<b>Analysis and design of reinforced concrete deep beams using the stress fields method

  • Marcos Vinicius Gil Silveira Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Rafael Alves de Souza Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Keywords: stress field method, Strut-and-Tie Method, Jconc, D regions, deep beams.

Abstract

Bernoulli's hypothesis facilitates the understanding of some structural elements. However, this hypothesis cannot be applied for some special regions, denominated ‘D regions’ or ‘Discontinuity regions’. Deep beams are usually classified into this category and, for this reason, the Brazilian structural code (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas [ABNT], 2014) proposes the design of these elements using Strut-and-Tie Method (STM), which is based on forces acting in hypothetical truss models. Different from the Strut-and-Tie Method (STM), the Stress Field Method (SFM) is based on the knowledge of the stresses acting inside of a structure. Both methods have the same purpose, identify the load carrying mechanisms inside of a complex region. In order to evaluate the potential of the so-mentioned methods, the Jconc software package, which is based on the Non-Linear Elastic-Plastic Stress Fields (NL-EPSF), was applied for the design and analysis of some deep beams. Based on some validations and comparisons, it was possible to propose a solution based on the SFM for the analysis, design, and detailing of deep beams. Finally, the parameters established by the ABNT (2014) for the deep beams were evaluated based on the simulations.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcos Vinicius Gil Silveira, Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Professor assistente do departamente de engenharia civil da UEM.
Rafael Alves de Souza, Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Professor Titual do departamente de engenharia civil da UEM.
Published
2017-12-15
How to Cite
Silveira, M. V. G., & Souza, R. A. de. (2017). <b&gt;Analysis and design of reinforced concrete deep beams using the stress fields method. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 39(5), 587-594. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v39i5.28409
Section
Civil Engineering

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus