Synthetic polyelectrolytes in the clarification of stevia aqueous extract
Abstract
The extract of stevia leaves is usually dark which demands a clarification in order to be accepted by sweetener consumers. One of the using techniques is the decantation, which requires the use of effective products for best results. In the market, flocculant products are available, such as: NOVUSTM CE2666 (cationic) and BETZDEARBORNTMF11 (anionic). When these products are used at a certain level of concentration, satisfactory results of decantation and consequent clarification are provided. The aim of this paper was to compare the performance of the best polymers by removal percentage (color and turbidity) and by the decantation speed. A Jar Test device was used and the concentration of coagulant (aluminum sulfate) and of polyelectrolytes were varied, as well as pH at 8,0, 9,0 and 10,0. Calcium oxide was applied in this phase. The best condition was obtained when the anionic polyelectrolyte was used, reaching a turbidity removal of 97%.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-22
How to Cite
Bunhak, Élcio J., Mendes, E. S., Pereira, N. C., & Costa, S. C. (2008). Synthetic polyelectrolytes in the clarification of stevia aqueous extract. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 24, 1643-1648. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v24i0.2487
Issue
Section
Chemical Engineering
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 3.0 properly.
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by