Students' ideas about equilibrium, friction and dissipation
Abstract
Students' ideas on the explanation of motion phenomena will be presented. It will be shown that the researches have taken as the framework in which to place students' ideas, the scientific model of Newtonian mechanics centered on the force concept with little, if none, consideration on the real life motion phenomena which may be considered an important experential source of students interpretations. Equilibrium, friction and dissipation are key concepts for the analysis of these real life experiences. The analysis will also focus on the epistemological aspects related to the methodology of an experential science in the relation observations/experiments/theories/models. Historical considerations of the key concepts mentioned above will give evidence, besides furnishing a cultural background, of the problematic aspects of friction and dissipation. Suggestions for teachers' training will be discussed with a focus on conceptual change and on thinking about the possibility of changing the content organization of physics teaching in such a way as to take into consideration the experential roots of intuitive physics scheme.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-13
How to Cite
Albanese, A., Neves, M. C. D., & Vicentini, M. (2008). Students’ ideas about equilibrium, friction and dissipation. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 20, 461-472. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v20i0.3068
Issue
Section
Physics
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 3.0 properly.
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by