Correction: Payo et al. Geometrical Analysis of the Inland Topography to Assess the Likely Response of Wave-Dominated Coastline to Sea Level: Application to Great Britain. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 866

Payo, Andres; Williams, Chris; Vernon, Rowan; Hulbert, Andrew G.; Lee, Kathryn A.; Lee, Jonathan R.

doi:10.3390/jmse10070913

Open AccessCorrection

Correction: Payo et al. Geometrical Analysis of the Inland Topography to Assess the Likely Response of Wave-Dominated Coastline to Sea Level: Application to Great Britain. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 866

British Geological Survey, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(7), 913; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070913

Submission received: 28 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 1 July 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Representation of the Coastal Topo-Bathymetry and Subsurface for Flooding and Erosion Risk Reduction)

Download Versions Notes

Text Correction

There was an error in the original publication. The same typographical error described here is found in the Abstract, Discussion, Section 4.2, and Conclusions. The sentence states “The remaining 39%…”, which should be “The remaining 29%…”. As described in Section 4.1 and Figures 10 and 11, cliff clusters 2 (4%), 3 (2%), 4 (4%), 6 (3%), 7 (6%), 9 (4%) and 10 (5%) correspond with cliff type (29% with decimals) and clusters 1 (15%), 5 (8%) and 8 (48%) are non-cliff profiles (71%). Both combined (cliff and non-cliff) add up to 100%.

A correction has also been made to the Abstract, the first paragraph of Section 4.2, and the first paragraph of the Conclusions:

The remaining 29% is best described as cliff-type coastline

The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Payo, A.; Williams, C.; Vernon, R.; Hulbert, A.G.; Lee, K.A.; Lee, J.R. Correction: Payo et al. Geometrical Analysis of the Inland Topography to Assess the Likely Response of Wave-Dominated Coastline to Sea Level: Application to Great Britain. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 866. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070913

AMA Style

Payo A, Williams C, Vernon R, Hulbert AG, Lee KA, Lee JR. Correction: Payo et al. Geometrical Analysis of the Inland Topography to Assess the Likely Response of Wave-Dominated Coastline to Sea Level: Application to Great Britain. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 866. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(7):913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070913

Chicago/Turabian Style

Payo, Andres, Chris Williams, Rowan Vernon, Andrew G. Hulbert, Kathryn A. Lee, and Jonathan R. Lee. 2022. "Correction: Payo et al. Geometrical Analysis of the Inland Topography to Assess the Likely Response of Wave-Dominated Coastline to Sea Level: Application to Great Britain. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 866" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 7: 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070913

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Correction: Payo et al. Geometrical Analysis of the Inland Topography to Assess the Likely Response of Wave-Dominated Coastline to Sea Level: Application to Great Britain. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 866

Text Correction

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI