Chain. Amfiteatru Econ. 2022, 24, 410–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsharif, A.H.; Salleh, N.Z.M.; Baharun, R.; Abuhassna, H.; Hasheme, A.R. A Global Research Trends of Neuromarketing: 2015–2020. Rev. Comun. 2022, 81, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, C.; Ruan, T. Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Progress on Coastal Flooding 1995–2016. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 7, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alsharif, A.H.; Salleh, N.Z.M.; Pilelienė, L.; Abbas, A.F.; Ali, J. Current Trends in the Application of EEG in Neuromarketing: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sci. Ann. Econ. Bus. 2022, 69, 393–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.; Dong, J.; Hwang, B.G.; Ren, R.; Chen, Z. A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alsharif, A.H.; Salleh, N.Z.M.; Baharun, R.; Alharthi Rami Hashem, E.; Mansor, A.A.; Ali, J.; Abbas, A.F. Neuroimaging Techniques in Advertising Research: Main Applications, Development, and Brain Regions and Processes. Sustainaibility 2021, 13, 6488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betts, M.; Lansley, P. Construction Management and Economics: A Review of the First Ten Years. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1993, 11, 221–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sourani, A.; Sohail, M. The Delphi Method: Review and Use in Construction Management Research. Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 2015, 11, 54–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameyaw, E.E.; Hu, Y.; Shan, M.; Chan, A.P.C.; Le, Y. Application of Delphi Method in Construction Engineering and Management Research: A Quantitative Perspective. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2016, 22, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dainty, A. A Review and Critique of Construction Management Research Methods. In Proceedings of the Inaugural Construction Management and Economics ‘Past, Present and Future’ Conference CME25, Reading, UK, 16–18 July 2007; pp. 1533–1543. [Google Scholar]
- Brockmann, C. Construction Management: New Directions. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2013, 31, 1084–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Yuan, J.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Q. From Digital to Sustainable: A Scientometric Review of Smart City Literature between 1990 and 2019. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Soler, R.; Uribe-Toril, J.; De Pablo Valenciano, J. Worldwide Trends in the Scientific Production on Rural Depopulation, a Bibliometric Analysis Using Bibliometrix R-Tool. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H.; Torpie, R.J. The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science; Institute for Scientific Information Inc.: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1964; pp. 1–95. [Google Scholar]
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsharif, A.H.; Md Salleh, N.Z.; Baharun, R.; Rami Hashem, E.A. Neuromarketing Research in the Last Five Years: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1978620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.; Hou, J. The Structure and Dynamics of Cocitation Clusters: A Multiple-Perspective Cocitation Analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 1386–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jin, R.; Zou, P.X.W.; Piroozfar, P.; Wood, H.; Yang, Y.; Yan, L.; Han, Y. A Science Mapping Approach Based Review of Construction Safety Research. Saf. Sci. 2019, 113, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An Approach for Detecting, Quantifying, and Visualizing the Evolution of a Research Field: A Practical Application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory Field. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tam, C.M.; Zeng, S.X.; Deng, Z.M. Identifying Elements of Poor Construction Safety Management in China. Saf. Sci. 2004, 42, 569–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swan, J.; Scarbrough, H.; Robertson, M. The Construction of “Communities of Practice” in the Management of Innovation. Manag. Learn. 2002, 33, 477–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shen, L.Y.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Tam, L.; Ji, Y.B. Project Feasibility Study: The Key to Successful Implementation of Sustainable and Socially Responsible Construction Management Practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robichaud, L.B.; Anantatmula, V.S. Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction. J. Manag. Eng. 2011, 27, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, B.G.; Ng, W.J. Project Management Knowledge and Skills for Green Construction: Overcoming Challenges. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2013, 31, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, X. The Effect of Relationship Management on Project Performance in Construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, R.F.; Issa, R.R.A.; Ahrens, D. Management’s Perception of Key Performance Indicators for Construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2003, 129, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irizarry, J.; Karan, E.P.; Jalaei, F. Integrating BIM and GIS to Improve the Visual Monitoring of Construction Supply Chain Management. Autom. Constr. 2013, 31, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Small, H. Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1973, 24, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C. The CiteSpace Manual; Drexel University: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014; Volume 103. [Google Scholar]
- Thinsungnoen, T.; Kaoungku, N.; Durongdumronchai, P.; Kerdprasop, K.; Kerdprasop, N. The Clustering Validity with Silhouette and Sum of Squared Errors. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial Application Engineering, Fukuoka, Japan, 28–31 March 2015; pp. 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lovmar, L.; Ahlford, A.; Jonsson, M.; Syvänen, A.C. Silhouette Scores for Assessment of SNP Genotype Clusters. BMC Genom. 2005, 6, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Rojas, M.; Marin, N.; Amparo Vila, M. The Role of Information Technologies to Address Data Handling in Construction Project Management. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2012, 30, 04015064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.C. Construction 3D BIM-Based Knowledge Management System: A Case Study. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2014, 20, 186–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Song, J.H.; Oh, K.S.; Gu, N. Information Lifecycle Management with RFID for Material Control on Construction Sites. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2013, 27, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadonikolaki, E. Loosely Coupled Systems of Innovation: Aligning BIM Adoption with Implementation in Dutch Construction. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 05018009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, X.; Xiong, F.; Olawumi, T.O.; Dong, N.; Chan, A.P.C. Conceptual Framework and Roadmap Approach for Integrating BIM into Lifecycle Project Management. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 05018011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhar, S. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 2011, 11, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, R.; Eastman, C.; Lee, G.; Teicholz, P. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, D.; Li, H.; Wang, G. Impacts of Isomorphic Pressures on BIM Adoption in Construction Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 04014056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chau, K.W.; Anson, M.; Zhang, J.P. 4D Dynamic Construction Management and Visualization Software: 1. Development. Autom. Constr. 2005, 14, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, Z.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, J. Application of 4D for Dynamic Site Layout and Management of Construction Projects. Autom. Constr. 2005, 14, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Shen, G.Q.; Wu, P.; Fan, H.; Wu, H.; Teng, Y. RBL-PHP: Simulation of Lean Construction and Information Technologies for Prefabrication Housing Production. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04017053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, W.; Yuan, H. A Framework for Understanding Waste Management Studies in Construction. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1252–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, J.; Hua, C.; Liu, C. Considerations for Better Construction and Demolition Waste Management: Identifying the Decision Behaviors of Contractors and Government Departments through a Game Theory Decision-Making Model. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikmehr, B.; Reza Hosseini, M.; Rameezdeen, R.; Chileshe, N.; Ghoddousi, P.; Arashpour, M. An Integrated Model for Factors Affecting Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Iran. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2017, 24, 1246–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Yu, A.T.W.; Poon, C.S. Promoting Effective Construction and Demolition Waste Management towards Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Hong Kong. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1713–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.Y.; Nguyen, M.V.; Luu, V.T. A Performance Evaluation Framework for Construction and Demolition Waste Management: Stakeholder Perspectives. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 3189–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zuo, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhong, X.; Li, J.; Pan, Y. Policy Instrument Choice for Construction and Demolition Waste Management: The Case Study of Shenzhen, China. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 1283–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, J.K.; Shen, G.Q.; Lindhard, S.M.; Brunoe, T.D. Factors Affecting Schedule Delay, Cost Overrun, and Quality Level in Public Construction Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2016, 32, 04015032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bogus, S.M.; Migliaccio, G.C.; Jin, R. Study of the Relationship between Procurement Duration and Project Performance in Design-Build Projects: Comparison between Water/Wastewater and Transportation Sectors. J. Manag. Eng. 2013, 29, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, D.R.; Shrestha, P.P.; Gibson, G.E.; Migliaccio, G.C. Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demirkesen, S.; Ozorhon, B. Measuring Project Management Performance: Case of Construction Industry. EMJ Eng. Manag. J. 2017, 29, 258–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Zhang, H.; Xia, B.; Wu, G.; Han, Y. Relationship between Internationalization and Financial Performance: Evidence from ENR-Listed Chinese Firms. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 04019044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anantatmula, V.S. Strategies for Enhancing Project Performance. J. Manag. Eng. 2015, 31, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ecem Yildiz, A.; Dikmen, I.; Talat Birgonul, M. Using System Dynamics for Strategic Performance Management in Construction. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 04019051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.W.; Han, S.H. Quantitative Analysis for Country Classification in the Construction Industry. J. Manag. Eng. 2017, 33, 04017014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.Y.; Xu, K.; Zuo, J.; Tang, C. Developing the International Construction Contracting Market: Enterprise Niche Approach. J. Manag. Eng. 2017, 33, 04016027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Hwang, B.-G.; Low, S.P. Investigating Enterprise Risk Management Maturity in Construction Firms. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 05014006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Hwang, B.G.; Low, S.P. An Enterprise Risk Management Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Construction Firms. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2016, 23, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doherty, N.; Smetters, K. Moral Hazard in Reinsurance Markets. J. Risk Insur. 2005, 72, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Breuer, M. Multiple Losses, Ex Ante Moral Hazard, and the Implications for Umbrella Policies. J. Risk Insur. 2005, 72, 525–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rockart, J.F.; Lecturer, S. ICRAM-1: Model for International Construction Risk Assessment. J. Manag. Eng. 2000, 16, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.T.; Chou, H.Y. Risk Allocation and Risk Handling of Highway Projects in Taiwan. J. Manag. Eng. 2003, 19, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, A.P.C.; Yeung, J.F.Y.; Yu, C.C.P.; Wang, S.Q.; Ke, Y. Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China. J. Manag. Eng. 2011, 27, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bing, L.; Akintoye, A.; Edwards, P.J.; Hardcastle, C. The Allocation of Risk in PPP/PFI Construction Projects in the UK. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2005, 23, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Akintoye, A.; Edwards, P.J.; Hardcastle, C. Perceptions of Positive and Negative Factors Influencing the Attractiveness of PPP/PFI Procurement for Construction Projects in the UK: Findings from a Questionnaire Survey. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2005, 12, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, J.B.H.; Chow, I.N.; Shavarebi, K. Criticality of Construction Industry Problems in Developing Countries: Analyzing Malaysian Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2019, 35, 04019020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunduz, M.; Nielsen, Y.; Ozdemir, M. Fuzzy Assessment Model to Estimate the Probability of Delay in Turkish Construction Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2015, 31, 04014055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khair, K.; Mohamed, Z.; Mohammad, R.; Farouk, H.; Ahmed, M.E. A Management Framework to Reduce Delays in Road Construction Projects in Sudan. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2018, 43, 1925–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olawumi, T.O.; Chan, D.W.M. Building Information Modelling and Project Information Management Framework for Construction Projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2018, 25, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chou, J.-S.; Irawan, N.; Pham, A.-D. Project Management Knowledge of Construction Professionals: Cross-Country Study of Effects on Project Success. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2013, 139, 04013015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comu, S.; Unsal, H.I.; Taylor, J.E. Dual Impact of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity on Project Network Performance. J. Manag. Eng. 2011, 27, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Marco, M.K.; Taylor, J.E.; Alin, P. Emergence and Role of Cultural Boundary Spanners in Global Engineering Project Networks. J. Manag. Eng. 2010, 26, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kale, S.; Karaman, E.A. A Fuzzy Logic Model for Benchmarking the Knowledge Management Performance of Construction Firms. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2011, 38, 464–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamad, M.R.; Mat Zin, N. Knowledge Management and the Competitiveness of Small Construction Firms: Innovation as Mediator. Compet. Rev. 2019, 29, 534–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, S.P.; Tserng, H.P.; Jan, S.H. Enhancing Knowledge Sharing Management Using BIM Technology in Construction. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 445–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ding, L.Y.; Zhong, B.T.; Wu, S.; Luo, H.B. Construction Risk Knowledge Management in BIM Using Ontology and Semantic Web Technology. Saf. Sci. 2016, 87, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, R.; Glückler, J.; Aubry, M.; Shao, J. Project Management Knowledge Flows in Networks of Project Managers and Project Management Offices: A Case Study in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Proj. Manag. J. 2013, 44, 4–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonardi, P.M.; Treem, J.W. Knowledge Management Technology as a Stage for Strategic Self-Presentation: Implications for Knowledge Sharing in Organizations. Inf. Organ. 2012, 22, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raudeliuniene, J.; Albats, E.; Kordab, M. Impact of Information Technologies and Social Networks on Knowledge Management Processes in Middle Eastern Audit and Consulting Companies. J. Knowl. Manag. 2020, 25, 871–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barros, M.V.; Ferreira, M.B.; do Prado, G.F.; Piekarski, C.M.; Picinin, C.T. The Interaction between Knowledge Management and Technology Transfer: A Current Literature Review between 2013 and 2018. J. Technol. Transf. 2020, 45, 1585–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flyvbjerg, B. What You Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview. Proj. Manag. J. 2014, 45, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zheng, X.; Lu, Y.; Le, Y.; Li, Y.; Fang, J. Formation of Interorganizational Relational Behavior in Megaprojects: Perspective of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04017052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahadorestani, A.; Karlsen, J.T.; Farimani, N.M. Novel Approach to Satisfying Stakeholders in Megaprojects: Balancing Mutual Values. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; He, Q.; Xia, B.; Meng, X.; Wu, P. Impact of Institutional Pressures on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: Evidence from Megaprojects. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04018028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castillo, T.; Alarcón, L.F.; Pellicer, E. Influence of Organizational Characteristics on Construction Project Performance Using Corporate Social Networks. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Valentin, V.; Naderpajouh, N.; Abraham, D.M. Integrating the Input of Stakeholders in Infrastructure Risk Assessment. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04018042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilke, J.P.; Taylor, J.E. Shifting Sands and Shifting Grounds: Analysis and Implications of Shifting Dynamics in the Global Construction Industry. J. Manag. Eng. 2015, 31, 04014076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jitwasinkul, B.; Hadikusumo, B.H.W.; Memon, A.Q. A Bayesian Belief Network Model of Organizational Factors for Improving Safe Work Behaviors in Thai Construction Industry. Saf. Sci. 2016, 82, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgatti, S.P.; Foster, P.C. The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. J. Manag. 2003, 29, 991–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.; Shen, L. Embedding “Green” in Project-Based Organizations: The Way Ahead in the Construction Industry? J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yin, Y.; Browne, G.J.; Li, D. Adoption of Building Information Modeling in Chinese Construction Industry: The Technology-Organization-Environment Framework. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 26, 1878–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malin, J.T.; Lance, N. Processes in Construction of Failure Management Expert Systems from Device Design Information. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1987, 17, 956–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suman, N.; Ursic, D.; Psunder, M.; Veselinovic, D. Mobile Information and Communication Technology and Management of Business Changes in Construction Companies in Slovenia. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 2009, 22, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.C. Enhancing Construction Quality Inspection and Management Using RFID Technology. Autom. Constr. 2008, 17, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galan, B.; Dosal, E.; Andrés, A.; Viguri, J. Optimisation of the Construction and Demolition Waste Management Facilities Location in Cantabria (Spain) under Economical and Environmental Criteria. Waste Biomass Valorization 2013, 4, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasović, B.; Galić, M.; Klanšek, U. A Survey on Integration of Optimization and Project Management Tools for Sustainable Construction Scheduling. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, J.; Xu, W.; Xia, B.; Skibniewski, M.J. Exploring Key Indicators of Residual Value Risks in China’s Public-Private Partnership Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04017046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comello, S.D.; Lepech, M.D.; Schwegler, B.R. Project-Level Assessment of Environmental Impact: Ecosystem Services Approach to Sustainable Management and Development. J. Manag. Eng. 2012, 28, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Song, Z. Review of Studies on the Resilience of Urban Critical Infrastructure Networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2020, 193, 106617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Sui, Y.; Ma, H.; Wang, L.; Zeng, S. CEO Narcissism, Public Concern, and Megaproject Social Responsibility: Moderated Mediating Examination. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04018018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanzadeh, S.; Esmaeili, B.; Dodd, M.D. Measuring the Impacts of Safety Knowledge on Construction Workers’ Attentional Allocation and Hazard Detection Using Remote Eye-Tracking Technology. J. Manag. Eng. 2017, 33, 04019016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barco, A.L. Budgeting for Facility Repair and Maintenance. J. Manag. Eng. 1994, 10, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antillon, E.I.; Garvin, M.J.; Molenaar, K.R.; Javernick-Will, A. Influence of Interorganizational Coordination on Lifecycle Design Decision Making: Comparative Case Study of Public-Private Partnership Highway Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 05018007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, A.H.; Soomro, M.A.; Lakho, N.A.; Bhutto, M.A.; Memon, A.N. A Survey on the Criteria for Measuring the Profitability of a Construction Organization. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2018, 8, 2879–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karji, A.; Bernstein, S.; Tafazzoli, M.; Taghinezhad, A.; Mohammadi, A. Evaluation of an Interview-Based Internship Class in the Construction Management Curriculum: A Case Study of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, J.; Zhao, X.; Nguyen, Q.B.M.; Ma, T.; Gao, S. Soft Skills of Construction Project Management Professionals and Project Success Factors: A Structural Equation Model. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2018, 25, 425–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kar, S.; Jha, K.N. Examining the Effect of Material Management Issues on the Schedule and Cost Performance of Construction Projects Based on a Structural Equation Model: Survey of Indian Experiences. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 05020011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yiu, N.S.N.; Chan, D.W.M.; Sze, N.N.; Shan, M.; Chan, A.P.C. Implementation of Safety Management System for Improving Construction Safety Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Buildings 2019, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.; Yuan, H. System Dynamics Approach for Investigating the Risk Effects on Schedule Delay in Infrastructure Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2017, 33, 04016029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Cui, Z.; Feng, Y.; Perera, S.; Han, J. Impact of Culture Differences on Performance of International Construction Joint Ventures: The Moderating Role of Conflict Management. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 2353–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasir, M.K.; Hadikusumo, B.H.W. System Dynamics Model of Contractual Relationships between Owner and Contractor in Construction Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2019, 35, 04018052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Li, N.; Jiang, Z.; Fang, D.; Anumba, C.J. An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Understanding the Effect of Worker-Management Interactions on Construction Workers’ Safety-Related Behaviors. Autom. Constr. 2019, 97, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, V.J.L.; Cheng, J.C.P. Formulation and Analysis of Dynamic Supply Chain of Backfill in Construction Waste Management Using Agent-Based Modeling. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2015, 29, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, C.; Kim, K.J.; Maglio, P.P. Smart Cities with Big Data: Reference Models, Challenges, and Considerations. Cities 2018, 82, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oettinghaus, S. Digital Construction with Building Information Modeling—The Digital Twin. Wasserwirtschaft 2019, 109, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schimanski, C.P.; Monizza, G.P.; Marcher, C.; Matt, D.T. Pushing Digital Automation of Configure-to-Order Services in Small and Medium Enterprises of the Construction Equipment Industry: A Design Science Research Approach. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goel, A.; Ganesh, L.S.; Kaur, A. Sustainability Integration in the Management of Construction Projects: A Morphological Analysis of over Two Decades’ Research Literature. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hewa Welege, N.M.; Pan, W.; Kumaraswamy, M. Social Network Analysis Applications in Sustainable Construction and Built Environment Management: A Review. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2021. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, S.; Kim, K.; Kim, K.; Jeong, H.; Kim, H. Reliability Approach in Economic Assessment of Adapting Infrastructure to Climate Change. J. Manag. Eng. 2017, 33, 04017022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Naderpajouh, N.; Yu, D.J.; Hastak, M. Capacity Building for an Infrastructure System in Case of Disaster Using the System’s Associated Social and Technical Components. J. Manag. Eng. 2019, 35, 04019013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J. Risk Identification and Responses of Tunnel Construction Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 6620539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, T.; Wei, G.; Lin, R.; Lu, J.; Wei, C.; Wu, J. Pythagorean Interval 2-Tuple Linguistic Vikor Method for Evaluating Human Factors in Construction Project Management. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 17, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smuttrasen, K.; Heo, D. The Impact of Leader Roles on Cross-Border Knowledge Management and the Development of Boundaryless Business Models: A Case Study of Thai Construction Companies. Knowl. Process Manag. 2020, 27, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Duan, P.; Su, J. The Effectiveness of Project Management Construction with Data Mining and Blockchain Consensus. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Main Data | Period 1 (2000–2009) | Period 2 (2010–2020) | Total (2000–2020) |
---|---|---|---|
Documents | 276 | 912 | 1188 |
Sources | 125 | 304 | 386 |
Keywords plus (ID) | 242 | 1499 | 1613 |
Author’s Keywords (DE) | 629 | 2953 | 3370 |
Average citations per document | 33.33 | 18.02 | 21.58 |
Authors | 621 | 2200 | 2716 |
Documents per Author | 0.444 | 0.415 | 0.437 |
Authors per Document | 2.25 | 2.41 | 2.29 |
Co-authors per document | 2.67 | 3.18 | 3.06 |
Collaboration index | 2.52 | 2.6 | 2.48 |
No. | Period 1 | P | Period 2 | P | Total period | P | H | TC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Automation in Construction | 37 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | 64 | Automation in Construction | 91 | 40 | 4053 |
2 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | 24 | Automation in Construction | 54 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | 88 | 26 | 2069 |
3 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-ASCE | 24 | Journal of Management in Engineering | 46 | Journal of Management in Engineering | 59 | 23 | 1557 |
4 | Journal of Management in Engineering | 13 | Sustainability | 36 | Sustainability | 36 | 8 | 185 |
5 | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | 8 | Engineering Construction and Architectural Management | 32 | Engineering Construction and Architectural Management | 32 | 11 | 248 |
6 | Building and Environment | 6 | Journal of Civil Engineering and Management | 29 | Journal of Civil Engineering and Management | 32 | 14 | 588 |
7 | Waste Management | 6 | Journal of Cleaner production | 29 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-ASCE | 32 | 20 | 1154 |
8 | Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering | 5 | International Journal of Project Management | 24 | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | 31 | 11 | 348 |
9 | Resources Conservation and Recycling | 5 | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | 23 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 29 | 18 | 973 |
10 | Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering | 4 | KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering | 17 | International Journal of Project Management | 26 | 20 | 1506 |
No. | Titles | Year | Source | Citations | CY | Research Data Used for Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China | 2004 | Safety Science | 280 | 15.56 | Qualitative data from literatures and questionnaires |
2 | The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation | 2002 | Management Leaning | 266 | 13.30 | Qualitative and quantitative data from case investigation |
3 | Greening project management practices for sustainable construction | 2011 | Journal of Management in Engineering | 220 | 20.00 | Qualitative data from literatures |
4 | The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction | 2012 | International Journal of Project Management | 193 | 19.30 | Qualitative and quantitative data from questionnaires |
5 | Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions | 2015 | International Journal of Project Management | 186 | 26.57 | Qualitative data from literatures |
6 | Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice | 2010 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 181 | 15.08 | Quantitative data from reports |
7 | Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges | 2013 | International Journal of Project Management | 170 | 18.89 | Qualitative and quantitative data from literatures and interviews |
8 | A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system | 2001 | Advances in Engineering Software | 162 | 7.71 | Quantitative data from case investigations |
9 | Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction | 2003 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | 161 | 8.47 | Quantitative and qualitative data from literatures and questionnaires |
10 | Integrating BIM and GIS to improve the visual monitoring of construction supply chain management | 2013 | Automation in Construction | 157 | 17.44 | Quantitative data from case investigations |
# | Size | Silhouette Value | Mean Year | Label (LLR) | Research Themes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 90 | 0.921 | 2009 | Construction project management | Modern technology |
1 | 70 | 0.939 | 2009 | Construction waste management | Waste management |
2 | 54 | 0.944 | 2004 | Exploring critical success factor | Performance management |
3 | 44 | 0.922 | 2015 | Demolition waste management | Waste management |
4 | 40 | 0.954 | 2010 | Enterprise risk management | Risk management |
5 | 40 | 0.907 | 2014 | Civil engineering | Project management |
6 | 40 | 0.949 | 2013 | Critical success factor | Performance management |
7 | 32 | 0.927 | 2007 | Knowledge management practice | Knowledge management |
8 | 30 | 0.974 | 2016 | Multicriteria decision-making | Performance management |
9 | 25 | 0.964 | 2003 | Risk management | Risk management |
10 | 21 | 0.907 | 2012 | Green supply chain management | Performance management |
11 | 16 | 0.988 | 2001 | Visualization software | Modern technology |
16 | 13 | 0.938 | 2005 | Construction Environment | Risk management |
19 | 9 | 0.997 | 2002 | Chinese construction firm | Organization management |
23 | 7 | 0.998 | 2007 | Construction professional | Project management |
Period 1 (2000–2009) | Period 2 (2010–2020) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | F | DE | F | ID | F | DE | F |
system | 10 | construction | 24 | performance | 133 | construction | 103 |
model | 9 | construction management | 24 | model | 102 | management | 85 |
design | 7 | construction industry | 20 | system | 85 | construction management | 74 |
performance | 6 | management | 15 | design | 65 | project management | 58 |
industry | 5 | project management | 11 | impact | 52 | construction industry | 53 |
systems | 5 | knowledge management | 10 | projects | 51 | construction and demolition waste | 44 |
impact | 4 | information management | 7 | framework | 49 | risk management | 41 |
quality | 4 | information technology | 6 | industry | 48 | waste management | 29 |
behavior | 3 | performance | 5 | systems | 47 | project | 26 |
health | 3 | safety | 5 | behavior | 26 | sustainability | 21 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, S.; Li, D.; Zhu, J.; Feng, H. Towards a Data-Rich Era: A Bibliometric Analysis of Construction Management from 2000 to 2020. Buildings 2022, 12, 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122242
Zhu S, Li D, Zhu J, Feng H. Towards a Data-Rich Era: A Bibliometric Analysis of Construction Management from 2000 to 2020. Buildings. 2022; 12(12):2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122242
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Shiyao, Dezhi Li, Jin Zhu, and Haibo Feng. 2022. "Towards a Data-Rich Era: A Bibliometric Analysis of Construction Management from 2000 to 2020" Buildings 12, no. 12: 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122242