Selection of categorical variables using correspondence and <em>procrustes</em> analysis

  • Terezinha Aparecida Guedes COCAMAR
  • Ivan Ludgero Ivanqui UEM
  • Ana Beatriz Tozzo Martins UEM
  • Etelvina Barretos Rodrigues Cochia UEM

Abstract

Correspondence analysis is a technique of multivaried analysis (particularly, a method of factorial analysis to categorical variables) that allows us to obtain a graphic representation through the distribution of the scores from the categories of lines and/or columns in a system of coordinates. Krzanowski (1987) presented a methodology that combines the analysis of principal components with procrustes analysis to determine how much the new subset of variables represents the structure of the original data. The aim of this study is to propose a procedure that applies to the procrustes analysis combined with the correspondence analysis to find a rank of importance to the columns (variables) of a contingency table. That procedure has been applied according to an example by Krzanowski (1993). Some conclusions are presented about the behavior of the procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Terezinha Aparecida Guedes, COCAMAR
Possui graduação em Matemática pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá (1981), mestrado em Estatística pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (1985) e doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1996). Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Tem experiência na área de Probabilidade e Estatística, com ênfase em Planejamento de Experimentos, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: análise de variância, teste de tukey, análise de correspondência, análise procrustes e análise de correlação Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-05-14
How to Cite
Guedes, T. A., Ivanqui, I. L., Martins, A. B. T., & Cochia, E. B. R. (2008). Selection of categorical variables using correspondence and <em>procrustes</em&gt; analysis. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 21, 861-868. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v21i0.3084
Section
Statistics

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus