Compliance Level Analysis of Announcement of General Procurement Plan in Indonesia
(1) UIN Sunan Kalijaga
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the Compliance Level of the Public Procurement Plan Announcement in Indonesia. The observation period for this study was carried out for three years and for all Ministry / Agencies / Regional Government. The test was conducted to determine the effect of Value of Procurement, Way of Implementation, Type of Procurement, and Provider Selection Method on the level of compliance in announcing the General Procurement Plan. The level of compliance with the announcement of the General Procurement Plan was mostly influenced by the value of the procurement contract. It was also found that the number of procurement packages in a self-managed manner had a significant negative effect on the level of compliance. In the type of procurement, it was found that the value of the procurement packages had a greater influence on the number of packages. It was also found that the value of the consultant procurement package had a negative effect on the compliance level of the General Procurement Plan announcement. In the provider selection method, it was found that the value of the procurement packages had a greater influence on the number of procurement packages. In general, it is found that the variable value of the procurement packages significantly affects the level of compliance more than the number of procurement packages. The results of this research indicate the need for greater attention to the involvement of Small and medium enterprises and domestic production content in procurement. This is the first research effort to understand the success of the general procurement plan in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asliana, E., 2012. The procurement of government goods and services in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah ESAI, 6(1), pp.16-31.
Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R. and Griffin, M., 1994. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 20(4), pp.644-656.
Basheka, B.C., 2009. Procurement planning and local governance in Uganda: A factor analysis approach. International journal of procurement management, 2(2), pp.191-209.
Boateng, W., 2012. Evaluating the efficacy of focus group discussion (FGD) in qualitative social research. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), pp.54-57.
Coccia, M. and Igor, B., 2018. Rewards in public administration: a proposed classification. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 5(2), pp.68-80.
Etzioni, A. (1997). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Faisal, N.I., Morasa, J. and Mawikere, L.M., 2017. Analisis Sistem Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (Penunjung Langsung) pada di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kota Manado. GOING CONCERN: JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI, 12(2).
Gelderman, C.J., Paul, W.T. and Brugman, M.J., 2006. Public procurement and EU tendering directives–explaining non‐compliance. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Hidayat, A., 2019. Evaluasi Perencanaan Umum Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah pada Universitas Brawijaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 5(1), pp.97-105.
Hidayah, A.W. and Alit, R., 2020. Pengukuran Kualitas Sistem Informasi Rencana Umum Pengadaan (Sirup) Menggunakan Iso 9126 (Studi Kasus: Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Sidoarjo). Jurnal Informatika dan Sistem Informasi (JIFoSI), 1(2), pp.450-457.
Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., Gangl, K., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M. and Kirchler, E., 2017. Authorities' coercive and legitimate power: the impact on cognitions underlying cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, p.5.
Hui, W.S., Othman, R., Omar, N.H., Rahman, R.A. and Haron, N.H., 2011. Procurement issues in Malaysia. International journal of public sector Management.
Keputusan Deputi Bidang Monitoring-Evaluasi Dan Pengembangan Sistem Informasi, Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Nomor 10 Tahun 2019 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perencanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah
Lunenburg, F.C., 2012. Compliance theory and organizational effectiveness. International journal of scholarly academic intellectual diversity, 14(1), pp.1-4.
Majampoh, E.L.J., Saerang, D.P. and Afandi, D., 2018. Analisis Sistem dan Prosedur Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Komisi Pemilihan Umum Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. GOING CONCERN: JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI, 13(04).
Montoro‐Sánchez, Á., Soriano, D.R., Zhou, Y. and Zhang, Y., 2011. Utilitarianism or romanticism: the effect of rewards on employees' innovative behaviour. International Journal of Manpower.
Panayiotou, N.A., Gayialis, S.P. and Tatsiopoulos, I.P., 2004. An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing. International journal of production economics, 90(1), pp.79-102.
Primanda, P.P. and Harahap, S.N., 2019, July. Analysis of Internal Control of Procurement of Government (Case Study on at XYZ University). In Asia Pacific Business and Economics Conference (APBEC 2018) (pp. 87-93). Atlantis Press.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Ratnaningsih, (2010). Pengadaan Bahan Pustaka Di Perguruan Tinggi : Suatu Pengalaman Di Perpustakaan Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia Volume 10 No. 1 pp 45-50.
Sawidar, S., Muttaqin, M. and Rauzana, A., 2018. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penerapan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Secara E-Procurement Terhadap Penyerapan Anggaran Di Kota Sabang. Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil dan Perencanaan, 1(1), pp.151-160.
Zhou, Yu & Zhang, Yingying & Montoro-Sanchez, Angeles. (2011). Utilitarianism or romanticism: The effect of rewards on employees' innovative behaviour. International Journal of Manpower. 32. 81-98. 10.1108/01437721111121242.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v6i2.439
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 311 timesPDF - 148 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Integrated Journal of Business and Economics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
