Email the author 
Tingkat Suku Bunga Pembiayaan Usaha Mikro Dan Ukm Terhadap Tingkat Pertumbuhan Perekonomian Indonesia
(1) Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Pertumbuhan ekonomi merupakan perkembangan kegiatan dalam perekonomian yang menyebabkan barang dan jasa yang diproduksi dalam masyarakat bertambah dan mengakibatkan terjadinya peningkatan kemakmuran masyarakat. Tingkat bunga menentukan investasi yang akan memberi keuntungan kepada para pengusaha. Semakin rendah tingkat bunga semakin banyak investasi yang dilakukan para pengusaha. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kausalitas yaitu penelitian yang ingin mencari penjelasan dalam bentuk hubungan sebab akibat (cause-effect) antar beberapa konsep atau beberapa variable independent yakni meliputi Suku Bunga Pembiayaan Usaha Mikro Dan UKM dan Produktivitas Usaha dan Tenaga Kerja, serta variable dependent yaitu Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Dalam penelitian ini analisis data menggunakan pendekatan Regresi Data Panel menggunakan Software Eviews. Tujuan penggunaan sofware Evies adalah membantu peneliti untuk tujuan prediksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Suku Bunga Pembiayaan Usaha Mikro Dan UKM berpengaruh signifikan terhadap terhadap Tingkat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dengan nilai t-statistic sebesar 0,027612 (< 0,05) sedangkan Produktivitas Usaha dan Tenaga Kerja juga berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Tingkat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dengan nilai t-statistic sebesar 0,011741 (< 0,05).
Kata kunci : Suku Bunga, Produktivitas Usaha, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adiningsih, Sri, 2003. The Indonesia Business Rop in AFTA, Indonesia Business Perspective, Volume V, No. 3, PT. Harvest International Indonesia, March
Bhalla, A. S. (2017), Can high technology help Third World take-off? Economic and Political Weekly, Volume 22, No. 27, pp. 1082-1086.
Cravo, T. A. (2016), SMEs and economic growth in the Brazilian micro-regions. Papers in Regional Science, Volume 89, No. 4, pp. 711-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00301.x
Fagerberg, J., M. Srholec and B. Verspagen (2011), Innovation and Economic Development. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, North Holland. Freel, M. S. (2000), Do small innovating firms outperform non-innovators? Small Business Economics, Volume 14(3), pp. 195-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008100206266
Gault, F. (2010), Innovation Strategies for a Global Economy. International Development Research Council (IDRC), Canada. Government of Pakistan (1990 to 2013), Pakistan Economic Survey. Islamabad: Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.
Government of Pakistan (2009), Statistical Yearbook. Islamabad: Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan. Government of Pakistan, Fifty Years of Pakistan in Statistics (1947-97), Volume (1, 2, 3). Islamabad: Federal Bureau of Statistics.
Hall, B. H., F. Lotti and J. Mairesse (2009), Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, Volume 33(1), pp. 13-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
Jeppesen, S. (2015), Enhancing competitiveness and securing equitable development: Can small, micro, and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) do the trick? Development in Practice, Volume 15 (3&4), pp. 463-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614520500076100
Khan, Iqbal M. (2014), Unlocking the Potential of Small Enterprises for Economic Development, Innovative Development Strategies. SURE Business Directories & Guide Publisher, Lahore, Pakistan. SUBHAN et al.: Innovation and Economic Development 173
Kharbanda, V. P. (2011), Facilitating innovation in Indian small and medium enterprises: The role of clusters. Current Science, Volume 80(3), pp. 343-348
Lefebvre, E. and L. A. Lefebvre (2001), Innovative capabilities as determinants of export performance and behavior: a longitudinal study of manufacturing SMEs. In A. Kleinknecht and P. Mohnen (eds.), Innovation and Firm Performance: Econometric Explorations of Survey Data. London: MacMillan and Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Motohashi, K. (2011), Use of plant level micro-data for SME innovation policy evaluation in Japan. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan and Research Institute of Economy Trade and Industry (RIETI), Japan, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 01-E-006.
Ohashi, H. (2017), How to measure the outcome of innovation: Application to product innovation? Conference Paper; Towards Global Innovation Ecosystem beyond National Innovation. Piëst, B. (1994), Planning comprehensiveness and strategy in SME’s. Small Business Economics, Volume 6(5), pp. 387-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01065142
SBP (1990 to 2013), State Bank Reports. Karachi: State Bank of Pakistan. Seguino, S. (2000), The effects of structural change and economic liberalization on gender wage differential in South Korea and Taiwan. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 24(4), pp. 437-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/24.4.437
Soriano, D. R. and S. R. Dobon (2011), Linking globalization of entrepreneurship in small organizations. Small Business Economics, Volume 32(3), pp. 233-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9155-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36587/probank.v3i2.383
Article Metrics
Abstract views: 290
| 
PDF views: 567
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
| © ProBank: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan | View Probank Stats |