Resumen
The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of different brands of universal dental adhesives used for composite restorations. Four adhesive brands were included: Single-Bond Universal (SB), Tetric N-Bond Universal VivaPen (TN), OptiBond All-In-One (OB), and G-Premio Bond (GP). Adhesives were applied 5 times daily in a standardized class II cavity onto a plastic tooth. A precision-analysis scale was used to measure all of the following parameters before and after use: adhesive bottle, applicator, dosing plate, and plastic tooth. CEA was done by measuring the amount of material utilized/day, waste/day, efficacy, efficiency, average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Data were analyzed using Kruskal?Wallis and Dunn?s tests with Bonferroni correction at 0.05 significance level. CEA tested parameters were significantly different between groups (p < 0.001) except for ICER (p = 0.112). GP was the least effective (median = 0.062), and SB was the least efficient (median = 0.366). The highest and lowest ACER values were associated with TN (median cost ? USD 317) and SB (median cost ? USD 317), respectively. ICER analysis reported an incremental cost for extra material utilized per milliliter of ?USD 208 for TN, USD 3.8 for GP, and USD -38 for OB, compared to SB. TN seems to be the most efficient and cost-effective dental adhesive.