Resumen
What happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon?s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of an appeal to a ?new humanism??), but in the sense that Fanonism itself, as such, would be a discourse and reading of invention? In this essay I compare Fanon?s reading of invention with that of C.L.R. James?s reading of spontaneity in Notes on Dialectics.