A numerical study of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performances affected by various porosities of gas difussion layer materials

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.181442

Keywords:

numerical study, PEMFC, performance, porosity, gas diffusion layer, material, COMSOL Multiphysics.

Abstract

One of the factors that can increase the surface transfer property for gas diffusivity apart from the membrane material in PEMFC is the porosity of the gas diffusion layer material affecting species mass distribution at the electrodes. The present study simulates the performance of PEMFC by investigating the effect of GDL porosities in some commercial ELAT-TEK-1200W (e=0.31), and SIGRACET 25BA (e=0.63), also an organic material coconut coir (e=0.88) numerically. It was carried out using COMSOL Multiphysics 5.3a in the form of species mass concentrations plotted in the surface contour and cut points at the electrodes in the elapsed time transiently. Afterward, the results were used to determine the PEMFC performance by calculating some losses; activation, ohmic, and mass concentration polarization. The results showed that the PEMFC performance was only influenced by the mass polarization. It means that the power density is strongly influenced by the concentration of species in the anode and the cathode. The mass concentration is strongly influenced by the distribution of species; H2, O2, and H2O formed during the reaction. The highest H2 concentration at the anode occurs in the GDL using ELAT-TEK-1200W having the smallest porosity producing the highest power density compared to other GDL materials. It makes an easier diffusion process between H2 and O2 species to work properly. However, coconut coir as an organic material can be a promising GDL in the future because of its performance compared to the others.

Author Biographies

Widya Wijayanti, Brawijaya University Jl. Mayjen Haryono, 167, Malang, Indonesia, 65145

Associate Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Rizky Kusumastuti, National Central University No. 300, Zhongda Road, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, 320

Master student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Sasmoko Sasmoko, National Central University No. 300, Zhongda Road, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, 320

PhD student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Mega Nur Sasongko, Brawijaya University Jl. Mayjen Haryono, 167, Malang, Indonesia, 65145

Associate Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Wang, Y., Chen, K. S., Mishler, J., Cho, S. C., Adroher, X. C. (2011). A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Applied Energy, 88 (4), 981–1007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030
  2. Qiu, D., Janßen, H., Peng, L., Irmscher, P., Lai, X., Lehnert, W. (2018). Electrical resistance and microstructure of typical gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cell under compression. Applied Energy, 231, 127–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.117
  3. Mohammed, H., Al-Othman, A., Nancarrow, P., Tawalbeh, M., El Haj Assad, M. (2019). Direct hydrocarbon fuel cells: A promising technology for improving energy efficiency. Energy, 172, 207–219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.105
  4. Fadzillah, D. M., Rosli, M. I., Talib, M. Z. M., Kamarudin, S. K., Daud, W. R. W. (2017). Review on microstructure modelling of a gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 1001–1009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.235
  5. Tseng, C.-J., Lo, S.-K. (2010). Effects of microstructure characteristics of gas diffusion layer and microporous layer on the performance of PEMFC. Energy Conversion and Management, 51 (4), 677–684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.011
  6. Park, S., Popov, B. N. (2011). Effect of a GDL based on carbon paper or carbon cloth on PEM fuel cell performance. Fuel, 90 (1), 436–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.003
  7. O’Hayre, R., Cha, S.-W., Colella, W., Prinz, F. B. (2016). Fuel Cell Fundamentals. John Wiley & Sons. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119191766
  8. Bruno, M. M., Viva, F. A. (2013). Carbon Materials for Fuel Cells. Direct Alcohol Fuel Cells, 231–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7708-8_7
  9. Destyorini, F., Irmawati, Y., Widodo, H., Khaerudini, D. S., Indayaningsih, N. (2018). Properties and Performance of Gas Diffusion Layer PEMFC Derived from Coconut Coir. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 50 (3), 409–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.3.7
  10. Indayaningsih, N., Irmawati, Y., Destyorini, F. (2016). Performance of gas diffusion layer derived from carbon powder of coconut coir for PEMFC application. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11 (6), 4040–4044.
  11. Jeon, D. H., Kim, K. N., Baek, S. M., Nam, J. H. (2011). The effect of relative humidity of the cathode on the performance and the uniformity of PEM fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (19), 12499–12511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.136
  12. El-kharouf, A., Mason, T. J., Brett, D. J. L., Pollet, B. G. (2012). Ex-situ characterisation of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 218, 393–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.099
  13. Chen, F., Chang, M., Hsieh, P. (2008). Two-phase transport in the cathode gas diffusion layer of PEM fuel cell with a gradient in porosity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33 (10), 2525–2529. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.077
  14. Hinebaugh, J., Bazylak, A. (2011). PEM Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layer Modelling of Pore Structure and Predicted Liquid Water Saturation. ASME 2011 9th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/fuelcell2011-54422
  15. Sezgin, B., Caglayan, D. G., Devrim, Y., Steenberg, T., Eroglu, I. (2016). Modeling and sensitivity analysis of high temperature PEM fuel cells by using Comsol Multiphysics. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41 (23), 10001–10009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.142
  16. Kalinci, Y., Dincer, I. (2018). Analysis and performance assessment of NH3 and H2 fed SOFC with proton-conducting electrolyte. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43 (11), 5795–5807. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.234
  17. Jeon, D. H., Kim, K. N., Baek, S. M., Nam, J. H. (2011). The effect of relative humidity of the cathode on the performance and the uniformity of PEM fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (19), 12499–12511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.136
  18. Ji, M., Wei, Z. (2009). A Review of Water Management in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. Energies, 2 (4), 1057–1106. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en20401057

Downloads

Published

2020-02-29

How to Cite

Wijayanti, W., Kusumastuti, R., Sasmoko, S., & Sasongko, M. N. (2020). A numerical study of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performances affected by various porosities of gas difussion layer materials. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(5 (103), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.181442

Issue

Section

Applied physics