Next Article in Journal
A Review of Blockchain-Based Secure Sharing of Healthcare Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study for Patch-Level and Pixel-Level Segmentation of Deep Learning Methods on Transparent Images of Environmental Microorganisms: From Convolutional Neural Networks to Visual Transformers
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of Wavelength Division Multiplexing-Based Passive Optical Network Protection Schemes by Means of the Network Availability Evaluator
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Application of Pixel Interval Down-Sampling (PID) for Dense Tiny Microorganism Counting on Environmental Microorganism Images
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in ZnO-Based Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Antimicrobial in Water Treatment: A Review

1
Department of Environmental Engineering, School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(15), 7910; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157910
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 3 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 7 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Carbon Water Treatment and Energy Recovery)

Abstract

:
Advances in nanotechnology have led to the development of antimicrobial technology of nanomaterials. In recent years, photocatalytic antibacterial disinfection methods with ZnO-based nanomaterials have attracted extensive attention in the scientific community. In addition, recently widely and speedily spread viral microorganisms, such as COVID-19 and monkeypox virus, have aroused global concerns. Traditional methods of water purification and disinfection are inhibited due to the increased resistance of bacteria and viruses. Exploring new and effective antimicrobial materials and methods has important practical application value. This review is a comprehensive overview of recent progress in the following: (i) preparation methods of ZnO-based nanomaterials and comparison between methods; (ii) types of nanomaterials for photocatalytic antibacterials in water treatment; (iii) methods for studying the antimicrobial activities and (iv) mechanisms of ZnO-based antibacterials. Subsequently, the use of different doping strategies to enhance the photocatalytic antibacterial properties of ZnO-based nanomaterials is also emphatically discussed. Finally, future research and practical applications of ZnO-based nanomaterials for antibacterial activity are proposed.

1. Introduction

With rapid global population growth, urbanization increasing, illicit misuse of freshwater resources, and continued destruction of the global climate, the increasing demand for clean water is becoming a global concern [1,2,3]. Seven billion people, more than 15% of the world’s people, are facing a shortage of fresh water resources, which even causes them to not have enough fresh water to sustain normal life and productive work [4,5]. Water scarcity is exacerbated by the increasing water pollution from releases of waterborne pathogens, inorganic pollutants, organic pollutants, agricultural chemicals, derivatives of human and animal drugs, and endocrine disruptors [6,7,8].
Infectious diseases caused by biological contamination such as typhoid fever, dysentery, cholera, and diarrhea are a major cause of death worldwide and continue to replicate at an alarming rate [9]. The extensive use of antibiotics and antibacterial drugs has led to strong drug resistance in viruses and bacteria, which further exacerbates the spread of biological infectious diseases [10]. In addition, the recent epidemics of global security issues such as the COVID-19 virus and monkeypox virus are caused by the spread of viruses that threaten all human beings and have a great impact on human production, life, and health [11,12,13,14]. Similar to bacteria and pathogenic microorganisms, epidemic viruses are always difficult to eradicate due to the abuse of antibiotics and various disadvantages of disinfectants [15,16]. In view of the above situation, it is crucial to explore more effective solutions and approaches.
Recent advancements in semiconductor materials and new nanomaterials have blazed new trails for their applications in the fields of photocatalysis and bacterial inactivation [9]. Nanotechnology provides a variety of promising nanomaterials for the field of photocatalytic antimicrobial. Metal oxides have many advantages such as non-toxic, stable, and efficient biological properties, which make them stand out among many nanomaterials and become a research hotspot in this field. Numerous nanomaterials doped with metal oxides such as ZnO [17], Fe2O3 [18], TiO2 [19], Ag2O [20], CaO [20], MgO [21], and CuO [22] have been applied as efficient antibacterial agents for both Gram-positive (G+) and Gram-negative (G-) bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Fecal intestinal cocci, etc. [23]. Among the antibacterial agents, ZnO-based nanomaterials are widely recognized as promising antibacterial agents with strong photocatalytic antibacterial activity [24,25]. Nevertheless, the wide bandgap of ZnO is approximately 3.2–3.3 eV, which affects its light absorption ability, resulting in a response only in the ultraviolet band [26]. Previous studies indicated that defects of nanomaterials in photocatalytic antibacterial processes could be effectively improved after being modified [27]. Strategies, such as loading antibacterial agents, loading oxidized nanomaterials, and adjusting the particle size, material microshape, and concentration of ZnO were employed to enhance the antibacterial properties. While exploring the antibacterial ability improvement, the antibacterial mechanism should also be in-depth investigated.
In previous studies, some mechanisms for photocatalytic antimicrobials, such as metal ion release, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [28], destruction of cell membranes, internalization of nanoparticles [29], interruption or blockade of transmembrane transport, etc., have been proposed [30,31]. Overall, the purpose of all antibacterial mechanisms is to disrupt the bacterial cell structure and break it down into harmless substances. However, our understanding of the specific process of substance transformation during the photocatalyst-induced antimicrobial process is still very limited, which requires further exploration.
This review is an exhaustive summary of recent research advances on the antimicrobial of ZnO-based nanomaterials. By summarizing previous studies, ZnO-based nanomaterials with excellent antibacterial effects were obtained. From the perspective of material preparation, different preparation methods are reviewed, and both the advantages and disadvantages are compared. Subsequently, the antimicrobial mechanism of ZnO-based nanomaterials is discussed in-depth from both the physical and chemical aspects. In detail, various strategies to enhance the antimicrobial ability of ZnO-based nanomaterials in recent studies are proposed. Finally, temporary deficiencies in the improvement strategy are summed up, and prospects for the future development direction and application potential are presented.

2. ZnO-Based Nanostructures Preparation

Among the numerous methods for preparing ZnO-based nanomaterials, the wet-chemical/solution technique has many advantages such as simplicity, rapid operation, and cost savings, which make it a promising method for the preparation of ZnO-based nanomaterials. The advantages and disadvantages of commonly used wet-chemical/solution techniques, such as the sol–gel method, co-precipitation method, microwave-assisted method, and hydrothermal method, are presented in detail in Table 1. The preparatory stage of ZnO nanomaterial growth is fully wetted by wet-chemical/solution techniques, which greatly improves the stability of the materials.

2.1. Sol–Gel Method

The sol–gel method is one of the most effective chemical methods for nanocomposites preparation with desired properties and advantages, such as low cost, mild reaction, environmental friendliness, reliability, and simplicity [43]. In the preparation of photocatalytic materials, the materials synthesized by this method have better photocatalytic activity [44]. ZnO nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using the gel-sol method by Hasnidawani [45], and the surface morphology was verified by Fe-SEM images (Figure 1), which was confirmed to have a rod-like structure with a dense particle structure. Varieties of ZnO nanostructures have been discovered, which are in the form of nanorods, nanotubes, nanobelts, nano springs, nano spirals, nano rings, and many more [46]. Among these structures, the rod-like structure is the best nanostructure compared to others due to their one-dimensional nanostructures (such as nanorods, nanowires, and nanotubes) that can facilitate more efficient carrier transport for the decreased grain boundaries, surface defects, disorders, and discontinuous interfaces [47,48]. In the process of preparing ZnO-based nanomaterials by the sol–gel method, the influence of factors such as solution drop acceleration rate, reaction temperature, pH, etc., will have a significant impact on the antibacterial properties of the materials [49]. Effects of various preparation influencing factors on the antibacterial properties of ZnO were tested, and pH was proven to be the most important influencing factor [50]. The reason is suggested to be that the neutral and acidic solution environment is more suitable for Zn2+ to function and achieve an antibacterial effect. As long as the optimal pH and preparation temperature are found, the sol–gel method will be one of the effective preparation methods with high efficiency and low cost. Therefore, in recent studies, the sol–gel method is used more in the synthetization of ZnO-based nanoparticles [51,52,53].

2.2. Co-Precipitation Method

The co-precipitation method does not require expensive raw materials and complicated equipment, which provides a suitable method for low-cost and large-scale production [54]. Furthermore, in addition to simpler devices, suitable metals, metal oxides, and surfactants are added to change the morphology of the materials [55]. The co-precipitation method was chosen to prepare ZnO-based nanoparticles in an aqueous solution at two different reaction temperatures (50 °C and 70 °C) by Kotresh et al. [56]. The surface morphology of ZnO nanoparticles prepared by the co-precipitation method was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) images as shown in Figure 2. It can be seen from the SEM images that the particles are uniformly spherical with a dense and dense structure. The spherical ZnO nanoparticles prepared by the co-precipitation method are favorable for uniform dispersion in the photocatalytic reaction and efficiency improvement of photocatalytic reactions. However, it was found that the droplet acceleration rate had the greatest impact on the antibacterial properties of ZnO-based nanomaterials synthesized by the co-precipitation method [57]. The size of the nanoparticles synthesized by the co-precipitation method is affected by the drop rate of the solution, which will affect the contact area of the nanoparticles during the antibacterial reaction, thereby greatly affecting the antibacterial effect [58]. Therefore, the droplet acceleration rate and particle size need to be carefully considered during synthesis, which is an important part of the success of the co-precipitation method. Due to the advantages of the co-precipitation method with a simple preparation process, the use of this method has gradually increased in nanomaterial synthesis research in recent years [59,60,61].

2.3. Microwave-Assisted Method

The microwave-assisted method is not only an energy-saving, environmentally friendly, and heat-free method, but also with many advantages such as fast synthesis speed and the ability to tune the particle shape [44,62]. ZnO nanoparticles with different morphologies can be synthesized by the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method by adjusting the time and power of microwave irradiation [63,64]. Through microwave-assisted chemistry techniques, ZnO nanostructures with different morphologies were synthesized in different pH reaction mixtures (acidic, basic, or neutral). Furthermore, nanomaterials are synthesized without any heating and addition of surfactants. Hence, obtaining ZnO particles with oxygen vacancies and defects is expected to improve their pollutant degradation behavior due to the fast reaction process and non-stoichiometric synthesis [65]. As shown in Figure 3, the microscopic morphology of the microwave-synthesized ZnO nanostructures was observed by SEM. It can be seen intuitively that the appearance of ZnO nanoparticles changes dramatically with the pH change. In addition, from the XRD analysis in Figure 4, it was demonstrated that the change in intensity and peak width of the two sets of samples (prepared with NaOH and KOH as pH control agents) can be observed as the solution pH changes. The above results showed that the shape of synthesized ZnO nanoparticles is affected by pH changes, which has important implications for the directional synthesis of nanoparticles with diverse morphologies. In addition, several studies have shown that the power of the microwave is the most important factor affecting the synthesis of ZnO-based nanomaterials by microwave-assisted method [66,67]. Moderate-power microwave have been shown to be suitable for the synthesis of ZnO-based nanomaterials with stronger antibacterial capabilities [68,69]. However, the exact power influence mechanism needs to be further explored.

2.4. Hydrothermal Method

The hydrothermal method is a convenient and highly efficient method, which requires a lower reaction temperature and saves costs [70]. In addition, by adjusting the duration, density, and reaction temperature of the contained substances, the morphology and size of the particles can be controlled [71]. As shown in Figure 5a–c, TEM images of synthesized ZnO particles at precursor concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 mM are revealed. The morphological features of the poorly dispersed nano-ZnO crystals are clearly demonstrated by the TEM images in all cases. At precursor concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 mM, ZnO nanoparticles were observed to have diameters of approximately 4.5, 6, and 8–9 nm, respectively. Furthermore, it was also observed from the images that the size distribution of the nanoparticles was fairly uniform [72]. As shown in the XRD pattern (Figure 6), the crystalline structure of the synthesized ZnO particles after hydrothermal treatment was confirmed. Simultaneously, no impurity peaks were detected from the XRD pattern, indicating that the target substance with a higher purity was successfully synthesized [72]. Furthermore, the preferred orientation of the ZnO particle samples was not seen from XRD patterns, suggesting that ZnO crystals may have the most shapes other than rods or sheets. Based on the above conclusions, the hydrothermal method is a suitable method to prepare ZnO-based nanoparticles with different shapes. In addition, the antibacterial effect of ZnO-based nanomaterials prepared by hydrothermal method is affected by several factors, such as pH, reaction temperature, and dosage ratio [73,74]. The reaction temperature directly affects the structure of the material and changes the antibacterial ability, while the pH changes the surface properties and shape of the material to affect the antibacterial ability [75].

3. Types of Nanomaterials for Photocatalytic Antimicrobials in Water Treatment

A variety of nanomaterials as efficient adsorption materials and catalytic degradation and purification of wastewater will be discussed in this section. As shown in Figure 7, various microbial contaminants and their sources, as well as different nanomaterials for removal applications are revealed [76]. Limitations of single nanomaterials can be overcome by various strategies such as polymer/metal oxide nanocomposite [77], metal oxide/metal-based nanomaterials [78,79], polymer/metal oxide nanocomposite [80,81], and polymer-structure-based materials [82,83].
The nanocomposite is a safe, non-toxic, green and environmentally friendly nanomaterial, usually prepared with ZnO and TiO2 as substrates. The addition of TiO2 and ZnO NPs in some polymers such as polypropylene matrix would increase the dielectric constant of the nanocomposite, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic ability of the material [84]. In addition, the polymer boundary layer transition zone forms a crystalline structure, which increases conductivity and acts as a tuning surfactant [85], which greatly enhances the photoreactivity of the catalytic material. A variety of composite nanomaterials have been reported that can be applied to organic pollutants and microbial contamination removal from water [86]. Moreover, the addition of Ag, zinc, zeolite, and titanium is obtained having better efficiencies in pathogenic pathogens and microorganisms removal from water [87,88]. For example, silver NPs with polyurethane will flexibly remove almost 100% of B. subtilis and E. coli from water [89,90].
Among the composite nanomaterial antibacterial agents, ZnO-based nanomaterials have the advantages of strong compatibility, green friendliness, lower costs, and simple preparation, so they occupy a large proportion of the related studies in this field in recent years. Studies showed that ZnO has stronger direct interactions with bacterial and pathogen cell surfaces than other semiconductor materials [91]. In addition, ZnO nanomaterials leak Zn2+ in solution, which can exacerbate toxicity to bacteria, pathogens, and viruses. Compared with Cu+, Fe2+, and Al3+, Zn2+ showed a better ability to fight microbial contaminants [92]. Therefore, ZnO-based nanomaterials have a better potential to combat microbial contamination, which is of practical significance for the study of antimicrobial contamination. Among types of microbial pollution in the water environment, bacterial pollution is still the most important problem to be solved. Thus, in the next section, the antimicrobial properties and mechanisms of ZnO-based nanomaterials, as well as methods for studying antimicrobial properties are introduced, and the methods for improving their catalytic properties are summarized and discussed.

4. ZnO-Based Nanomaterials for Antimicrobial Application in Water Treatment

The antibacterial activity of ZnO-based nanomaterials is greatly affected by the morphology and particle diameter. Considerable methods for the preparation of ZnO-based nanomaterials with different morphologies have been reported in the literature, such as nanorods [93,94,95,96], nano/micro flowers [97,98,99,100,101], microspheres [102], nano powders [103,104,105], nanotubes [4], quantum dots [106,107], films [107], nanoparticles [108], and capped nanoparticles [109], to understand their application prospects for antibacterial agents. To conduct an in-depth exploration of the antibacterial properties of ZnO-based nanomaterials, the antibacterial research methods in this chapter are firstly introduced, and then the antibacterial mechanism and material improvement strategies are expounded to discuss the latest studies in this field.

4.1. Research Methods for Antimicrobial Activities of ZnO Nanostructures

To better study the effect of antibacterial agents, many techniques have been adopted to test antibacterial properties in recent years. As shown in Table 2, various kinds of adsorbents for microbes removal in different water resources are listed, which has great reference significance for antibacterial application studies. In the process of antibacterial ability testing, the accuracy of the results is affected by many factors, such as types of bacterial species and the type of data to be tested, etc. In addition, external factors such as the experimental environment also affect antibacterial detection. Commonly, the temperature of 37 °C and incubation time of 24 h are selected for the tests. Moreover, culture media of Tryptic Soy Broth, Luria–Bertani (LB) broth, Nutrient Agar, and Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) are commonly used. Meanwhile, depending on the technique used, parameters such as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), zone of inhibition (ZOI), colony count, or optical density of bacterial cultures are selected as the basis for the evaluation. The specific application methods and practical application cases of various antibacterial detection technologies are introduced below, which are beneficial for better understanding the antibacterial properties of ZnO-based nanomaterials.

4.1.1. Disk-Diffusion Method

The disk-diffusion method is a simple and efficient antimicrobial test, also known as the Kirby–Bauer antibiotic test (KB test) [133]. Mueller–Hinton agar and Brucella blood agar are commonly used as media for this method [133]. During the disk-diffusion method, the pH of the medium is usually controlled at around 7.2. The bacterial suspension containing a specific concentration was spread on the above agar medium and the experimental environment was required to be absolutely dry [22,24,93,94,97,134,135,136]. Under sterile conditions, a certain number of ZnO-based nanomaterials were soaked on the filter paper disk using the selected solvent according to the specific requirements of the experiment. Let the disk dry and carefully mount it on the medium in a Petri dish. Solvent-soaked disks were used as controls to ensure the accuracy of the test. Next, the dishes were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, providing the right conditions for bacterial growth. Subsequently, due to the bactericidal activity of the ZnO-based nanomaterials, no bacterial growth was observed around the disks at specific distances. The minimum concentration at which ZnO-based exhibited antibacterial activity was called the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the area around the disk with no bacterial growth observed was called the zone of inhibition. The lower the MIC value, the larger diameter of the inhibition zone and the higher antibacterial activity. Based on this, the antibacterial properties of ZnO-based nanomaterials were judged [137,138].

4.1.2. Well-Diffusion Method

The medium used in the well-diffusion method is similar to the method described in Section 4.1.1, and the two methods can be used together analogously. In contrast to the disk-diffusion method, the filter paper disk is installed by drilling holes in the media plate. The wells were filled with various concentrations of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions for testing. In addition, the calculation method of MIC and ZOI can also refer to the disk-diffusion method [108,139,140,141,142]. Consistent with the disk-diffusion method, sterile conditions are also one of the most necessary environmental conditions for antimicrobial performance testing. Based on MIC and ZOI, the pros and cons of antibacterial properties of ZnO-based nanomaterials can be studied and the efficiency can be evaluated.

4.1.3. Antimicrobial Measurements in Liquid Culture Media

During the incubation period, the turbidity of the growth solution increases with bacterial growth. The liquid turbidity and cell proliferation can be measured by periodically measuring the optical density. The technique does not require reagents and special handling [143,144,145,146,147]. The basic principle of this method is to judge the quality of antibacterial performance by observing the absorbance at a specific wavelength in a spectrophotometer and regularly monitoring the corresponding bacterial growth. Umar et al. used ZnO nanomaterials as antibacterial agents to conduct growth inhibition experiments on E. coli and achieved excellent experimental results as shown in Figure 8 [101].

4.1.4. Colony Unit Measurements

Colony unit measurement, also known as the diffusion plate technique, is often used to count the amount of living bacteria cells. ZnO-based nanomaterials are introduced into agar plates or dispersed as suspensions in specific liquid media. The strains were mounted on agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for a specific time. Colony forming units are counted using an appropriate counting method. In addition, the colony forming unit (CFU) value can be used to judge the antibacterial ability of ZnO-based nanomaterials [148,149,150,151]. Stankovic et al. [152] calculated the percentage of bacterial cell reduction (R%) using Equation (1).
R % = C F U c o n t r o l C F U s a m p l e C F U s a m p l e
where CFUcontrol = numbers of CFUs per milliliter for the negative control, and CFUsample = CFUs per milliliter in the presence of ZnO dispersion.
Within a certain range, the above formula can be used to calculate the bacterial concentration, and the antibacterial performance can be investigated based on the calculation results.

4.1.5. Microtiter Plate Method

The microtiter plate method, also known as the microplate method, is a method of performing antimicrobial testing by observing changes in a variable number of small test tubes or plates of microwells. Resazurin [153], 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC), crystal violet [4] and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide (MTT) [154], etc., are put into the wells as indicator solutions. Next, known or different concentrations of the test strain was dispersed into the wells of a microtiter plate. A known concentration of ZnO nanomaterials was then dispersed into the wells after dilution in a sterile broth medium. The palate was then incubated at 37 °C for timed intervals. The bacterial cell activity can be judged by the change of absorbance to detect the antibacterial ability.

4.2. Mechanisms of ZnO-Based Antimicrobial Nanomaterials

4.2.1. Mechanisms of ZnO-Based Photocatalytic

In photocatalysis, an electron–hole couple is created under light force by reduction or oxidation reactions on the catalyst surface. The photocatalytic degradation mechanism of ZnO-based photocatalyst on pollutants is shown in Figure 9. Photocatalysis occurs when a ZnO-based photocatalyst is illuminated by light with energy greater than its band gap energy [27]. Charge separation is triggered by a light energy absorption process, which excites electrons from VB to CB, leaving holes in VB [155]. Subsequently, the photogenerated e−/h+ supports a move to the ZnO photocatalyst surface. Simultaneously, e− and h+ recombine, which reduces the quantum yield. The level of this recombination rate is affected by many factors, such as the structure of the photocatalyst and the surface modification process of the photocatalysts [156,157]. The ZnO surface is aggregated with reactive e− and h+, which promote oxidation and reduction reactions that generate excess ROS, including superoxide anion (·O2) hydroxyl radicals (·OH). Furthermore, the redox potential of the CB bottom of ZnO is more negative than that of O2/O2. Therefore, these excited electrons can generate O2·. Simultaneously, the top of the VB of ZnO is more positive than the redox potential of ·OH/H2O. Consequently, H2O molecules can be oxidized by these holes to form hydroxyl radicals. These highly reactive radicals (·OH, O2·) directly oxidize organic pollutant molecules in solutions.

4.2.2. Chemical Effect of ZnO-Based Nanomaterials on Antibacterial

In the process of exploring the antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-based nanomaterials, three main chemical antibacterial mechanisms were obtained: generation of reactive oxygenated species (ROS) [158], release of Zn2+ ions [31], and photoinduced production of H2O2 [159]. The ROS mechanism is basically the same as the photocatalytic mechanism mentioned in Section 4.2.1.
Similar exhaustive studies carried out by Li et al. [31] and Song et al. [160] demonstrated that the toxicity of Zn2+ ions to cells is one of the mechanisms for the sterilization of ZnO-based nanomaterials. The concentration of ZnO NPs in ultrapure water in the toxicity test was 5 mg/L. To compare the cytotoxicity, a Zn2+ ion solution also prepared in ultrapure water was used (concentration below 0.1 mg/L). TEM images of the treated G− strains of E. coli are shown in Figure 10. It is evident that the morphology of E. coli was deformed after modification with ZnO-based nanomaterials or Zn2+ ion solution. Figure 10b,c shows intracellular fluid leakage due to Zn2+ ions and osmotic stress. The experimental results showed that the cytotoxic effects of ZnO NPs and Zn2+ ion-treated solutions on E. coli were comparable. This fully proves that the release of Zn2+ has a positive effect on antibacterial, and it also shows that it is one of the antibacterial mechanisms of ZnO-based nanomaterials (Figure 11).
Besides the light-induced reactive oxygen species produced by ZnO NPs, many pieces of literature consider H2O2 as the main substance for antibacterial activity against dermo bacteria [28,161]. Negatively charged ROS cannot penetrate bacterial cell walls, but H2O2 can also easily penetrate bacterial cell walls. Sawai et al. [162] believed that the H2O2 produced by ZnO slurry was the main reason for the biocidal mechanism. It can also be hypothesized that after H2O2 or HO disrupts the membrane, ROS can penetrate the cell wall and enter the intracellular space, thereby enhancing the biocidal effect (Figure 12).

4.2.3. Influence of Physical Effects of ZnO-Based Nanomaterials on Antibacterial Performance

In the process of exploring the antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-based nanomaterials, there are three main chemical antibacterial mechanisms: plasma membrane disruption through ZnO interactions [163], cellular internalization of ZnO-based nanoparticles [164], and mechanical damage of the cell envelope [165].
At suitable pH, the bacterial surface is negatively charged due to the dissociation of carboxyl and other functional groups. Meanwhile, ZnO-based nanomaterials are positively charged with a zeta potential of +24 mV [161]. As shown in Figure 13, the opposite charges carried by bacterial cells and ZnO NPs are the reasons for the strong electrostatic attraction between them. Strong electrostatic interactions force particles larger than 10 nm in size to accumulate on the outer surface of the plasma membrane and neutralize the surface potential of the bacterial membrane, resulting in increased surface tension and membrane depolarization. In addition, strong electrostatic interactions can induce bacterial cell changes such as changes in cell membrane and membrane vesicle structure, rupture, morphological changes, and components, leading to bacterial cell death [166,167]. Since interactions play an important role in the bactericidal effect, surface modifiers and templates of ZnO-based nanomaterials would enhance the interaction with bacterial cell walls.
Another important mechanism is cellular internalization. Cellular internalization is simply summarized as those nanostructures with a size of less than 10 nm pass through the plasma membrane, accumulate in bacterial cells, and destroy intracellular components such as nucleic acids [164,168,169,170]. In addition, it has also been suggested that the cellular interaction of ZnO with bacteria can enhance cell permeability (Figure 14) [171]. In conclusion, cellular internalization is one of the physical methods that plays an important role in the antibacterial process of ZnO-based NPs.
The last physical mechanism is to use ZnO NPs to create cell membrane damage to destroy bacterial cells and achieve antibacterial effects. Compared with bulk ZnO materials, the presence of surface defects, uneven surface texture, and rough edges and corners on the surface of ZnO-based nanomaterials can lead to effective abrasiveness, resulting in excessive mechanical damage to bacterial cell membranes [163].

4.3. Effects of Radiation Types on the Antibacterial Activity of ZnO-Based Nanomaterials

In the process of photocatalytic antibacterial studies, ultraviolet (UV) light, sunlight, and other visible light are the most common types of radiation. In previous studies, ZnO nanomaterials have always been used for antibacterial testing under UV light due to their high band constraints [173,174,175]. From the work of Joe et al. [174], an important conclusion was found that the oxygen vacancy of ZnO crystals enhanced the photogeneration of ROS, and ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) with polar facets exhibited the most significant effect of antibacterial activity under UV light stimulation. Furthermore, Ma et al. creatively combined N-halamine-based materials with ZnO to improve the stability of ZnO’s antibacterial performance under UV light. As a simple and effective method for nanoparticle modification, this technique can be further extended to the application of ZnO nanoparticles in other polar substrates for antibacterial functionalization [176].
Despite the promising antibacterial performance of ZnO-based nanomaterials under UV-driven radiation, photocatalysis using UV-active semiconductors is difficult due to the limited use of the solar spectrum. Simultaneously, significant progress has been made in photocatalysis using visible-light-active heteronanostructured semiconductors due to their simplicity of use, practicality, reproducibility, reliability, and commercialization [177,178]. Recently, several studies have found that photocatalytic efficiency can be improved by promoting the surface charge transfer reaction of ZnO. In addition, it may also affect the absorption spectrum of many metal oxide nanoparticles including ZnO, which enables the composites to undergo photocatalytic reactions under visible light [179,180,181,182,183]. The antibacterial activity of ZnO-based nanomaterials driven by visible light is of great significance for the development of photocatalytic antibacterials. Compared with ultraviolet light, visible light is more accessible, which makes visible light photocatalysis one of the hottest research fields. In addition, studies have shown that the ability of ZnO-based nanomaterials to excite ROS under visible light will be greatly improved, which also leads to the improvement of antibacterial ability under visible light [184,185]. Therefore, the design and preparation of visible-light-driven ZnO-based nanomaterials will become a meaningful research direction in future explorations.

4.4. Strategies for Enhancing ZnO-Based Nanomaterials Antibacterial Activity

4.4.1. Alkaline Earth Metal Doping into ZnO

Common alkaline earth metals including Ca, Mg, Al, and Sr, are frequently used to introduce significantly altered NPs, such as lattice defects and ionic radius differences between metal ions and Zn2+ ions, which can improve optical properties and photodegradation activity of catalysts. Taking Sr as an example, it played an important role in enhancing the catalytic degradation ability of commonly used metal oxides such as ZnO, TiO2, which can be used for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater and photocatalytic antibacterial [186]. Due to the lack of local d orbitals in alkaline earth metals and the presence of local d orbitals in transition metals, the doping of alkaline earth metals is more effective in reducing the optical threshold energy of semiconductors than that of transition metals [187].
Antibacterial activity of Mg-doped ZnO nanostructures was investigated by Okeke et al. [188] towards E. coli, P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The zones of inhibition diameter of the Zn1−xMgxO sample against the selected bacteria pathogen are displayed in Figure 15. The results showed that all samples were susceptible to bacteria. The presence of more reactive sites allows surface defects to create space for ZnO to interact with microorganisms [189]. Therefore, the increase of surface defects in ZnO nanostructures increases the reaction sites and the rate of interaction with microorganisms. Bacteria are 250 times larger than nanoparticles [105], while the bacterias have a larger relative surface area, which makes it easier for nanoparticles of much smaller size to enter the interior of bacterial cells and cause damage.

4.4.2. Transition Metals Doping into ZnO

The addition of transition metal ions can generate electronic states in the intermediate bandgap region to change charge separation and recombination kinetics, which is beneficial to enhancing the ability of photocatalytic antibacterial [190]. Numerous common transition metals, such as Co, Cu, Ni, Fe, and Mn, are often doped into ZnO to enhance its photocatalytic antibacterial ability [191].
Fe is the most used metal for enhancing the photocatalytic antibacterial ability of ZnO. Iron has two oxidation states with ionic radii of 0.61 Å and 0.55 Å, which are used as dopants for zinc lattice sites, respectively, since their ionic radii are smaller than those of zinc +2 (0.74 Å) radius. Hence, the doping can be alternative or interstitial to increase the conductivity of the product. Chandramouli et al. [192] doped Fe into ZnO and investigated the antibacterial properties of the composites. As shown in Figure 16, TEM images of Figure 16a pure, Figure 16b Fe doped, and Figure 16c capped ZnO NPs are observed. For undoped and doped ZnO NPs, they are more spherical with dimensions of 17–19 nm. Simultaneously, the agglomeration phenomenon occurs when ZnO is doped with Fe, which is due to the greater surface area and energy. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity against E. coli showed that the capped ZnO NPs were less toxic to the organism than ZnO NPs. As shown in Figure 17, the XRD patterns associated with various different ZnO-based nanomaterials are displayed. Iron doping of ZnO reduces the grain size, resulting in a further increase in the grain size of glucose-terminated ZnO nanoparticles, which is consistent with previous reports [193]. Therefore, Fe-ZnO nanoparticles have good antibacterial activity.

4.4.3. Noble Metals Doping into ZnO

Due to the formation of Schottky barriers at the metal–semiconductor interface, noble metal ions (such as Au, Ag, Pd, etc.) doped on the ZnO surface are considered to be excellent photogenerated electron traps. In addition, noble metals delay electron–hole recombination by preventing photoexcited electrons from returning to the ZnO surface, which greatly enhances the photocatalytic antibacterial ability of the composites [194]. Of all the precious metals, silver is the most stable and suitable dopant with good thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity, which will better play the photocatalytic effect of the composite material. Therefore, it has potential as a catalyst. The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) properties of silver also contribute to visible light absorption and subsequent electron–hole pair generation for the degradation of contaminants in water and for antibacterial [195].
Ye et al. [184] reported the synthesis of a series of ZnO/Ag2MoO4/Ag(ZAA) samples with theoretical molar ratios of ZnO and Ag2MoO4 of 20:1, 30:1, and 60:1 by ultrasonic-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, and named the corresponding products as ZAA-20, ZAA-30, and ZAA-60 to investigate the optimal Ag2MoO4/Ag loadings. As shown in Figure 18, the characteristic diffraction peaks of ZnO and Ag2Mo4 can be clearly found in the XRD patterns, which indicates that the ZnO/Ag2Mo4 composite was successfully synthesized. The sharp diffraction peaks reveal the ultra-high crystallinity of the ZnO-based nanocomposites. In addition, with the increase of the molar ratio of ZnO to Ag2MoO4, the diffraction peak intensity of ZnO on the (002) and (110) crystal planes gradually weakened, while the diffraction peak intensity of Ag2MoO4 gradually increased. The antibacterial properties of ZnO nanosheets and ZAA nanocomposites against different contents of G− E. coli and G+ S. aureus were evaluated by the visible light electroplating counting method. In Figure 19, the bacterial cell numbers of all nanocomposites were shown to decrease with increasing contact time, and the photocatalytic antibacterial activities of the four ternary ZAA nanocomposites were much better than that of pure ZnO sheets. The experimental results demonstrate that the addition of noble metal Ag will significantly improve the antibacterial properties of ZnO nanomaterials.

4.4.4. Rare Earth Metal Doping into ZnO

Doping rare earth metals into ZnO can improve the ability of the composite in trapping photogenerated carriers and reducing electron–hole recombination, which can enhance the photocatalytic antibacterial ability. In the rare earth doping process, f-orbital doping is the most common and efficient way, which can improve the photocatalytic activity by enhancing the adsorption of pollutants on the catalyst surface, while reducing the band gap energy to the visible light range [196]. Lanthanide ion doping is considered a versatile strategy to tune the optical response and improve the photocatalytic performance of ZnO. Lanthanides are composed of 17 elements in the periodic table, including Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu. Lanthanides have attracted much attention due to their multifunctional properties resulting from their unique f-orbital structures, and due to the f-f or f-d intra-electron transitions, lanthanides are considered candidates for luminescent centers in doped materials, which is beneficial to prolonging the effective response time [197,198,199].
Doping ZnO with Ln3+ and Ce4+ ions can convert the magnetism from diamagnetism to ferromagnetism, improve the n-type conductivity, enhance the photo response, increase the concentration of free electrons in the CB, and increase the electron mobility [200,201,202]. A novel Z-type ZnO–CeO2-Yb2O3 heterojunction photocatalyst was prepared for the first time by Tauseef et al. [203], and its physical, photocatalytic, and antibacterial properties were investigated. Growth samples were tested for antimicrobial properties against E. coli and S. aureus. The effects of operating parameters such as catalyst dosage, dye concentration, and solution pH on the photocatalytic performance of the nanocomposites were investigated. The ZOIs of S. aureus and E. coli along with the standard antibiotic ciprofloxacin are shown in Figure 20a,b. The synthesized nanocomposites exhibited good activity against both bacteria with a ZOI > 6 mm, but higher activity against E. coli with a ZOI of 14 mm shown in Figure 21a,b. Positively charged heavy metal ions such as Zn2+, Ce4+, and Yb3+ can be released from the surface of the nanocomposite to interact with negatively charged microbial cell membranes. The entry of these metal ions into the cell membrane reduces the capacity and permeability of proteins, which in turn leads to the death of microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses. The above antibacterial action mechanism can be visualized in Figure 22C. In conclusion, the nanocomposites doped with rare earth ions are effective materials for preventing diseases caused by S. aureus and E. coli.

4.4.5. Organic Antimicrobial Agents Doping into ZnO

Studies have shown that the composites obtained by co-doping and fusion of organic antibacterial agents and ZnO nanoparticles exhibited stronger antibacterial activity than ZnO nanoparticles alone [205,206]. The organic antimicrobial agents are usually immobilized or embedded on the ZnO surface. Taking chitosan (CS) as an example, it is an abundant natural biopolymer derived from the deacetylation of chitin in crustacean shells and can be made into films, fibers, beads, and powders. Cationic polymers are generally antimicrobial [207,208]. In general, antibacterial activity depends on molecular weight (Mw), degree of deacetylation, temperature, and solution pH [209,210].
Gutha et al. [204] used CS and ZnO as raw materials to prepare a new composite material chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol)/zinc oxide (CS/PVA/ZnO), which was used as a novel antibacterial agent with wound healing properties. CS/PVA/ZnO was proved to be an effective antibacterial nanomaterial after being analyzed by various characterization methods. SEM images of various prepared CS/PVA/ZnO-related materials and precursors are shown in Figure 22A–C. The surface of sole chitosan was obtained to be smooth. The sole ZnO nanoparticles showed nanosheet-like morphology. The surface of sole CS/PVA/ZnO microbeads presents a certain pore structure, and the surface of the microbeads is rough, which is conducive to exerting the ability of photocatalytic antibacterial. The antibacterial activities of CS, CS/PVA, and CS/PVA/ZnO are shown in Figure 23. The diameter of the inhibition zone against E. coli cultures (G-) was 10 mm in the CS group, 14 mm in the CS/PVA group, and 19 mm in the CS/PVA/ZnO group (Figure 23A). Likewise, S. aureus cultures (G+) had a diameter of 12 mm in the CS group, 15 mm in the CS/PVA group, and 20 mm in the CS/PVA/ZnO group (Figure 23A).

5. Future Scope and Conclusions

5.1. Future Scope

Although ZnO-based nanomaterials have been applied in organic pollutants removal from water and conduct antibacterial reactions in water, there is still plenty of space for improvement. The following points are the aspects that can be improved and strengthened in the application process of ZnO-based nanomaterials in the future:
(1)
Exploring strategies for changing the weak toxicity of ZnO-based nanomaterials so that they can be better used in drinking water treatment, clinical medicine, virus killing, and other fields closely related to human beings.
(2)
Enhancing the ability of ZnO-based nanomaterials to respond to visible light enables them to have a wider range of applications. Visible light is one of the most abundant light sources, and a better response under visible light can maximize the use of existing energy and reduce investment.
(3)
Exploring the use of ZnO-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic removal of resistant bacteria, cancer cells, and other difficult-to-remove microorganisms and pathogen cells to improve the availability of the material.
(4)
Exploring stronger ZnO-based nanomaterial structures and carriers to improve recyclability and improve existing problems such as high solubility and difficulty in recycling.

5.2. Conclusions

This manuscript is based on recent developments in antibacterial water treatment with ZnO-based nanomaterials. Due to the increasing global requirements for water environment quality and drinking water quality, especially for the prevention and control of various epidemics, new ideas and directions are provided for our study. Therefore, the existence of bacteria and harmful microorganisms in water is introduced in detail, and various commonly used antibacterial agents and antibacterial methods are summarized. In conclusion, different morphologies of ZnO-based nanomaterials can be effectively used against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains by physicochemical interactions with bacterial cells. Cell membrane damage and biocidal activity are thought to be triggered by the collective action of chemical and physical interactions. Chemical interactions leading to the production of ROS and H2O2 and the release of Zn2+ ions from ZnO solubility have been proved to be the main cause of the above activities. Subsequently, based on this theory, an in-depth study of the antibacterial mechanism was carried out. Finally, the review also summarizes the following synthetic strategies to improve the antibacterial properties of ZnO: (1) doping of alkaline earth metals to ZnO; (2) doping of transition metals to ZnO; (3) doping of noble metals to ZnO; (4) doping of rare earth metal to ZnO; and (5) loading organic antimicrobial agents.
It can be expected that the antibacterial potential of ZnO-based nanomaterials in water treatment is very promising. Studies on ZnO-based nanomaterials continuously increased in recent years, although they still have many aspects that can be improved. In the future, we can expect more perfect ZnO-based nanomaterials to be prepared to solve more antimicrobial-related problems in water treatment.

Author Contributions

Z.X.: Investigation, Writing—Original Draft. Q.H.: Investigation. S.W.: Investigation. X.H.: Supervision, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. Z.F.: Supervision, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. X.X.: Supervision, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. X.Z.: Supervision, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan, China (2019YFC1907204). We are grateful for the test services from the Analytical and Testing Center of Northeastern University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fuzil, N.S.; Othman, N.H.; Alias, N.H.; Marpani, F.; Othman, M.H.D.; Ismail, A.F.; Lau, W.J.; Li, K.; Kusworo, T.D.; Ichinose, I.; et al. A review on photothermal material and its usage in the development of photothermal membrane for sustainable clean water production. Desalination 2021, 517, 115259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, W.; Pei, Y.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, Y.; Shu, L.; Zhang, H. Twenty years of China’s water pollution control: Experiences and challenges. Chemosphere 2022, 295, 133875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yan, C.; Qu, Z.; Wang, J.; Cao, L.; Han, Q. Microalgal bioremediation of heavy metal pollution in water: Recent advances, challenges, and prospects. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aal, N.A.; Al-Hazmi, F.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Alghamdi, A.A.; El-Tantawy, F.; Yakuphanoglu, F. Novel rapid synthesis of zinc oxide nanotubes via hydrothermal technique and antibacterial properties. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 135, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Coelho, E.F.; Santos, D.L.; Lima, L.W.F.d.; Castricini, A.; Barros, D.L.; Filgueiras, R.; da Cunha, F.F. Water regimes on soil covered with plastic film mulch and relationships with soil water availability, yield, and water use efficiency of papaya trees. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 269, 107709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sheikh, M.; Pazirofteh, M.; Dehghani, M.; Asghari, M.; Rezakazemi, M.; Valderrama, C.; Cortina, J.-L. Application of ZnO nanostructures in ceramic and polymeric membranes for water and wastewater technologies: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 391, 123475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sondermann, M.N.; Proença de Oliveira, R. Using the WEI+ index to evaluate water scarcity at highly regulated river basins with conjunctive uses of surface and groundwater resources. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 836, 155754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ouassanouan, Y.; Fakir, Y.; Simonneaux, V.; Kharrou, M.H.; Bouimouass, H.; Najar, I.; Benrhanem, M.; Sguir, F.; Chehbouni, A. Multi-decadal analysis of water resources and agricultural change in a Mediterranean semiarid irrigated piedmont under water scarcity and human interaction. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 834, 155328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, R.; Umar, A.; Kumar, G.; Nalwa, H.S. Antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanomaterials: A review. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 3940–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Witte, W. International dissemination of antibiotic resistant strains of bacterial pathogens. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2004, 4, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shahin, O.R.; Alshammari, H.H.; Taloba, A.I.; El-Aziz, R.M.A. Machine Learning Approach for Autonomous Detection and Classification of COVID-19 Virus. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2022, 101, 108055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, H.; Paulson, K.R.; Pease, S.A.; Watson, S.; Comfort, H.; Zheng, P.; Aravkin, A.Y.; Bisignano, C.; Barber, R.M.; Alam, T.; et al. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–2021. Lancet 2022, 399, 1513–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Flor, L.S.; Friedman, J.; Spencer, C.N.; Cagney, J.; Arrieta, A.; Herbert, M.E.; Stein, C.; Mullany, E.C.; Hon, J.; Patwardhan, V.; et al. Quantifying the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender equality on health, social, and economic indicators: A comprehensive review of data from March, 2020, to September, 2021. Lancet 2022, 399, 2381–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pan, D.; Sze, S.; Nazareth, J.; Martin, C.A.; Al-Oraibi, A.; Baggaley, R.F.; Nellums, L.B.; Hollingsworth, T.D.; Tang, J.W.; Pareek, M. Monkeypox in the UK: Arguments for a broader case definition. Lancet 2022, 399, 2345–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Wang, L.; Lu, W.; Li, S.; Xu, D.; Fu, Y.V. Inactivation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus with electron beam irradiation under cold chain conditions. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 27, 102715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, S.; Dong, Q.; Li, S.; Cheng, Z.; Kang, X.; Ren, D.; Xu, C.; Zhou, X.; Liang, P.; Sun, L.; et al. Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater after the end of the COVID-19 epidemics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 429, 128358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Guo, Y.; Lin, S.; Li, X.; Liu, Y. Amino acids assisted hydrothermal synthesis of hierarchically structured ZnO with enhanced photocatalytic activities. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 384, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chang, Y.-N.; Zhang, M.; Xia, L.; Zhang, J.; Xing, G.J.M. The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Creat. Commons Attrib. Licens. 2012, 5, 2850–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gupta, K.; Singh, R.P.; Pandey, A.; Pandey, A. Photocatalytic antibacterial performance of TiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2 against S. aureus. P. aeruginosa and E. coli. J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Allahverdiyev, A.M.; Abamor, E.S.; Bagirova, M.; Rafailovich, M. Antimicrobial effects of TiO2 and Ag2O nanoparticles against drug-resistant bacteria and leishmania parasites. Future Med. 2011, 6, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jin, T.; He, Y. Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 6877–6885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Azam, A.; Ahmed, A.S.; Oves, M.; Khan, M.S.; Habib, S.S.; Memic, A. Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: A comparative study. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Luo, Z.; Wu, Q.; Xue, J.; Ding, Y. Selectively enhanced antibacterial effects and ultraviolet activation of antibiotics with ZnO nanorods against Escherichia coli. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Şahin, B.; Aydin, R.; Soylu, S.; Türkmen, M.; Kara, M.; Akkaya, A.; Çetin, H.; Ayyıldız, E. The effect of thymus syriacus plant extract on the main physical and antibacterial activities of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by SILAR method. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 135, 109088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Negi, A.; Gangwar, R.; Kumar Vishwakarma, R.; Singh Negi, D. Antibacterial, antioxidant and photodegradation potential of ZnO nanoparticles mediated via roots of Taraxacum officinale radix. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 2435–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Etacheri, V.; Di Valentin, C.; Schneider, J.; Bahnemann, D.; Pillai, S.C. Visible-light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: Advances in theory and experiments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2015, 25, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Qi, K.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J.; Ho, W. Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 727, 792–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L.; Ding, Y.; Povey, M.; Cang, D. The properties of ZnO nanofluids and the role of H2O2 in the disinfection activity against Escherichia coli. Water Res. 2013, 47, 4013–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ravindranadh, M.R.K.; Mary, T.R. Development of ZnO nanoparticles for clinical applications. J. Chem. Biol. Phys. Sci. 2013, 4, 469. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Daskalakis, N.; Jeuken, L.; Povey, M.; O’Neill, A.J.; York, D.W. Mechanistic investigation into antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 12, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, M.; Zhu, L.; Lin, D. Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: Mechanism and the Influence of Medium Components. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 1977–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Choubari, M.S.; Mazloom, J.; Ghodsi, F.E. Supercapacitive properties, optical band gap, and photoluminescence of CeO2–ZnO nanocomposites prepared by eco-friendly green and citrate sol-gel methods: A comparative study. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 21385–21395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Fei, Y.; Xie, A.; Li, Y.; Sun, D. Investigation of properties of ZnO and MgxZn1-xO films prepared by sol-gel method. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1261, 132959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Castro-Lopes, S.; Guerra, Y.; Silva-Sousa, A.; Oliveira, D.M.; Gonçalves, L.A.P.; Franco, A.; Padrón-Hernández, E.; Peña-Garcia, R. Influence of pH on the structural and magnetic properties of Fe-doped ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by sol gel method. Solid State Sci. 2020, 109, 106438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Selvaraj, S.; Vangari, G.A.; Mohan, M.K.; Ponnusamy, S.; Muthamizchelvan, C. Facile synthesis of Sm doped ZnO nanoflowers by Co-precipitation method for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of MB dye under sunlight irradiation. Ceram. Int. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shivaraj, B.; Prabhakara, M.C.; Bhojya Naik, H.S.; Indrajith Naik, E.; Viswanath, R.; Shashank, M.; Kumara Swamy, B.E. Optical, bio-sensing, and antibacterial studies on Ni-doped ZnO nanorods, fabricated by chemical co-precipitation method. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 134, 109049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Soltani, S.; Roodbar Shojaei, T.; Khanian, N.; Shean Yaw Choong, T.; Asim, N.; Zhao, Y. Artificial neural network method modeling of microwave-assisted esterification of PFAD over mesoporous TiO2–ZnO catalyst. Renew. Energy 2022, 187, 760–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saravanan, P.; SenthilKannan, K.; Vimalan, M.; Tamilselvan, S.; Sankar, D. Biofriendly and competent domestic microwave assisted method for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles from the extract of Azadirachta indica leaves. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 3160–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ashok, C.H.; Venkateswara Rao, K. ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposite rods synthesized by microwave-assisted method for humidity sensor application. Superlattices Microstruct. 2014, 76, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, M.; Xu, Z.P.; Sultanbawa, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Qian, G. Potent and durable antibacterial activity of ZnO-dotted nanohybrids hydrothermally derived from ZnAl-layered double hydroxides. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 181, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krajian, H.; Abdallah, B.; Kakhia, M.; AlKafri, N. Hydrothermal growth method for the deposition of ZnO films: Structural, chemical and optical studies. Microelectron. Reliab. 2021, 125, 114352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Bao, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J. Synthesis of large-scale uniform mulberry-like ZnO particles with microwave hydrothermal method and its antibacterial property. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2803–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shastri, L.; Qureshi, M.S.; Malik, M.M. Photoluminescence study of ZnO–SiO2 nanostructures grown in silica matrix obtained via sol–gel method. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2013, 74, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hassena, H. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by using Al2O3/Fe2O3 nano composite under visible light. Mod. Chem. Appl. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hasnidawani, J.N.; Azlina, H.N.; Norita, H.; Bonnia, N.N.; Ratim, S.; Ali, E.S. Synthesis of ZnO Nanostructures Using Sol-Gel Method. Procedia Chem. 2016, 19, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bari, A.R.; Shinde, M.; Deo, V.; Patil, L. Effect of solvents on the particle morphology of nanostructured ZnO. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2009, 47, 24. [Google Scholar]
  47. Morkoç, H.; Özgür, Ü. Zinc Oxide: Fundamentals, Materials and Device Technology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  48. Moezzi, A.; McDonagh, A.M.; Cortie, M.B. Zinc oxide particles: Synthesis, properties and applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 185, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naik, E.I.; Naik, H.S.B.; Viswanath, R.; Kirthan, B.R.; Prabhakara, M.C. Effect of zirconium doping on the structural, optical, electrochemical and antibacterial properties of ZnO nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel method. Chem. Data Collect. 2020, 29, 100505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wei, S. Comparative study on sol-gel combined with a hydrothermal synthesis of ZnAl2O4 and ZnO/ZnAl2O4 nanocomposites and its photoluminescence properties and antibacterial activity. Optik 2021, 242, 167151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. El-Katori, E.E.; Kasim, E.A.; Ali, D.A.J.C.; Physicochemical, S.A.; Aspects, E. Sol–gel synthesis of mesoporous NiO/ZnO heterostructure nanocomposite for photocatalytic and anticorrosive applications in aqueous media. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 636, 128153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahmad, S.; Aadil, M.; Ejaz, S.R.; Akhtar, M.U.; Noor, H.; Haider, S.; Alsafari, I.A.; Yasmin, G.J.C.I. Sol-gel synthesis of nanostructured ZnO/SrZnO2 with boosted antibacterial and photocatalytic activity. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 2394–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jing, J.; Lin, L.; Yang, K.; Hu, H.; Guo, T.; Li, F.J.O.E. Highly efficient inverted quantum dot light-emitting diodes employing sol-gel derived Li-doped ZnO as electron transport layer. Org. Electron. 2022, 103, 106466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Devi, P.G.; Velu, A.S. Synthesis, structural and optical properties of pure ZnO and Co doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared by the co-precipitation method. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2016, 10, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Suwanboon, S.; Amornpitoksuk, P.; Sukolrat, A.; Muensit, N.J.C.I. Optical and photocatalytic properties of La-doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared via precipitation and mechanical milling method. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2811–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kotresh, M.; Patil, M.; Inamdar, S.J.O. Reaction temperature based synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using co-precipitation method: Detailed structural and optical characterization. Optik 2021, 243, 167506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Anitha, S.; Muthukumaran, S. Structural, optical and antibacterial investigation of La, Cu dual doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation method. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 108, 110387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pavithra, M.; Raj, M.J. Influence of ultrasonication time on solar light irradiated photocatalytic dye degradability and antibacterial activity of Pb doped ZnO nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 32324–32331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aziz, F.; Abo-Dief, H.M.; Warsi, A.-Z.; Warsi, M.F.; Shahid, M.; Ahmad, T.; Mersal, G.A.; Ibrahim, M.M. Facile synthesis of NiO/ZnO nano-composite by Co-precipitation, characterization and photocatalytic study of colored and colorless organic pollutants by solar irradiation. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 640, 413858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bhogaita, M.; Devaprakasam, D. Hybrid photoanode of TiO2-ZnO synthesized by co-precipitation route for dye-sensitized solar cell using phyllanthus reticulatas pigment sensitizer. Sol. Energy 2021, 214, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Patel, N.; Patel, I.; Bharat, V. Structural, thermal and chemical studies of Mn doped ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by Co-precipitation method. Mater. Proc. 2021, 46, 2277–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saleh, S.M. ZnO nanospheres based simple hydrothermal route for photocatalytic degradation of azo dye. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 211, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ahammed, K.R.; Ashaduzzaman, M.; Paul, S.C.; Nath, M.R.; Bhowmik, S.; Saha, O.; Rahaman, M.; Bhowmik, S.; Aka, T. Microwave assisted synthesis of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles in a noble approach: Utilization for antibacterial and photocatalytic activity. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sanakousar, F.; Vidyasagar, C.; Jiménez-Pérez, V.; Prakash, K. Recent progress on visible-light-driven metal and non-metal doped ZnO nanostructures for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing 2022, 140, 106390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arellano-Cortaza, M.; Ramirez-Morales, E.; Pal, U.; Pérez-Hernández, G.; Rojas-Blanco, L. pH dependent morphology and texture evolution of ZnO nanoparticles fabricated by microwave-assisted chemical synthesis and their photocatalytic dye degradation activities. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 27469–27478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jin, C.; Lu, Y.; Tong, G.; Che, R.; Xu, H. Excellent microwave absorbing properties of ZnO/ZnFe2O4/Fe core-shell microrods prepared by a rapid microwave-assisted hydrothermal-chemical vapor decomposition method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 531, 147353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Skoda, D.; Urbanek, P.; Sevcik, J.; Munster, L.; Antos, J.; Kuritka, I. Microwave-assisted synthesis of colloidal ZnO nanocrystals and their utilization in improving polymer light emitting diodes efficiency. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 232–235, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chong, W.J.; Shen, S.; Li, Y.; Trinchi, A.; Pejak Simunec, D.; Kyratzis, I.; Sola, A.; Wen, C. Biodegradable PLA-ZnO nanocomposite biomaterials with antibacterial properties, tissue engineering viability, and enhanced biocompatibility. Smart Mater. Manuf. 2022, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Okeke, I.S.; Agwu, K.K.; Ubachukwu, A.A.; Ezema, F.I. Influence of transition metal doping on physiochemical and antibacterial properties of ZnONanoparticles: A review. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, 100227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kamarulzaman, N.; Kasim, M.F.; Rusdi, R. Band gap narrowing and widening of ZnO nanostructures and doped materials. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Shahmoradi, B.; Ibrahim, I.; Namratha, K.; Sakamoto, N.; Ananda, S.; Somashekar, R.; Byrappa, K. Surface modification of indium doped ZnO hybrid nanoparticles with n-butylamine. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Res. 2010, 2, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sahoo, T.; Kim, M.; Baek, J.H.; Jeon, S.-R.; Kim, J.S.; Yu, Y.-T.; Lee, C.-R.; Lee, I.-H. Synthesis and characterization of porous ZnO nanoparticles by hydrothermal treatment of as pure aqueous precursor. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yuvarani, A.; Vaideeswaran, R.; Sophia Rani, I.; Reeta Mary, I. Physical characterization and antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanostructures synthesized via facile hydrothermal method. Mater. Today Proc. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Siwińska-Stefańska, K.; Kubiak, A.; Piasecki, A.; Dobrowolska, A.; Czaczyk, K.; Motylenko, M.; Rafaja, D.; Ehrlich, H.; Jesionowski, T. Hydrothermal synthesis of multifunctional TiO2-ZnO oxide systems with desired antibacterial and photocatalytic properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 463, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ashar, A.; Bhatti, I.A.; Siddique, T.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Mirza, S.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Shoaib, M.; Ali, M.; Taj, M.B.; Iqbal, M.; et al. Integrated hydrothermal assisted green synthesis of ZnO nano discs and their water purification efficiency together with antimicrobial activity. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 6901–6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chithra, A.; Sekar, R.; Kumar, P.S.; Padmalaya, G.J.C. A review on removal strategies of microorganisms from water environment using nanomaterials and their behavioural characteristics. Chemosphere 2022, 295, 133915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hassouna, M.; ElBably, M.; Mohammed, A.N.; Nasser, M.A.G. Assessment of carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles loaded clays as adsorbents for removal of bacterial contaminants from water sources. J. Water Health 2017, 15, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kokkinos, P.; Mantzavinos, D.; Venieri, D.J.M. Current trends in the application of nanomaterials for the removal of emerging micropollutants and pathogens from water. Molecules 2020, 25, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Raghunath, A.; Perumal, E. Metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: A promise for the future. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 49, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soytaş, S.H.; Oğuz, O.; Menceloğlu, Y.Z. Polymer nanocomposites with decorated metal oxides. In Polymer Composites with Functionalized Nanoparticles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 287–323. [Google Scholar]
  81. Chen, G.-Q.; Wu, Y.-H.; Wang, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.; Tong, X.; Bai, Y.; Luo, L.-W.; Xu, C.; Hu, H.-Y. Effects of microbial inactivation approaches on quantity and properties of extracellular polymeric substances in the process of wastewater treatment and reclamation: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jayaramudu, T.; Ko, H.-U.; Zhai, L.; Li, Y.; Kim, J. Preparation and characterization of hydrogels from polyvinyl alcohol and cellulose and their electroactive behavior. Soft Mater. 2017, 15, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dayanidhi, K.; Vadivel, P.; Jothi, S.; Eusuff, N.S. Facile synthesis of Silver@ Eggshell nanocomposite: A heterogeneous catalyst for the removal of heavy metal ions, toxic dyes and microbial contaminants from water. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 110962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, J.-F.; Xu, Z.-L.; Yang, H.; Yu, L.-Y.; Liu, M. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4725–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Suman; Kardam, A.; Gera, M.; Jain, V. A novel reusable nanocomposite for complete removal of dyes, heavy metals and microbial load from water based on nanocellulose and silver nano-embedded pebbles. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gao, F.; Hou, X.; Wang, A.; Chu, G.; Wu, W.; Chen, J.; Zou, H. Preparation of polypyrrole/TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Particuology 2016, 26, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kalló, D. Applications of natural zeolites in water and wastewater treatment. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2001, 45, 519–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Inoue, Y.; Hoshino, M.; Takahashi, H.; Noguchi, T.; Murata, T.; Kanzaki, Y.; Hamashima, H.; Sasatsu, M. Bactericidal activity of Ag–zeolite mediated by reactive oxygen species under aerated conditions. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002, 92, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, S.; Huang, R.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, J.; Lau, B.L.; Wiesner, M.R. Silver nanoparticle-alginate composite beads for point-of-use drinking water disinfection. Water Res. 2013, 47, 3959–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Song, J.; Kong, H.; Jang, J. Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by polyrhodanine-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 359, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bellanger, X.; Schneider, R.; Dezanet, C.; Arroua, B.; Balan, L.; Billard, P.; Merlin, C. Zn2+ leakage and photo-induced reactive oxidative species do not explain the full toxicity of ZnO core Quantum Dots. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Elaaraj, I.; Raouan, S.E.R.; Nakkabi, A.; Es-sounni, B.; Koraichi, I.; El moualij, N.; Fahim, M. Synthesis, characterization and antioxidant, antibacterial activity Zn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+ and Co2+, complexes of ligand [2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole]. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ramani, M.; Ponnusamy, S.; Muthamizhchelvan, C.; Cullen, J.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Marsili, E.J.C.; Biointerfaces, S.B. Morphology-directed synthesis of ZnO nanostructures and their antibacterial activity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 105, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Jain, A.; Bhargava, R.; Poddar, P. Probing interaction of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial cells with ZnO nanorods. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013, 33, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Talebian, N.; Amininezhad, S.M.; Doudi, M. Controllable synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and their morphology-dependent antibacterial and optical properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 120, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Jansson, T.; Clare-Salzler, Z.J.; Zaveri, T.D.; Mehta, S.; Dolgova, N.V.; Chu, B.-H.; Ren, F.; Keselowsky, B.G. Antibacterial effects of zinc oxide nanorod surfaces. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 7132–7138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Elumalai, K.; Velmurugan, S.; Ravi, S.; Kathiravan, V.; Ashokkumar, S. RETRACTED: Facile, eco-friendly and template free photosynthesis of cauliflower like ZnO nanoparticles using leaf extract of Tamarindus indica (L.) and its biological evolution of antibacterial and antifungal activities. Spectrochim. Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 136, 1052–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wahab, R.; Kim, Y.-S.; Mishra, A.; Yun, S.-I.; Shin, H.-S. Formation of ZnO micro-flowers prepared via solution process and their antibacterial activity. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1675–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Kumar, K.M.; Mandal, B.K.; Naidu, E.A.; Sinha, M.; Kumar, K.S.; Reddy, P.S. Synthesis and characterisation of flower shaped zinc oxide nanostructures and its antimicrobial activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A-Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 104, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Khan, M.F.; Hameedullah, M.; Ansari, A.H.; Ahmad, E.; Lohani, M.; Khan, R.H.; Alam, M.M.; Khan, W.; Husain, F.M.; Ahmad, I. Flower-shaped ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by a novel approach at near-room temperatures with antibacterial and antifungal properties. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Umar, A.; Chauhan, M.; Chauhan, S.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, P.; Tomar, K.J.; Wahab, R.; Al-Hajry, A.; Singh, D. Applications of ZnO nanoflowers as antimicrobial agents for Escherichia coli and enzyme-free glucose sensor. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 1794–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shinde, V.V.; Dalavi, D.S.; Mali, S.S.; Hong, C.K.; Kim, J.H.; Patil, P.S. Surfactant free microwave assisted synthesis of ZnO microspheres: Study of their antibacterial activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 307, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, Y.; He, L.; Mustapha, A.; Li, H.; Hu, Z.; Lin, M. Antibacterial activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Abboud-Abi Saab, M.; Hassoun, A.E.R. Effects of organic pollution on environmental conditions and the phytoplankton community in the central Lebanese coastal waters with special attention to toxic algae. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2017, 10, 38–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yousef, J.M.; Danial, E.N. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Zinc Oxide and Nano-particle Zinc oxide Against Pathogenic Strains. Int. J. Health Sci. 2012, 2, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Wahab, R.; Khan, F.; Lutfullah; Singh, R.; Khan, A. Enhance antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanomaterial׳s (QDs and NPs) and their analytical applications. Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2014, 62, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Carvalho, P.; Sampaio, P.; Azevedo, S.; Vaz, C.; Espinos, J.P.; Teixeira, V.; Carneiro, J. Influence of thickness and coatings morphology in the antimicrobial performance of zinc oxide coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 307, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Palanikumar, L.; Ramasamy, S.N.; Balachandran, C. Size-dependent antimicrobial response of zinc oxide nanoparticles. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014, 8, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Dutta, R.K.; Nenavathu, B.P.; Gangishetty, M.K. Correlation between defects in capped ZnO nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 126, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sharma, S.; Bhattacharya, A. Drinking water contamination and treatment techniques. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 1043–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Dinesha, B.; Sharanagouda, H.; Udaykumar, N.; Ramachandr, C.; Dandekar, A.B. Removal of Pollutants from Water/Waste Water Using Nano-Adsorbents: A Potential Pollution Mitigation. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 4868–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Abu Hasan, H.; Muhammad, M.H.; Ismail, N. A review of biological drinking water treatment technologies for contaminants removal from polluted water resources. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 33, 101035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mukherjee, M.; De, S. Reduction of microbial contamination from drinking water using an iron oxide nanoparticle-impregnated ultrafiltration mixed matrix membrane: Preparation, characterization and antimicrobial properties. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1, 204–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Valbonesi, P.; Profita, M.; Vasumini, I.; Fabbri, E. Contaminants of emerging concern in drinking water: Quality assessment by combining chemical and biological analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 758, 143624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hartmann, J.; van Driezum, I.; Ohana, D.; Lynch, G.; Berendsen, B.; Wuijts, S.; van der Hoek, J.P.; Husman, A.M.D.R. The effective design of sampling campaigns for emerging chemical and microbial contaminants in drinking water and its resources based on literature mining. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sanaeepur, H.; Ebadi Amooghin, A.; Shirazi, M.M.A.; Pishnamazi, M.; Shirazian, S. Water desalination and ion removal using mixed matrix electrospun nanofibrous membranes: A critical review. Desalination 2022, 521, 115350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ali, A.; Gul, A.; Mannan, A.; Zia, M. Efficient metal adsorption and microbial reduction from Rawal Lake wastewater using metal nanoparticle coated cotton. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ahmed, M.B.; Zhou, J.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W. Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: Progress and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 532, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Marcińczyk, M.; Ok, Y.S.; Oleszczuk, P. From waste to fertilizer: Nutrient recovery from wastewater by pristine and engineered biochars. Chemosphere 2022, 306, 135310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zahmatkesh, S.; Far, S.S.; Sillanpää, M. RSM-D-optimal modeling approach for COD removal from low strength wastewater by microalgae, sludge, and activated carbon- case study Mashhad. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Azam, K.; Shezad, N.; Shafiq, I.; Akhter, P.; Akhtar, F.; Jamil, F.; Shafique, S.; Park, Y.-K.; Hussain, M. A review on activated carbon modifications for the treatment of wastewater containing anionic dyes. Chemosphere 2022, 135566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Srivastava, N.; Chattopadhyay, J. Effective utilization of biofiltration techniques for removal of pathogenic microorganisms from wastewater treatment plants. In An Innovative Role of Biofiltration in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs); Shah, M., Rodriguez-Couto, S., Biswas, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rani, M.; Paul, B.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Das, K.; Singh, P.; Basu, S.; Pandey, S.; Tripathi, D.; Kumar, A. Detection and removal of pathogenic bacteria from wastewater using various nanoparticles. In Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes; Shah, M., Rodriguez-Couto, S., Biswas, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rikta, S.Y. Application of nanoparticles for disinfection and microbial control of water and wastewater. Nanotechnol. Water Wastewater Treat. Theory Appl. 2019, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Amin, M.; Alazba, A.; Manzoor, U. A review of removal of pollutants from water/wastewater using different types of nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2014, 825910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Priyadarshni, N.; Nath, P.; Chanda, N. Sustainable removal of arsenate, arsenite and bacterial contamination from water using biochar stabilized iron and copper oxide nanoparticles and associated mechanism of the remediation process. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 37, 101495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gebre, S.H.; Sendeku, M.G. New frontiers in the biosynthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles and their environmental applications: An overview. Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Borhani, S.; Asadi, A.; Dabbagh, H.A. Preparation and characterization of PAN nanofibers containing boehmite nanoparticles for the removal of microbial contaminants and cadmium ions from water. J. Water Health 2020, 18, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Fahimirad, S.; Fahimirad, Z.; Sillanpää, M. Efficient removal of water bacteria and viruses using electrospun nanofibers. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rivera-Utrilla, J.; Bautista-Toledo, I.; Ferro-García, M.A.; Moreno-Castilla, C. Activated carbon surface modifications by adsorption of bacteria and their effect on aqueous lead adsorption. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76, 1209–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Hassan, M.; Abou-Zeid, R.; Hassan, E.; Berglund, L.; Aitomäki, Y.; Oksman, K.J.P. Membranes based on cellulose nanofibers and activated carbon for removal of Escherichia coli bacteria from water. Polymers 2017, 9, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Hussain, S.; de Las Heras, N.; Asghar, H.; Brown, N.; Roberts, E. Disinfection of water by adsorption combined with electrochemical treatment. Water Res. 2014, 54, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dubreuil, L.; Jehl, F.; Cattoen, C.; Bonnet, R.; Bru, J.P.; Caron, F.; Cattoir, V.; Courvalin, P.; Jarlier, V.; Lina, G.; et al. Improvement of a disk diffusion method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. French recommendations revisited for 2020. Anaerobe 2020, 64, 102213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Jan, T.; Azmat, S.; Rahman, A.U.; Ilyas, S.; Mehmood, A. Experimental and DFT study of Al doped ZnO nanoparticles with enhanced antibacterial activity. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 20838–20847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Chennimalai, M.; Vijayalakshmi, V.; Senthil, T.; Sivakumar, N. One-step green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Opuntia humifusa fruit extract and their antibacterial activities. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 1842–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pauzi, N.; Zain, N.M.; Kutty, R.V.; Ramli, H. Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of ZnO nanoparticles synthesis using gum arabic as a potential new generation antibacterial agent. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ramesh, M.; Anbuvannan, M.; Viruthagiri, G. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Solanum nigrum leaf extract and their antibacterial activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 136, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Huang, Z.; Zheng, X.; Yan, D.; Yin, G.; Liao, X.; Kang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Huang, D.; Hao, B. Toxicological Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles Based on Bacteria. Langmuir 2008, 24, 4140–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Suresh, D.; Udayabhanu; Nethravathi, P.; Lingaraju, K.; Rajanaika, H.; Sharma, S.; Nagabhushana, H. EGCG assisted green synthesis of ZnO nanopowders: Photodegradative, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 136, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Roy, S.; Barua, N.; Buragohain, A.K.; Ahmed, G.A. Study of ZnO nanoparticles: Antibacterial property and light depolarization property using light scattering tool. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2013, 118, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ambika, S.; Sundrarajan, M. Antibacterial behaviour of Vitex negundo extract assisted ZnO nanoparticles against pathogenic bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 146, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gudkov, S.V.; Burmistrov, D.E.; Serov, D.A.; Rebezov, M.B.; Semenova, A.A.; Lisitsyn, A.B. A Mini Review of Antibacterial Properties of ZnO Nanoparticles. Front. Phys. 2021, 9, 641481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kairyte, K.; Kadys, A.; Luksiene, Z. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of photoactivated ZnO nanoparticles in suspension. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 128, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Raghupathi, K.R.; Koodali, R.T.; Manna, A.C. Size-Dependent Bacterial Growth Inhibition and Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4020–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jaber, G.S.; Khashan, K.S.; Abbas, M.J. Study the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesis by laser ablation in liquid. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 2668–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Rao, S.M.; Kotteeswaran, S.; Visagamani, A.M. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from camellia sinensis: Organic dye degradation and antibacterial activity. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 134, 108956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Nallal, V.U.; Prabha, K.; Muthupandi, S.; Razia, M. Synergistic antibacterial potential of plant-based zinc oxide nanoparticles in combination with antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mater. Proc. 2022, 49, 2632–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ng, Y.; Leung, Y.; Liu, F.; Ng, A.; Gao, M.; Chan, C.; Djurišić, A.; Leung, F.; Chan, W. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles under ambient illumination—The effect of nanoparticle properties. Thin Solid Films 2013, 542, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Weldegebrieal, G.K. Synthesis method, antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles for azo dyes in wastewater treatment: A review. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 120, 108140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Dyshlyuk, L.; Babich, O.; Ivanova, S.; Vasilchenco, N.; Prosekov, A.; Sukhikh, S. Suspensions of metal nanoparticles as a basis for protection of internal surfaces of building structures from biodegradation. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2019, 12, e00319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zudyte, B.; Luksiene, Z. Visible light-activated ZnO nanoparticles for microbial control of wheat crop. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2021, 219, 112206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Stanković, A.; Dimitrijević, S.; Uskoković, D. Influence of size scale and morphology on antibacterial properties of ZnO powders hydrothemally synthesized using different surface stabilizing agents. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2013, 102, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Premanathan, M.; Karthikeyan, K.; Jeyasubramanian, K.; Manivannan, G. Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward Gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation. Nanomed.-Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2011, 7, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Papavlassopoulos, H.; Mishra, Y.K.; Kaps, S.; Paulowicz, I.; Abdelaziz, R.; Elbahri, M.; Maser, E.; Adelung, R.; Röhl, C. Toxicity of Functional Nano-Micro Zinc Oxide Tetrapods: Impact of Cell Culture Conditions, Cellular Age and Material Properties. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Gupta, S.M.; Tripathi, M. A review of TiO2 nanoparticles. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56, 1639–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Yu, M.; Ma, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Liu, S. Sub-coherent growth of ZnO nanorod arrays on three-dimensional graphene framework as one-bulk high-performance photocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 390, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Bera, S.; Pal, M.; Naskar, A.; Jana, S. J Hierarchically structured ZnO-graphene hollow microspheres towards effective reusable adsorbent for organic pollutant via photodegradation process. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 669, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lakshmi Prasanna, V.; Vijayaraghavan, R. Insight into the mechanism of antibacterial activity of ZnO: Surface defects mediated reactive oxygen species even in the dark. Langmuir 2015, 31, 9155–9162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Pasquet, J.; Chevalier, Y.; Pelletier, J.; Couval, E.; Bouvier, D.; Bolzinger, M.-A.J.C.; Physicochemical, S.A.; Aspects, E. The contribution of zinc ions to the antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 457, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Song, W.; Zhang, J.; Guo, J.; Zhang, J.; Ding, F.; Li, L.; Sun, Z. Role of the dissolved zinc ion and reactive oxygen species in cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Toxicol. Lett. 2010, 199, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Povey, M.; York, D. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J. Nanopart. Res. 2007, 9, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sawai, J.; Shoji, S.; Igarashi, H.; Hashimoto, A.; Kokugan, T.; Shimizu, M.; Kojima, H. Hydrogen peroxide as an antibacterial factor in zinc oxide powder slurry. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998, 86, 521–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Stoimenov, P.K.; Klinger, R.L.; Marchin, G.L.; Klabunde, K. Metal oxide nanoparticles as bactericidal agents. Langmuir 2002, 18, 6679–6686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Choi, O.; Deng, K.K.; Kim, N.-J.; Ross Jr, L.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Hu, Z. The inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and silver chloride colloids on microbial growth. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3066–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Padmavathy, N.; Vijayaraghavan, R. Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles—An antimicrobial study. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 035004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Sharma, V.K.; Yngard, R.A.; Lin, Y. Silver nanoparticles: Green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 145, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Lok, C.-N.; Ho, C.-M.; Chen, R.; He, Q.-Y.; Yu, W.-Y.; Sun, H.; Tam, P.K.-H.; Chiu, J.-F.; Che, C.-M. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Rai, M.; Yadav, A.; Gade, A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Alabresm, A.; Decho, A.W.; Lead, J. A novel method to estimate cellular internalization of nanoparticles into gram-negative bacteria: Non-lytic removal of outer membrane and cell wall. Nanoimpact 2021, 21, 100283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Liu, L.; Xu, K.; Zhang, B.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, W. Cellular internalization and release of polystyrene microplastics and nanoplastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 779, 146523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhao, Z.; Yang, S.; Yang, P.; Lin, J.; Fan, J.; Zhang, B. Study of oxygen-deficient W18O49-based drug delivery system readily absorbed through cellular internalization pathways in tumor-targeted chemo-/photothermal therapy. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 136, 212772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Tam, K.H.; Djurišić, A.B.; Chan, C.M.N.; Xi, Y.Y.; Tse, C.W.; Leung, Y.H.; Chan, W.K.; Leung, F.C.C.; Au, D.W.T. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanorods prepared by a hydrothermal method. Thin Solid Film. 2008, 516, 6167–6174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sun, J.e.; Cai, S.; Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Xu, G. UV-irradiation induced biological activity and antibacterial activity of ZnO coated magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 114, 110997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Joe, A.; Park, S.-H.; Kim, D.-J.; Lee, Y.-J.; Jhee, K.-H.; Sohn, Y.; Jang, E.-S. Antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoplates and its Ag nanocomposites: Insight into an ROS-mediated antibacterial mechanism under UV light. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 267, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sroila, W.; Kantarak, E.; Kumpika, T.; Bovonsombut, S.; Thongmanee, P.; Singjai, P.; Thongsuwan, W. Antibacterial activity absence UV irradiation of Ag, TiO2 and ZnO NPs prepared by sparking method. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 17, 1569–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Ma, W.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Kim, I.S.; Ren, X. Tailored assembly of vinylbenzyl N-halamine with end-activated ZnO to form hybrid nanoparticles for quick antibacterial response and enhanced UV stability. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 797, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Nenavathu, B.P.; Kandula, S.; Verma, S. Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of safranin-T dye using functionalized graphene oxide nanosheet (FGS)/ZnO nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 19659–19667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Sudrajat, H.; Babel, S. A novel visible light active N-doped ZnO for photocatalytic degradation of dyes. J. Water Process Eng. 2017, 16, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Jin, Y.; Long, J.; Ma, X.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, H.; Long, J.; Wang, X. Synthesis of caged iodine-modified ZnO nanomaterials and study on their visible light photocatalytic antibacterial properties. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 256, 117873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Liang, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Zhou, R.; Ding, H. TiO2–ZnO/Au ternary heterojunction nanocomposite: Excellent antibacterial property and visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen production efficiency. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 2826–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Chen, L.; Chuang, Y.; Chen, C.-W.; Dong, C.-D. Facile synthesis of MoS2/ZnO quantum dots for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance and antibacterial applications. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2022, 30, 100873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Yang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Yang, R.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Yu, B. Insights into the mechanism of enhanced photocatalytic dye degradation and antibacterial activity over ternary ZnO/ZnSe/MoSe2 photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 539, 148220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Xin, Z.; Wang, S.; He, Q.; Han, X.; Fu, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhao, X. Preparation of a novel photocatalytic catalyst PW9@ZnO/Ag and the photocatalytic degradation of butyl xanthate under visible light. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Ye, W.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Xu, D.; Zhang, E.; Cheng, X.; Wan, Z.; Liu, C. The preparation of visible light-driven ZnO/Ag2MoO4/Ag nanocomposites with effective photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 891, 161898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Samuel, J.; Suresh, S.; Shabna, S.; Sherlin Vinita, V.; Joslin Ananth, N.; Shajin Shinu, P.M.; Mariappan, A.; simon, T.; Samson, Y.; Biju, C.S. Characterization and antibacterial activity of Ti doped ZnO nanorods prepared by hydrazine assisted wet chemical route. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2022, 143, 115374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Shkir, M.; Al-Shehri, B.M.; Pachamuthu, M.; Khan, A.; Chandekar, K.V.; AlFaify, S.; Hamdy, M.S. A remarkable improvement in photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles through Sr doping synthesized by one pot flash combustion technique for water treatments. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 587, 124340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Kumaran, N.N.; Muraleedharan, K. Photocatalytic activity of ZnO and Sr2+ doped ZnO nanoparticles. J. Water Process Eng. 2017, 17, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Okeke, I.; Agwu, K.; Ubachukwu, A.; Madiba, I.; Maaza, M.; Whyte, G.; Ezema, F. Impact of particle size and surface defects on antibacterial and photocatalytic activities of undoped and Mg-doped ZnO nanoparticles, biosynthesized using one-step simple process. Vacuum 2021, 187, 110110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Grace, A.N.; Pandian, K. Antibacterial efficacy of aminoglycosidic antibiotics protected gold nanoparticles—A brief study. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 297, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ma, Q.; Yang, X.; Lv, X.; Jia, H.; Wang, Y. Cu doped ZnO hierarchical nanostructures: Morphological evolution and photocatalytic property. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 2309–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kuriakose, S.; Satpati, B.; Mohapatra, S. Highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes by Cu doped ZnO nanostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 25172–25181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Chandramouli, K.; Suryanarayana, B.; Babu, T.A.; Raghavendra, V.; Parajuli, D.; Murali, N.; Malapati, V.; Mammo, T.W.; Shanmukhi, P.; Gudla, U.R.J.S.; et al. Synthesis, structural and antibacterial activity of pure, Fe doped, and glucose capped ZnO nanoparticles. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 26, 101327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Moussa, D.; Bakeer, D.E.-S.; Awad, R.; Abdel-Gaber, A. Physical properties of ZnO nanoparticles doped with Mn and Fe. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; p. 012021. [Google Scholar]
  194. Ahmad, M.; Ahmed, E.; Zafar, F.; Khalid, N.; Niaz, N.; Hafeez, A.; Ikram, M.; Khan, M.A.; Zhanglian, H. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Ce-doped ZnO nanopowders synthesized by combustion method. J. Rare Earths 2015, 33, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mohammadzadeh Kakhki, R.; Tayebee, R.; Ahsani, F. New and highly efficient Ag doped ZnO visible nano photocatalyst for removing of methylene blue. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 5941–5952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Raza, W.; Faisal, S.M.; Owais, M.; Bahnemann, D.; Muneer, M. Facile fabrication of highly efficient modified ZnO photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic, antibacterial and anticancer activity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 78335–78350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Weber, A.S.; Grady, A.M.; Koodali, R.T. Lanthanide modified semiconductor photocatalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Daksh, D.; Agrawal, Y.K. Rare earth-doped zinc oxide nanostructures: A review. Rev. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 5, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Mazierski, P.; Mikolajczyk, A.; Bajorowicz, B.; Malankowska, A.; Zaleska-Medynska, A.; Nadolna, J.J.A.C.B.E. The role of lanthanides in TiO2-based photocatalysis: A review. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2018, 233, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Verma, K.; Goyal, N.; Kotnala, R. Lattice defect-formulated ferromagnetism and UV photo-response in pure and Nd, Sm substituted ZnO thin films. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 12540–12554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Vakili, B.; Shahmoradi, B.; Maleki, A.; Safari, M.; Yang, J.; Pawar, R.R.; Lee, S.-M. Synthesis of immobilized cerium doped ZnO nanoparticles through the mild hydrothermal approach and their application in the photodegradation of synthetic wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 280, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Yuan, C.; Cui, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, F. Inhibition of the toxic byproduct during photocatalytic NO oxidation via La doping in ZnO. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Munawar, T.; Mukhtar, F.; Nadeem, M.S.; Riaz, M.; ur Rahman, M.N.; Mahmood, K.; Hasan, M.; Arshad, M.; Hussain, F.; Hussain, A. Novel photocatalyst and antibacterial agent; direct dual Z-scheme ZnO–CeO2-Yb2O3 heterostructured nanocomposite. Solid State Sci. 2020, 109, 106446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Gutha, Y.; Pathak, J.L.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, X. Antibacterial and wound healing properties of chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol)/zinc oxide beads (CS/PVA/ZnO). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Bai, H.; Liu, Z.; Sun, D.D. Hierarchical ZnO/Cu “corn-like” materials with high photodegradation and antibacterial capability under visible light. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 6205–6210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Sudheesh Kumar, P.; Lakshmanan, V.-K.; Anilkumar, T.; Ramya, C.; Reshmi, P.; Unnikrishnan, A.; Nair, S.V.; Jayakumar, R. Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2618–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Sudarshan, N.; Hoover, D.; Knorr, D. Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol. 1992, 6, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Tsai, G.-J.; Su, W.-H. Antibacterial activity of shrimp chitosan against Escherichia coli. J. Food Prot. 1999, 62, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Shin, Y.; Yoo, D.; Jang, J. Molecular weight effect on antimicrobial activity of chitosan treated cotton fabrics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80, 2495–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Fei Liu, X.; Lin Guan, Y.; Zhi Yang, D.; Li, Z.; De Yao, K. Antibacterial action of chitosan and carboxymethylated chitosan. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79, 1324–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FE-SEM micrographs of synthesized ZnO at different magnifications. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 1. FE-SEM micrographs of synthesized ZnO at different magnifications. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of sample A and sample B. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier GmbH.
Figure 2. SEM images of sample A and sample B. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier GmbH.
Applsci 12 07910 g002
Figure 3. Typical SEM images of synthesized ZnO nanostructures at different reaction pH values. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l.
Figure 3. Typical SEM images of synthesized ZnO nanostructures at different reaction pH values. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l.
Applsci 12 07910 g003
Figure 4. Typical XRD patterns of ZnO nanostructures synthesized with different reaction pH ((a) NaOH and (b) KOH as pH controlling agents, 7, 8, 10, 12 correspond to their respective concentrations). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd. and Techna Group S.r.l.
Figure 4. Typical XRD patterns of ZnO nanostructures synthesized with different reaction pH ((a) NaOH and (b) KOH as pH controlling agents, 7, 8, 10, 12 correspond to their respective concentrations). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd. and Techna Group S.r.l.
Applsci 12 07910 g004
Figure 5. Electron microscope image of ZnO nanoparticles: the concentration of precursor is (a) 5 mM, (b) 10 mM, and (c) 20 mM. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [72]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 5. Electron microscope image of ZnO nanoparticles: the concentration of precursor is (a) 5 mM, (b) 10 mM, and (c) 20 mM. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [72]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Applsci 12 07910 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of ZnO samples synthesized with different precursor concentrations. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [72]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of ZnO samples synthesized with different precursor concentrations. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [72]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Applsci 12 07910 g006
Figure 7. Schematic representation of microbial contamination sources and their various nanomaterials for water treatment. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [76]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of microbial contamination sources and their various nanomaterials for water treatment. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [76]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Applsci 12 07910 g007
Figure 8. Bacterial growth curve of E. coli under different ZnO-NFs concentrations.
Figure 8. Bacterial growth curve of E. coli under different ZnO-NFs concentrations.
Applsci 12 07910 g008
Figure 9. Basic mechanism of ZnO photocatalysis. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 9. Basic mechanism of ZnO photocatalysis. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g009
Figure 10. TEM images of (a) untreated E. coli cells, (b) treated with ZnO nanoparticles, and (c) treated with Zn2+ ions solution in ultrapure water. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright © 2022, American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. TEM images of (a) untreated E. coli cells, (b) treated with ZnO nanoparticles, and (c) treated with Zn2+ ions solution in ultrapure water. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright © 2022, American Chemical Society.
Applsci 12 07910 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of cell damage to G+ bacteria by Zn2+ ions. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of cell damage to G+ bacteria by Zn2+ ions. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g011
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of the damage to bacterial cells caused by ZnO nanomaterials producing H2O2. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of the damage to bacterial cells caused by ZnO nanomaterials producing H2O2. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g012
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the physical action of ZnO nanomaterials for sterilization. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the physical action of ZnO nanomaterials for sterilization. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g013
Figure 14. TEM images of B. atrophaeus (a) control, (b) ZnO powders, (c) ZnO nanorods, and (d) ZnO nanoparticles. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [172]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 14. TEM images of B. atrophaeus (a) control, (b) ZnO powders, (c) ZnO nanorods, and (d) ZnO nanoparticles. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [172]. Copyright © 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g014
Figure 15. (ac) Diameter of inhibition zones of Zn1−xMgxO against bacteria pathogen. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [188]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 15. (ac) Diameter of inhibition zones of Zn1−xMgxO against bacteria pathogen. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [188]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Applsci 12 07910 g015
Figure 16. TEM images of (a) pure, (b) Fe doped, and (c) capped ZnO nanoparticles. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [192]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 16. TEM images of (a) pure, (b) Fe doped, and (c) capped ZnO nanoparticles. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [192]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g016
Figure 17. XRD patterns of various ZnO-based nanomaterials. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [192]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 17. XRD patterns of various ZnO-based nanomaterials. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [192]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g017
Figure 18. XRD patterns of ZnO, Ag2MoO4/Ag, ZA, and ZAA nanocomposite with different proportions. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [184]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 18. XRD patterns of ZnO, Ag2MoO4/Ag, ZA, and ZAA nanocomposite with different proportions. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [184]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g018
Figure 19. Photographs of antibacterial test results of ZnO, Ag2MoO4/Ag, and ZAA samples against Escherichia coli (ac) and Staphylococcus aureus (df). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [184]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 19. Photographs of antibacterial test results of ZnO, Ag2MoO4/Ag, and ZAA samples against Escherichia coli (ac) and Staphylococcus aureus (df). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [184]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g019
Figure 20. Antibacterial effect of ZnO-CeO2-Yb2O3 nanocomposites: (a) gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, (b) gram-negative Escherichia coli bacteria at different concentrations, and (c,d) Standard antibiotics Ciprofloxacin against S. aureus and E. coli. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [203]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier Masson SAS.
Figure 20. Antibacterial effect of ZnO-CeO2-Yb2O3 nanocomposites: (a) gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, (b) gram-negative Escherichia coli bacteria at different concentrations, and (c,d) Standard antibiotics Ciprofloxacin against S. aureus and E. coli. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [203]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier Masson SAS.
Applsci 12 07910 g020
Figure 21. Comparison of the zone of inhibition (ZOI) against different species of bacteria (a,b), mechanism of antibacterial activity of ZnO–CeO2-Yb2O3 nanocomposite (c). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [203]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier Masson SAS.
Figure 21. Comparison of the zone of inhibition (ZOI) against different species of bacteria (a,b), mechanism of antibacterial activity of ZnO–CeO2-Yb2O3 nanocomposite (c). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [203]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier Masson SAS.
Applsci 12 07910 g021
Figure 22. SEM images of various prepared CS/PVA/ZnO-related materials and precursors: (A) pure chitosan, (B) ZnO, and (C) CS/PVA/ZnO. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [204]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 22. SEM images of various prepared CS/PVA/ZnO-related materials and precursors: (A) pure chitosan, (B) ZnO, and (C) CS/PVA/ZnO. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [204]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g022
Figure 23. The antibacterial activities of CS, CS/PVA, and CS/PVA/ZnO: (A) Diameter of zone of inhibition on E. coli culture (gram negative bacteria); (B) Effect of mammalian cell viability of freshly prepared CS, CS/PVA, and CS/PVA/ZnO on MG63 (human osteosarcoma cell line) and (C) MCF7 (Human breast cancer cell line) cells. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [204]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 23. The antibacterial activities of CS, CS/PVA, and CS/PVA/ZnO: (A) Diameter of zone of inhibition on E. coli culture (gram negative bacteria); (B) Effect of mammalian cell viability of freshly prepared CS, CS/PVA, and CS/PVA/ZnO on MG63 (human osteosarcoma cell line) and (C) MCF7 (Human breast cancer cell line) cells. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [204]. Copyright© 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Applsci 12 07910 g023
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of different antibacterial synthesis methods.
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of different antibacterial synthesis methods.
MethodPreparation ShapeAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
Sol–gelNanorods;
Nanotubes;
Nanobelts;
Nano springs;
Nano spirals;
Nano rings.
(1) Uniform doping;
(2) High stability;
(3) Low synthesis temperature.
(1) Expensive raw material prices;
(2) Longer reaction time;
(3) Organics escape.
[32,33,34]
Co-precipitationHomogeneous
and spherical;
Nanobelts;
Nano springs.
(1) Simple preparation process;
(2) Low cost;
(3) Short synthesis cycle.
(1) Additional precipitant;
(2) High temperature calcination;
(3) Uneven dispersion.
[35,36]
Microwaves-assistedNanorods;
Nanotubes;
Nanobelts;
Nano springs.
(1) High synthesis efficiency;
(2) Energy saving;
(3) Improved material properties.
(1) Indeterminate form;
(2) Large investment;
(3) High requirements for equipment.
[37,38,39]
HydrothermalNanobelts;
Nano springs;
Nano spirals.
(1) Less thermal stress;
(2) High particle purity;
(3) Controllable crystal shape;
(4) Low cost.
(1) Inconvenient to observe;
(2) Not intuitive;
(3) High equipment requirements;
(4) Technical difficulty;
(5) Poor safety performance.
[40,41,42]
Table 2. Various kinds of adsorbents for microbial removal in different water resources.
Table 2. Various kinds of adsorbents for microbial removal in different water resources.
Water TypeSample TypeMicrobial Pollution TargetTypes of AdsorbentsReferences
sDrinking waterDomestic drinking waterBacteria; virus; protozoan;Activated carbon;[110]
Carbon-graphene;[111]
Nano adsorbent;[112]
Microbial contaminants.Carbon-graphene.[113]
Drinking water sourceBiological contaminants;Nano adsorbent;[114]
Microbial contaminants;Iron Oxide Nanoparticles;[115]
E. coli.Mixed matrix.[116]
WastewaterLake wastewaterPathogenic microorganisms.Zinc oxide; Iron oxide; Silver oxide nanoparticles.[117,118]
Domestic wastewaterAntibiotics;Biochar; [119]
Pathogenic microorganism;Activated carbon;[120]
V. fischeri, B. subtilis, E. coli;Carbon nanotube;[121]
Pathogenic microorganism.Copper oxide; Zinc oxide; Silver oxide; Titanium oxide.[122,123]
Industrial wastewaterPathogenic microorganisms;Graphene oxide nanosheets; Silver nanoparticles;[124]
Virus.Carbon nanotubes; TiO2.[125]
Laboratory waterLaboratory simulated waterEnterobacter, Citrobacter, Hafnia;Biochar stabilized; Iron oxide; Copper oxide nanoparticles;[126]
Klebsiella, Escherichia;Fe3O4; SnO2; NiO;
PAN/boehmite nanofibers.
[127]
S. aureus, E. coli;Electro spun; Nanofibers;[128]
Bacteria; virus.Silver @ Eggshell;
Nanocomposite.
[83,129]
Laboratory pure waterS. aureus, E. coli, C. albicans;Ag nano-embedded pebbles; Nano cellulose;[85]
E. coli.Nanofibers; Granular activated carbon;[130,131]
Graphite flake.[132]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xin, Z.; He, Q.; Wang, S.; Han, X.; Fu, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhao, X. Recent Progress in ZnO-Based Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Antimicrobial in Water Treatment: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7910. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157910

AMA Style

Xin Z, He Q, Wang S, Han X, Fu Z, Xu X, Zhao X. Recent Progress in ZnO-Based Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Antimicrobial in Water Treatment: A Review. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(15):7910. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xin, Ziming, Qianqian He, Shuangao Wang, Xiaoyu Han, Zhongtian Fu, Xinxin Xu, and Xin Zhao. 2022. "Recent Progress in ZnO-Based Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Antimicrobial in Water Treatment: A Review" Applied Sciences 12, no. 15: 7910. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop