Chemical extractors on copper phytoavailability evaluation in soils from the state of Paraná

  • Helder Lopes Vasconcelos UNIOESTE
  • Eduardo Bernardi Luchese UEM
  • Ervim Lenzi UEM

Abstract

Chemical extractors behaviors were evaluated in soils which received copper manuring, according to two essays with soybean and corn as testing plants in greenhouse. The experimental design was completely randomized with three replications. The treatment consisted of three doses of Cu (0.0, 2.5 and 5.0 mg.dm-3) used in CuSO4.5H2O solution. The extractor solutions were Mehlich 1 (HCl 0.05M+ H2SO4 0.025M), EDTA 0.005M and DTPA 0.005M-TEA at pH 7.3, so that copper contents in those soils and plants were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. The extractors evaluation was done considering linear regression among copper contents in plants dry matter and in soils. In both cultures the DTPA 0.005M-TEA at pH 7.3 showed higher superior coefficients of correlation in relation to the other extractors, revealing itself as the best extractor to evaluate copper phytoavailability in these studied soils.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Helder Lopes Vasconcelos, UNIOESTE
Possui graduação em Química Industrial pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (1992) e mestrado em Química pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá (1996). Atualmente é professor assistente da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná e doutorando em Química pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Tem experiência na área de Química, com ênfase em Análise de Traços e Química Ambiental, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: adsorção de metais por biopolímeros Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-05-14
How to Cite
Vasconcelos, H. L., Luchese, E. B., & Lenzi, E. (2008). Chemical extractors on copper phytoavailability evaluation in soils from the state of Paraná. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 21, 793-767. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v21i0.3019
Section
Chemistry

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus