Chemical extractors on copper phytoavailability evaluation in soils from the state of Paraná
Abstract
Chemical extractors behaviors were evaluated in soils which received copper manuring, according to two essays with soybean and corn as testing plants in greenhouse. The experimental design was completely randomized with three replications. The treatment consisted of three doses of Cu (0.0, 2.5 and 5.0 mg.dm-3) used in CuSO4.5H2O solution. The extractor solutions were Mehlich 1 (HCl 0.05M+ H2SO4 0.025M), EDTA 0.005M and DTPA 0.005M-TEA at pH 7.3, so that copper contents in those soils and plants were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. The extractors evaluation was done considering linear regression among copper contents in plants dry matter and in soils. In both cultures the DTPA 0.005M-TEA at pH 7.3 showed higher superior coefficients of correlation in relation to the other extractors, revealing itself as the best extractor to evaluate copper phytoavailability in these studied soils.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-14
How to Cite
Vasconcelos, H. L., Luchese, E. B., & Lenzi, E. (2008). Chemical extractors on copper phytoavailability evaluation in soils from the state of Paraná. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 21, 793-767. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v21i0.3019
Issue
Section
Chemistry
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 3.0 properly.
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by