Investment Modelling Using Value at Risk Bayesian Mixture Modelling Approach and Backtesting to Assess Stock Risk
Downloads
Background: Stock investment has been gaining momentum in the past years due to the development of technology. During the pandemic lockdown, people have invested more. One the one hand, stock investment has high potential profitability, but on the other, it is equally risky. Therefore, a value at risk (VaR) analysis is needed. One approach to calculate VaR is by using the Bayesian mixture model, which has been proven to be able to overcome heavy-tailed cases. Then, the VaR’s accuracy needs to be tested, and one of the ways is by using backtesting, such as the Kupiec test.
Objective: This study aims to determine the VaR model of PT NFC Indonesia Tbk (NFCX) return data using Bayesian mixture modelling and backtesting. On a practical level, this study can provide information about the potential risks of investing that is grounded in empirical evidence.
Methods: The data used was NFCX data retrieved from Yahoo Finance, which was then modelled with a mixture model based on the normal and Laplace distributions. After that, the VaR accuracy was calculated and then tested by using backtesting.
Results: The test results showed that the VaR with the mixture Laplace autoregressive (MLAR) approach (2;[2],[4]) was accurate at 5% and 1% quantiles while mixture normal autoregressive MNAR (2;[2],[2,4]) was only accurate at 5% quantiles.
Conclusion: The better performing NFCX VaR model for this study based on backtesting using Kupiec test is MLAR(2;[2],[4]).
C. C. Widjaja and A. Sim, COVID-19’s Impact on Indonesian Consumers Accelerating shifts in consumer behaviour, Asian Insights Office • DBS Group Research, 2020.
B. Miftahurrohmah, Y. S. Dharmawan and C. Wulandari, “Bayesian Mixture Laplace Autoregressive Modeling To Estimate Value-At-Risk In E-Commerce Stocks”.
K. C. Cheung and F. L. Yuen, “On the uncertainty of VaR of individual risk,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 367, 2020.
S.-Y. Choi and J.-H. Yoon, “Modeling and Risk Analysis Using Parametric Distributions with an Application in Equity-Linked Securities,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, no. Special Issue, pp. 1-20, 2020.
C. Chen, “Tests of fit for the asymmetric Laplace distribution,” Statistics and Interface, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 405-414, 2014.
P. Abad, S. Benito and C. López, “A comprehensive review of Value at Risk methodologies,” The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 15-32, 2013.
Q. Li, M. Guindani, B. J. Reich, H. D. Bondell and M. Vannucci, “A Bayesian mixture model for clustering and selection of feature occurrence rates under mean constraints,” Statistical Data and Data Mining, The ASA Data Science Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 393-409, 2017.
F. Noor, A. Sajid, S. B. H. Shah, M. Zaman, M. Gheisari and V. Mariappan, “Bayesian estimation and prediction for Burr‐Rayleigh mixture model using censored data,” International Journal of Communication System, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 1-13, 2019.
M. Huang, W. Yao, S. Wang and Y. Chen, “Statistical Inference and Applications of Mixture of Varying Coefficient Models,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 618-643, 2018.
J. Lu, C. Wang, J. Zhang and J. Tao, “A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 261-288, 2019.
L. Kalliovirta, M. Meitza and P. Saikkonen, “Gaussian mixture vector autoregression,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 485-498, 2016.
J. Valecký, “Mixture normal Value at Risk models of some European market portfolios,” in 6th International Scientific Conference Managing and Modelling of Financial Risks, Ostrava, 2012.
R. Chen and L. Yu, “A novel nonlinear value-at-risk method for modeling risk of option portfolio with multivariate mixture of normal distributions,” Economic Modelling, vol. 35, p. 796–804, 2013.
K. Dowd, “Value-at-Risk,” Wiley StatsRef:Statistics Reference Online, pp. 1-11, 2014.
A. Khalili, J. Chen and D. A. Stephens, “Regularization and selection in Gaussian mixture of autoregressive models,” The Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 356-374, 2017.
H. D. Nguyen, M. J. Geoffrey, J. F. Ullmann and A. L. Janke, “Laplace mixture autoregressive models,” Statistics and Probability Letters, vol. 110, pp. 18-24, 2016.
H. D. Nguyen and G. J. McLachlan, “Laplace mixture of linear experts,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 93, vol. 93, pp. 177-191, 2016.
B. Miftahurrohmah, N. Iriawan and K. Fithriasari, “On The Value at Risk Using Bayesian Mixture Laplace Autoregressive Approach for Modelling the Islamic Stock Risk Investment,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 855, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.
P. H. Kupiec, “Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models,” The Journal of Derivatives, vol. 3, pp. 73-84, 1995.
F. Iorgulescu, “Backtesting value-at-risk: Case study on the Romanian capital market,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 62, p. 796 – 800, 2012.
R. Summinga-Sonagadu and J. Narsoo, “Risk Model Validation: An Intraday VaR and ES Approach Using the Multiplicative,” Risk, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1-23, 2019.
P. Jorion, Value at Risk The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 3 ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
A. S. Ahmar and E. B. d. Val, “SutteARIMA: Short-term forecasting method, a case: Covid-19 and stock,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 729, no. 138883, pp. 1-6, 2020.
C. Proppe, “Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Methods for Structural Reliability Analysis,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 199, pp. 1122-1127, 2017.
S. H. Cheung and S. Bansal, “A new Gibbs sampling based algorithm for Bayesian model updating with incomplete complex modal data,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 92, pp. 156-172, 2017.
N. N. Zakaria, M. Othman, R. Sokkalingam, H. Daud, L. Abdullah and E. A. Kadir, “Markov Chain Model Development for Forecasting Air Pollution Index of Miri, Sarawak,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 1-11, 2019.
J. K. Kruschke, Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, Bloomington: Academic Press, 2015.
D. J. Spiegelhalter, N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin and A. van der Linde, “Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit” (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64, pp. 583-639, 2002.
J. C. Chan and A. L. Grant, “Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 100, pp. 847-859, 2016.
K. Dowd, “Retrospective Assessment of Value-at-Risk,” Risk Management: A Modern Perspective, pp. 183-202, 2006.
O. C. Ibe, Fundamentals of Applied Probability and Random Processes, 2nd ed., Lowell: Elsevier, 2014.
N. P. Lemoine, “Moving beyond noninformative priors: why and how to choose weakly informative priors in Bayesian analyses,” Oikos, vol. 128, p. 912–928, 2019.
B. P. Charlin and S. Chip, “Bayesian Model Choice via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 473-484, 1995.
H. Sanel and V. Mia, “Backtesting Value at Risk Forecast: The Case of Kupiec Pof-Test,” European Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 393-404, 2016.
K. K. Gokmenoglu and N. Fazlollahi, “The Interactions among Gold, Oil, and Stock Market: Evidence from S&P 500,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 25, no. Special issue, pp. 478-488, 2015.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
All accepted papers will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. CC-BY Licenced means lets others to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially).
