Analysis of the problem with chang phase

  • Gracielle Johann UNIOESTE
  • Edson Antonio da Silva UNIOESTE

Abstract

The present work aims the employment of the boundary elements method for the solution to the one-dimensional solidification problem in Cartesian coordinates. The boundary elements method transforms the original problem, which was the resolution of a partial differential equation, for the solution to a system of non linear equations, and it has as unknows the front position of freezing and the flows of heat at each one of the extremities. The results obtained with the numeric simulations were compared with a problem that presents analytic solution. The method employed showed fast and efficient for the solution to the problem investigated, and the agreement was verified between the result obtained with numeric solution and the one with analytic solution. The analysis showed that the boundary elements method was efficient for the solution to the problem of change phase, and the proposed methodology can be applied for more complex situations that do not present analytic solution

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Edson Antonio da Silva, UNIOESTE
possui graduação em Engenharia Química pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá (1992) , mestrado em Engenharia Química pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá (1995) e doutorado em Engenharia Química pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (2001) . Atualmente é Professor Adjunto da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná. Tem experiência na área de Engenharia Química , com ênfase em Operações Industriais e Equipamentos para Engenharia Química. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: modelagem, biossorção, cromo, cobre, Colunas de leito fixo Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-03-27
How to Cite
Johann, G., & Silva, E. A. da. (2008). Analysis of the problem with chang phase. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 27(2), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v27i2.1454
Section
Chemical Engineering

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus