Post-harvest quality of Campomanesia adamantium (Cambess.) O. Berg. in function of storage temperature

Keywords: gabiroba, refrigeration, breath, cerrado, maturity stage, post-harvest conditions.

Abstract

Brazil has a large variety of native and exotic fruit species, including the gabiroba, which can be sources of income for the population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the post-harvest behavior of gabiroba fruit by maturity stage and storage temperature. The fruits were divided into two lots and stored at temperatures of 6, 12, 24 and 30°C. The first batch was used for the physical and chemical analysis of acidity, soluble solids, firmness, percentage of green color, and visual analysis; this batch was composed of green and yellow-green fruit. The second lot was intended for breath analysis, composed of green, yellow-green, and yellow fruits. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with five replications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Considering the evaluated characteristics, the gabiroba soluble solid/titratable acidity ratio values should be approximately 4.0 for the fruits to be considered acceptable for consumption. For the preservation of the post-harvest quality of gabiroba, it is indicated that the harvest is carried out at the green stage of maturation and that they are stored at a temperature of 6°C. The highest respiratory rates were observed in fruits harvested at the yellow stage, not being recommended its storage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-08-20
How to Cite
Santos, M. A. do, Costa, A. C., Megguer, C. A., Lima, J. da S., Carvalho, Y. G. S., Rezende-Silva, S. L., & Batista, P. F. (2020). Post-harvest quality of Campomanesia adamantium (Cambess.) O. Berg. in function of storage temperature. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 43(1), e48979. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.48979
Section
Science, Food Technology and Food Engineering

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus