Next Article in Journal
Underwater Image Restoration Method Based on Multi-Frame Image under Artificial Light Source
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Trajectory Prediction for Oil Tankers via Grid-Based Clustering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complete Mitochondrial DNA Genomes of Deep-Sea Eels Synaphobranchus brevidorsalis and S. affinis and New Record of S. brevidorsalis from the East Mariana Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

First Data on the Age and Growth of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti (Moridae) from Waters of the Emperor Seamounts (Northwestern Pacific)

by
Nikolai B. Korostelev
1,
Igor V. Maltsev
2 and
Alexei M. Orlov
3,4,5,*
1
Laboratory of Ecology of Lower Vertebrates, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia
2
Marine Research Department, Pacific Branch of the Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, 690091 Vladivostok, Russia
3
Laboratory of Oceanic Ichthyofauna, Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117218 Moscow, Russia
4
Department of Ichthyology and Hydrobiology, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
5
Laboratory of Behavior of Lower Vertebrates, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(6), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061212
Submission received: 25 May 2023 / Revised: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 9 June 2023 / Published: 11 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep-Sea Fish and Fisheries)

Abstract

:
This study presents the first data of growth and age of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti, a rare and poorly studied member of the Moridae family (Gadiformes, Teleostei). The research was focused on the Emperor Seamounts area with the aim of investigating the age, growth rates, and longevity of this species. The analysis involved examining annual growth increments on sagittal otoliths. Data were taken from longline catches in 2014 and 2016, resulting in the collection of 140 individuals and the use of 70 otoliths for age determination. The results revealed that Schmidt’s cod can live for up to 49 years, with a mean age of 31.5 years in the catches. The relationship between body weight and total length was described by a power function, indicating positive allometric growth. The most suitable growth model for this species was determined to be the Von Bertalanffy growth equation. These results provide valuable insights to add to the limited knowledge of growth and age in the Moridae family and emphasize the long lifespan and slow growth of Schmidt’s cod.

1. Introduction

Since the development of deep-sea fishing and increased research on deep-sea fish, it has been hypothesized that the most demersal fish species exhibit slow growth and long lifespans. However, specific age estimates have remained controversial for many years due to difficulties in interpreting age determinations [1,2,3]. Researchers have not reached a consensus on the regularity of ring formation on fish hard structures under conditions of large-scale temporal and spatial homogeneity of environmental factors at depths exceeding 500 m, which implies significant stability in deep-sea ecosystems [4]. By now, it has been demonstrated that calcified structures of deep-sea fish show annual growth increments. This has been evidenced by limited studies involving tagging and recapture of deep-sea fish, particularly sablefish Anoplopoma fimbria [5,6], as well as more extensive studies comparing the number of zones in otolith cross-sections with radiometric age estimates based on the Pb-210/Ra-226 isotopes ratio [1,3,7,8,9]. These comparisons have helped optimize the methodology for counting annual rings on otoliths, enabling the acquisition of reliable age data, even for long-lived fish species, using current otolith preparation and growth increment counting methods [6,10].
The family Moridae (order Gadiformes) includes 18–19 genera and over 100 species, six of which have been described in the past decade [11,12,13]. Lepidion is one of the oldest genera in the family with fossil representatives recorded from the Middle Miocene (11.6–16.0 Ma) [12,14,15,16], and is represented by nine valid species that live in deep waters over the continental slopes and seamounts around the world [12,14,15,16]. Schmidt’s cod, L. schmidti (Figure 1A), is a rare and poorly studied member of the genus [12,13], found in the North Atlantic, southwestern Indian Ocean, and northern and southwestern Pacific [16,17,18,19]. On the Emperor Seamounts, it is found alongside its congener, L. inosimae [14,15]. Schmidt’s cod lives at depths of 375–2404 m, with an optimal habitat range of 900–1200 m [20]; it does not form dense concentrations and has no commercial value [11,21].
Lepidion schmidti has been poorly studied, and there are currently no publications documenting age and growth of this species. Although there are over 100 species in this family, data on age and growth have only been published for a few, including the common mora Mora moro [22,23], longfin codling Laemonema longipes [24], red cod Pseudophycis bacchus [25,26,27], blue antimora Antimora rostrata [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], and Pacific flatnose A. microlepis [36,37,38]. Among the nine valid species in the genus Lepidion, information on growth and age is available for the North Atlantic codling L. eques only [33].
The objective of this study is to provide the first data on the growth and age of L. schmidti from the Emperor Seamounts area based on the analysis of growth increments on sagittal otoliths.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is based on the materials from the catches of Lepidion schmidti during the longline commercial fishery off the Emperor Seamounts (Figure 2) on board the commercial longliner “Palmer” (owned by LLC “Yuzhny Krest”, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia) in May–July of 2014 and 2016 at depths ranging from 401 to 1062 m. The fishing was conducted at seamounts: Koko, Lira, Ojin, Nintoku, Jingu, Kammu, T363 + A. L. schmidti was only caught sporadically in 2014 off Jingu and Ojin seamounts, while in 2016 it was caught only off Koko Seamount (24.7 individuals per 1000 hooks) and Lira Seamount (6.8 individuals per 1000 hooks). The fishing was done using Mustad (Gjøvik, Norway) bottom longlines (No. 14 hooks), with Pacific squid (Todarodes pacificus) and Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) used as bait at 1:1 ratio. A total of 140 individuals were collected and subjected to biological analysis on board the vessel using standard methods [39]. Due to technical reasons, otoliths (sagittae) (Figure 1B,C) for age determination were collected from 70 individuals. Only one pair exhibited a weakly calcified otolith with a modified shape, while the remaining otoliths had a shape as described in the literature [40].
Two species of the genus Lepidion inhabit the Emperor Seamount Chain area, namely, L. enosimae and L. schmidti [16,41]. During the fieldwork period, significant attention was paid to accurate species identification of the fish captured. Information from various sources [15,17,19,21,41] was used for species identification, taking into account distinct external morphological features of both species.
The age of L. schmidti was determined using a method specifically developed for some long-lived deep-water fish species [6,10]. This method has been successfully used to determine the age of other members of the Moridae family, such as Antimora spp. [30,31,32,34,35,37,38,42]. The otoliths were sectioned to the center, then heated in the flame of an alcohol burner, and polished on abrasive disks with aluminum-oxide or silicon-carbide coating with a grain size of 0.1–0.9 μm (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA). Age was determined by counting annual rings on photographs of polished otolith cross-sections (Figure 3) using Adobe Photoshop CS6 ver. 13.0 × 64 software (Adobe System, San Jose, CA, USA). The sections were photographed in glycerin under a Motic SMZ-143 microscope camera (Motic, Hong Kong, China) at magnifications of ×2–8, depending on the size of the otolith.
The differences in TL, body weight, and age values of males and females were tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. The test results showed that TL and body weight do not follow a normal distribution, while the age was normally distributed. Thus, the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare TL and body weight, and the Student’s t-test was used to compare age of males and females.
Based on the obtained age and length data, a size–age key was constructed [43], which was used to estimate the age composition of the entire catch. To describe the growth of the studied species, the most suitable function was chosen using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) [44], comparing linear, power, and logistic functions, Gompertz curve, and Von Bertalanffy growth equation (VBGE). The mean specific rate of linear growth was estimated using the formula [45,46]:
C = L n L n + 1 L n ( L n ) t n + 1 t n , where L n + 1   a n d   L n are the mean lengths of fish at the ages of t n + 1 and t n respectively.
Statistical analysis of the results was performed using MS Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, DC, USA) and PAST version 3.14 software [47].

3. Results and Discussion

Due to the selectivity of the longline fishing gear, the catch was dominated by large fish with a TL ranging from 40 to 112 cm, and an average of 60.7 ± 0.9 cm. The most abundant individuals in the catch had a body length of 56 to 65 cm, while smaller fish (<46 cm) and longer fish (>70 cm) were rare (Figure 4). Males and females had different body length ranges and mean lengths, with males ranging from 43.5 to 85.0 cm (mean 59.0 ± 1.2 cm) and females ranging from 42.0 to 112.0 cm (mean 61.3 ± 1.3 cm). However, no statistical differences were found between TL of males and females in the catches (U = 2009; Z = 0.7875; p = 0.431)
The body weight of L. schmidti in the catches ranged from 0.5 to 14.7 kg, with mean 1.8 ± 0.1 kg. Most individuals in the catch (76.5%) had a body weight ranging 0.5 to 2.0 kg, while fish weighing 2.0 to 2.5 kg composed 12.1% of the catches, and the other size groups were represented by single individuals only (Figure 5). Meanwhile, the maximum and mean body weight in the catches were larger in females compared to males, ranging from 0.5 to 14.7 kg (mean 1.9 ± 0.2 kg) and 0.5 to 4.4 kg (mean 1.5 ± 0.1 kg), respectively, but no statistical differences were found between body weight of males and females in the catches (U = 1915.5; Z = 1.2091; p = 0.227).
The proportion of males in the catches was 41.8% of the total number of fish, while females accounted for 58.2%, and immature individuals were not recorded.
The relationship (LWR) between body weight (W, g) and total length (TL, mm) of L. schmidti is well described by a power function: W = 1.8 × 10−6 TL3.323 (R2 = 0.93) for the total sample; W = 2.2 × 10−6 TL3.333 (R2 = 0.96) for males; and W = 1.3 × 10−6 TL3.390 (R2 = 0.94) for females (Figure 6). In all cases, the value of the power coefficient b in the LWR equation exceeds 3, which may indicate positive allometric growth of the species in the studied area [48]. No differences were found between LWR parameters of males and females in the catches due to the absence of statistical differences in the TL and the body weight between both sexes. In the literature, this relationship for the species considered is given only for trawl catches from New Zealand waters and is described by the equation W = 4.6 × 10−3 TL3.218 [49]. The power coefficient b is close to that for our sample, while the values of linear coefficient a differ significantly, which is most likely due to the different size range of fish in the samples.
The age of L. schmidti in our samples varied from 22 to 49 years, with a mean age of 31.5 ± 0.7 years. The minimum, maximum, and mean age values of males and females were quite similar. Thus, the age of males ranged from 22 to 41 years with a mean value of 31.9 ± 0.9 years, while for females these values were 22–49 years and 31.3 ± 1.0 years, respectively. There were no statistical differences in the age of males and females in the study sample (t = 0.39036, p = 0.697). Therefore, the longevity of L. schmidti is much longer than what is known from the literature for its congener, L. eques, which has a maximum age of 13 years corresponding to the total length of 33.2 cm [33]. For other representatives of the genus, the data on lifespan and growth are lacking in the literature. However, among representatives of the Moridae family, long-lived species are known, such as Antimora spp. and common mora Mora moro [22,29,32,50].
The comparison of AIC values indicates that both VBGE and the linear function provide the best fit for describing fish growth in the sample, although VBGE values are slightly higher (Table 1). The high AIC values obtained for the linear function and the significantly overestimated L values (Table 2), which represent the asymptotic length of the fish, are likely attributed to the absence of small fish in the samples and a poorly pronounced deceleration of growth in large mature individuals (Figure 7). Similar overestimations of L values have been observed in studies of the age of other morids [28,30,31]. The specific growth rates of the studied species between 30 and 45 years of age remain relatively constant (Figure 8). The observed increase in growth rate after 45 years is probably an artifact resulting from the small number of largest fish in the samples and warrants further investigation. It should be noted that previous studies describing growth of morids have used the VBGE without comparing it to results obtained using other functions [23,24,27].
The growth curves of males and females in the examined samples are nearly identical (Figure 7), and the difference in L values in the VBGE (Table 2) can be attributed to the larger maximum size and age of the females. However, due to the limited number of largest fish, it is challenging to assess the disparities in maximum size and age between individuals of different sexes.
The analysis of the age structure of catches (Figure 9), determined via the size–age key using selected age estimations, showed that the most abundant age groups were individuals aged 32 and 34, each comprising 10% of the total catch. No fish younger than 22 years were found in the catches, while individuals aged 22 accounted for slightly less than 6% of the catch. Fish older than 39 years were only sporadically encountered in the catches.

4. Conclusions

Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti is a long-lived and slow-growing deep-water bentho-pelagic fish. To provide a more detailed description of its growth characteristics, an analysis of otoliths from individuals younger than 22 years and older than 40 years is necessary. The capture of large L. schmidti individuals from an already rare species through longline fishing can have a negative impact on the condition of the population, as long-lived deep-water fish species are highly vulnerable to fishing pressure due to their biological characteristics such as long lifespan, slow growth rates, and low reproductive capacity [1,51,52,53,54].
According to the literature, the lifespan of morids can vary greatly. For example, Pseudophycis bachus has a maximum known age of 5 years [25,26,27] and can be considered a species with a short lifespan. Lepidion eques, Laemonema longipes, and Physiculus cyanostrophus have showed maximum lifespans of 13, 17, and 18 years, respectively [23,24,55], and can be classified as species with a moderate lifespan. Antimora spp. and common mora Mora moro are considered long-lived species [22,29,32]. Our data on the growth of L. schmidti also indicate that this species belongs to the group of long-lived morids.
There are indications in the literature that within a same taxonomic group, the metabolic rate might decrease, resulting in slowed growth and increased lifespan for deep-water species. Some authors explain this phenomenon as a result of the extreme conditions of the deep-sea affecting their metabolism [56,57,58]. However, it has been shown for many species that low temperatures, oxygen deficiency, and other environmental factors in mesopelagic fish are compensated by the organisms and do not affect the metabolic rate and growth rate [59,60,61,62,63,64]. The slow metabolism, slow growth rates, and longer lifespan are adaptations to the deep-sea environment, which can be partially explained by the „visual interactions hypothesis,” which states that the metabolic rate decreases with decreasing animal locomotor activity [65,66,67,68,69,70]. Undoubtedly, further research is needed to confirm this theory with an example of morids. However, the fact that P. bachus occurs at depths ranging from 5 to 700 m and has a significantly shorter life cycle than the deeper Antimora spp., M. moro, and L. schmidti may indicate the influence of the deep-sea environment on slowed growth rates and increased lifespan in morid fish.
It is also important to highlight the significance of validating age determinations in deep-water fish. Among all morids, age determination using otoliths has been confirmed by radiometric methods for M. moro only [71], and the correlation between the number of rings on vertebrae and otoliths has been shown for Pacific flatnose Antimora microlepis [42]. Therefore, to obtain a comprehensive understanding of L. schmidti growth, it is necessary to analyze otoliths from age groups not covered in this study (younger than 22 years and older than 40 years) and validate age determinations via radiometric methods. This, along with studying the growth and age of other morid species, can become a promising topic for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B.K. and A.M.O.; methodology, N.B.K. and A.M.O.; software, N.B.K.; formal analysis, N.B.K.; resources, I.V.M. and A.M.O.; data curation, N.B.K., I.V.M. and A.M.O.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B.K. and A.M.O.; writing—review and editing, N.B.K., I.V.M. and A.M.O.; supervision, A.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received financial support from the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 23-24-00230, https://rscf.ru/project/23-24-00230/, accessed on 23 May 2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Alexey Baitaliuk (Pacific Branch of the Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Vladivostok, Russia) for the opportunity to sample and analyze otoliths of L. schmidti. They also thank the crew of the commercial longliner “Palmer” for their assistance in collecting the data used in this study. The authors are thankful to three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions that allowed for considerable improvement of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Cailliet, G.M.; Andrews, A.H.; Burton, E.J.; Watters, D.L.; Kline, D.E.; Ferry-Graham, L.A. Age Determination and Validation Studies of Marine Fishes: Do Deep-Dwellers Live Longer? Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36, 739–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Munk, K.M. Maximum ages of groundfishes in waters off Alaska and British Columbia and considerations of age determination. Alsk. Fish. Res. Bull. 2001, 8, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, A.H.; Cailliet, G.M.; Coale, K.H.; Munk, K.M.; Mahoney, M.M.; O’Connell, V.M. Radiometric Age Validation of the Yelloweye Rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) from Southeastern Alaska. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 2002, 53, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gage, J.D.; Tyler, P.A. Deep-Sea Biology: A Natural History of Organisms at the Deep-Sea Floor; Cambridge University Press: Oxford, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beamish, R.; McFarlane, G. Reevaluation of the Interpretation of Annuli from Otoliths of a Long-Lived Fish, Anoplopoma fimbria. Fish. Res. 2000, 46, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beamish, R.J.; Chilton, D.E. Preliminary Evaluation of a Method to Determine the Age of Sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1982, 39, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smith, J.N.; Nelson, R.; Campana, S.E. The Use of Pb-210/Ra-226 and Th-228/Ra-228 Dis-Equilibria in the Ageing of Otoliths of Marine Fish. In Radionuclides in the Study of Marine Processes; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 350–359. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kastelle, C.R.; Kimura, D.K.; Nevissi, A.E.; Gunderson, D.R. Using Pb-210/Ra-226 Disequilibria for Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, Age Validation. Fish. Bull. 1994, 92, 292–301. [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrews, A.H.; Tracey, D.M.; Dunn, M.R. Lead-Radium Dating of Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus): Validation of a Centenarian Life Span. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009, 66, 1130–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mendoza, R.P. Otoliths and Their Applications in Fishery Science. Ribarstvo 2006, 64, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alcorn, D.; Stone, R. First Records of the Genus Lepidion (Gadiformes: Moridae) from Alaska. Northwest. Nat. 2012, 93, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bañón, R.; Arronte, J.C.; Vázquez-Dorado, S.; Del Río, J.L.; de Carlos, A. DNA barcoding of the genus Lepidion (Gadiformes: Moridae) with recognition of Lepidion eques as a junior synonym of Lepidion lepidion. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2013, 13, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; Van der Laan, R. (Eds.) Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. 2023. Available online: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (accessed on 23 May 2023).
  14. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. (Eds.) FishBase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. 2023. Version (02/2023). Available online: www.fishbase.org (accessed on 23 May 2023).
  15. Okamoto, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Asahida, T. Descriptive Morphology of Pelagic Juvenile of Lepidion inosimae (Gadiformes: Moridae) Collected from off Northeastern Japan. Ichthyol. Res. 2009, 56, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Paulin, C.D. First Record of Lepidion inosimae (Günther) and L. schmidti Svetovidov (Pisces: Moridae) from New Zealand. N. Z. J. Zool. 1984, 11, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arronte, J.C.; Bañón, R.; Quigley, D.T.G.; Pis-Millán, J.A.; Heredia, J. New Data on Lepidion schmidti (Gadiformes: Moridae) from the North-East Atlantic Ocean. J. Fish. Biol. 2011, 79, 1708–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Porteiro, F.M.; Sutton, T.T.; Byrkjedal, I.; Orlov, A.M.; Heino, M.; Menezes, G.; Bergstad, O.A. Fishes of the Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge Collected during the MAR-ECO Cruise in June–July 2004: An Annotated Checklist. Arquepilago Mar. Life Sci. 2017, 10, 1–126. [Google Scholar]
  19. Templeman, W. A Review of the Morid Fish Genus Lepidion of the North Atlantic with First Records of Lepidion eques from the Western North Atlantic. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1970, 27, 457–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orlov, A.M.; Tokranov, A.M. Checklist of Deep-Sea Fishes of the Russian Northwestern Pacific Ocean Found at Depths below 1000 m. Progr. Oceanogr. 2019, 176, 102143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hoff, G.R.; Stevenson, D.E.; Orr, J.W. Guide to the Gadiform Fishes of the Eastern North Pacific. NOAA Technol. Memo. NMFS-AFSC 2015, 309, 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vieira, A.R.; Figueiredo, I.; Figueiredo, C.; Menezes, G.M. Age and Growth of Two Deep-Water Fish Species in the Azores Archipelago: Mora moro (Risso, 1810) and Epigonus telescopus (Risso, 1810). Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2013, 98, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Santos, R.; Medeiros-Leal, W.; Crespo, O.; Novoa-Pabon, A.; Pinho, M. Contributions to Management Strategies in the NE Atlantic Regarding the Life History and Population Structure of a Key Deep-Sea Fish (Mora moro). Biology 2021, 10, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Savin, A.B. Biology of the Longfin Codling (Laemonema longipes, Moridae) from the Northwestern Part of Pacific Ocean. Izv. TINRO 1998, 124, 108–138. [Google Scholar]
  25. Habib, G. Aspects of the Biology of the Red Cod Pseudophycis Bacchus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  26. Horn, P.L. Age and Growth of Red Cod (Pseudophycis bachus) off the South-East Coast of South Island. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1996, 30, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Horn, P.L. An Ageing Methodology, and Growth Parameters for Red Cod (Pseudophycis bachus) off the Southeast Coast of the South Island; New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Wellington, New Zealand, 1995.
  28. Fossen, I.; Bergstad, O.A. Distribution and Biology of Blue Hake, Antimora rostrata (Pisces: Moridae), along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and off Greenland. Fish. Res. 2006, 82, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Horn, P.L.; Sutton, C.P. An Assessment of Age and Growth of Violet Cod (Antimora rostrata) in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 2015, 38, 1553–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Korostelev, N.B.; Bañón, R.; Orlov, A.M. Age and Growth of Blue Antimora Antimora rostrata (Moridae) in Waters off Flemish Cap (North-Western Atlantic). J. Ichthyol. 2022, 62, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Korostelev, N.B.; Vedishcheva, E.V.; Orlov, A.M. Age and Growth of Antimora rostrata (Moridae, Gadiformes, Teleostei) from the Kerguelen and Crozet Islands in the Southern Indian Ocean. Polar Rec. 2019, 55, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Korostelev, N.B.; Welsford, D.C.; Belyakov, V.V.; Bush, A.G.; Orlov, A.M. So Close Yet So Far: Age and Growth of Blue Antimora Antimora rostrata ( Moridae, Gadiformes, Teleostei ) off New Zealand and Macquarie Island (Southwestern Pacific Ocean). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Magnússon, J. V Distribution and Some Other Biological Parameters of Two Morid Species Lepidion eques (Günther, 1887) and Antimora rostrata (Günther, 1878) in Icelandic Waters. Fish. Res. 2001, 51, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vedishcheva, E.V.; Korostelev, N.B.; Gordeev, I.I.; Orlov, A.M. A First Attempt to Evaluate the Age and Growth of Blue Hake Antimora rostrata (Moridae, Gadiformes, Teleostei) from the Lazarev and Weddell Seas (Antarctic). Polar Rec. 2019, 55, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Orlov, A.M.; Vedishcheva, E.V.; Trofimova, A.O.; Orlova, S.Y. Age and Growth of Blue Antimora Antimora rostrata (Moridae) in Southwestern Greenland Waters. J. Ichthyol. 2018, 58, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frey, P.H.; Keller, A.A.; Simon, V. Dynamic Population Trends Observed in the Deep-Living Pacific Flatnose, Antimora microlepis, on the U.S. West Coast. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2017, 122, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Korostelev, N.B.; Baytalyuk, A.A.; Maltsev, I.V.; Orlov, A.M. First Data on the Age and Growth in Pacific Flatnose Antimora microlepis (Moridae) from the Waters of the Underwater Emperor Mountain Range (Northwestern Pacific). J. Ichthyol. 2020, 60, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Orlov, A.M.; Abramov, A.A. New Data on Pacific Flatnose, Antimora microlepis (Moridae) from the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. In Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey, Honolulu, HI, USA, 5–8 November 2001; Volume 2, pp. 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pravdin, I.F. Guidelines to Studies of Fishes; Pishchevaya Promyshlennost: Moscow, Russia, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwarzhans, W. A Comparative Morphological Study of Recent Otoliths of the Moridae (Gadiformes). Mem. Della Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Stor. Nat. Milano 2019, 46, 355–370. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nakaya, K.; Amaoka, K.; Abe, K. A Review of the Genus Lepidion (Gadiformes, Moridae) from the Northwestern Pacific. Jpn. J. Jchthyol. 1980, 27, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  42. Korostelev, N.B.; Frey, P.H.; Orlov, A.M. Using Different Hard Structures to Estimate the Age of Deep-Sea Fishes: A Case Study of the Pacific Flatnose, Antimora microlepis (Moridae, Gadiformes, Teleostei). Fish. Res. 2020, 232, 105731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Morozov, A.V. Methodology for collecting and processing ichthyological materials. Ryb. Khoz-Vo Turkmenist./Tr. NIIRH 1929, 5, 172–189. [Google Scholar]
  44. Katsanevakis, S.; Maravelias, C.D. Modelling Fish Growth: Multi-Model Inference as a Better Alternative to a Priori Using von Bertalanffy Equation. Fish Fish. 2008, 9, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mina, M.V.; Klevezal, G.A. Growth of the Animals; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alimov, A.F. Introduction into Production Hydrobiology; Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 178. [Google Scholar]
  48. Froese, R. Cube Law, Condition Factor and Weight-Length Relationships: History, Meta-Analysis and Recommendations. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2006, 22, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. O’Driscoll, R.L.; Bagley, N.W. Trawl Survey of Middle Depth Species in the Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas, November–December 2008 (TAN0813); New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2009/56; Ministry of Fisheries: Wellington, New Zealand, 2009.
  50. Orlov, A.M.; Abramov, A.A. New Data on Flat-Nosed Hake Antimora microlepis (Moridae) from the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. J. Ichthyol. 2002, 42, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  51. Allain, V.; Lorance, P. Age Estimation and Growth of Some Deep-Sea Fish from the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. Cybium 2000, 24, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  52. Roberts, C.M. Deep Impact: The Rising Toll of Fishing in the Deep Sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Devine, J.A.; Baker, K.D.; Haedrich, R.L. Deep-Sea Fishes Qualify as Endangered. Nature 2006, 439, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bergstad, O.A. North Atlantic Demersal Deep-Water Fish Distribution and Biology: Present Knowledge and Challenges for the Future. J. Fish Biol. 2013, 83, 1489–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Triay-Portella, R.; González, J.A.; Pajuelo, J.G. Caudal Region Regeneration in a Natural Population of the Morid Fish Physiculus cyanostrophus in the Tropical Eastern Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2019, 150, 103062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Somero, G.N.; Siebenaller, J.F. Inefficient Lactate Dehydrogenases of Deep-Sea Fishes. Nature 1979, 282, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, T.H.; Lai, N.C.; Graham, J.B.; Somero, G.N. Respiratory, Blood, and Heart Enzymatic Adaptations of Sebastolobus alascanus (Scorpaenidae; Teleostei) to the Oxygen Minimum Zone: A Comparative Study. Biol. Bull. 1992, 183, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Smith, K.L.; Hessler, R.R. Respiration of Benthopelagic Fishes: In Situ Measurements at 1230 Meters. Science 1974, 184, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Meek, R.P.; Childress, J.J. Respiration and the Effect of Pressure in the Mesopelagic Fish Anoplogaster cornuta (Beryciformes). Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abs. 1973, 20, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gordon, M.S.; Belman, B.W.; Chow, P.H. Comparative Studies on the Metabolism of Shallow-Water and Deep-Sea Marine Fishes. IV. Patterns of Aerobic Metabolism in the Mesopelagic Deep-Sea Fangtooth Fish Anoplogaster cornuta. Mar. Biol. 1976, 35, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Torres, J.J.; Belman, B.W.; Childress, J.J. Oxygen Consumption Rates of Midwater Fishes as a Function of Depth of Occureence. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1979, 26, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Smith, K.L.; Laver, M.B. Respiration of the Bathypelagic Fish Cyclothone acclinidens. Mar. Biol. 1981, 61, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Torres, J.J.; Somero, G.N. Metabolism, Enzymic Activities and Cold Adaptation in Antarctic Mesopelagic Fishes. Mar. Biol. 1988, 98, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Koslow, J.A. Energetic and Life-History Patterns of Deep-Sea Benthic, Benthopelagic and Seamount-Associated Fish. J. Fish Biol. 1996, 49, 54–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Childress, J.J. Are There Physiological and Biochemical Adaptations of Metabolism in Deep-Sea Animals? Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thuesen, E.V.; Childress, J.J. Enzymatic Activities and Metabolic Rates of Pelagic Chaetognaths: Lack of Depth-Related Declines. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1993, 38, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Thuesen, E.V.; Childress, J.J. Metabolic Rates, Enzyme Activities and Chemical Compositions of Some Deep-Sea Pelagic Worms, Particularly Nectonemertes mirabilis (Nemertea; Hoplonemertinea) and Poeobius meseres (Annelida; Polychaeta). Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1993, 40, 937–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thuesen, E.V.; Childress, J.J. Oxygen Consumption Rates and Metabolic Enzyme Activities of Oceanic California Medusae in Relation to Body Size and Habitat Depth. Biol. Bull. 1994, 187, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seibel, B.A.; Thuesen, E.V.; Childress, J.J.; Gorodezky, L.A. Decline in Pelagic Cephalopod Metabolism with Habitat Depth Reflects Differences in Locomotory Efficiency. Biol. Bull. 1997, 192, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Seibel, B.; Thuesen, E.; Childress, J. Light-Limitation on Predator-Prey Interactions: Consequences for Metabolism and Locomotion of Deep-Sea Cephalopods. Biol. Bull. 2000, 198, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Sutton, C.P.; Tracey, D.M.; Andrews, A.H.; Hart, A.C.; MacGibbon, D.J. Validated Age and Growth of Ribaldo (Mora Moro); New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2010/24; Ministry of Fisheries: Wellington, New Zealand, 2010.
Figure 1. (A) Habitus of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from the Emperor Seamounts (TL = 51.7 cm), (B,C) External appearance of its otoliths (photos by the authors).
Figure 1. (A) Habitus of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from the Emperor Seamounts (TL = 51.7 cm), (B,C) External appearance of its otoliths (photos by the authors).
Jmse 11 01212 g001
Figure 2. The sites (red circles) where otoliths of Lepidion schmidti in the waters of the Emperor Seamounts were collected.
Figure 2. The sites (red circles) where otoliths of Lepidion schmidti in the waters of the Emperor Seamounts were collected.
Jmse 11 01212 g002
Figure 3. Cross-sections of otoliths of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of Emperor Seamounts: (A)—TL 48.5 cm, 22 years; (B)—TL 61.5 cm, 31 years; (C)—TL 112 cm, 49 years (dots indicate annual growth zones, TL is total length).
Figure 3. Cross-sections of otoliths of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of Emperor Seamounts: (A)—TL 48.5 cm, 22 years; (B)—TL 61.5 cm, 31 years; (C)—TL 112 cm, 49 years (dots indicate annual growth zones, TL is total length).
Jmse 11 01212 g003
Figure 4. Size composition of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti in longline catches from off the Emperor Seamounts.
Figure 4. Size composition of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti in longline catches from off the Emperor Seamounts.
Jmse 11 01212 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti in longline catches from off the Emperor Seamounts by body weight.
Figure 5. Distribution of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti in longline catches from off the Emperor Seamounts by body weight.
Jmse 11 01212 g005
Figure 6. Relationship between body weight (W) and total length (TL) of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from longline catches in waters of the Emperor Seamounts.
Figure 6. Relationship between body weight (W) and total length (TL) of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from longline catches in waters of the Emperor Seamounts.
Jmse 11 01212 g006
Figure 7. Growth curves of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of the Emperor Seamounts calculated based on the VBGE.
Figure 7. Growth curves of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of the Emperor Seamounts calculated based on the VBGE.
Jmse 11 01212 g007
Figure 8. Specific growth rate of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of the Emperor Seamounts.
Figure 8. Specific growth rate of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of the Emperor Seamounts.
Jmse 11 01212 g008
Figure 9. Age composition of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti in the longline catches from the Emperor Seamounts waters.
Figure 9. Age composition of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti in the longline catches from the Emperor Seamounts waters.
Jmse 11 01212 g009
Table 1. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values for different growth functions of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from the Emperor Seamounts waters (maximum AIC values are given in bold).
Table 1. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values for different growth functions of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from the Emperor Seamounts waters (maximum AIC values are given in bold).
FunctionAIC
Linear: TL = at + b3112.2
Power: TL = atb + c2742.1
VBGE: T L = L ( 1 e k t t 0 ) 3123.3
Logistic: T L = a 1 + b e c t 2856.2
Gompertz: T L = a e b e c t 2907.6
Table 2. Parameters of the VBGE and linear function for males and females of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of the Emperor Seamounts.
Table 2. Parameters of the VBGE and linear function for males and females of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti from waters of the Emperor Seamounts.
SexVBGELinear
Lkt0R2abR2
All specimens examined2225.30.0007−6.20.71.415.50.7
Males984.50.0017−5.00.71.69.70.7
Females2758.60.0006−6.40.71.611.10.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korostelev, N.B.; Maltsev, I.V.; Orlov, A.M. First Data on the Age and Growth of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti (Moridae) from Waters of the Emperor Seamounts (Northwestern Pacific). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061212

AMA Style

Korostelev NB, Maltsev IV, Orlov AM. First Data on the Age and Growth of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti (Moridae) from Waters of the Emperor Seamounts (Northwestern Pacific). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(6):1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korostelev, Nikolai B., Igor V. Maltsev, and Alexei M. Orlov. 2023. "First Data on the Age and Growth of Schmidt’s cod Lepidion schmidti (Moridae) from Waters of the Emperor Seamounts (Northwestern Pacific)" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11, no. 6: 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop