Choosing the phytoremediation technologies for cleaning various types of wastewater
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.200591Keywords:
environmental safety, phytoremediation and its technologies, higher aquatic plantsAbstract
A methodological approach has been devised for determining the priority phytoremediation technology for the treatment of wastewater from settlements, based on the hierarchy analysis method (MAI). The proposed approach makes it possible to involve experts from municipal authorities of a settlement to substantiate decisions on managing the environmental safety of surface water bodies adjacent to the selected settlements.
The criteria (groups of factors) have been proposed, which reflected the input and output parameters of a treatment system, conditions at a construction site of treatment plants, and the requirements for phytoremediation technologies. Experts in various professional aspects gave their judgments regarding the priority of advantages of the mentioned criteria. The multidisciplinary experts’ judgments, which reflected the specific features of phytoremediation and the conditions for a would-be location of treatment plants, processed according to the scientifically based MAI procedure, formed the basis for decision-making on the choice of a priority phytoremediation technology under specific conditions.
The advantages of the proposed methodological approach include a possibility to link the entire array of the necessary information to a single algorithm for substantiating a solution. The information differs both in its content (environmental, biological, urban planning, social and economic) and in the form of its representation (the data on direct measurements, statistical and forecast estimates).
The proposed methodological approach has been tested based on an example of choosing the phytoremediation technologies for treatment plants at three different types of facilities such as an industrial enterprise, a residential building, and a city hospital. The obtained results demonstrated an acceptable level of conformity, which testifies to their reliability.
The devised methodological approach is useful for making managerial decisions on the choice of technology for the phytoremediation at treatment plants in order to substantiate their improvement or to build new plantsReferences
- Beans, C. (2017). Core Concept: Phytoremediation advances in the lab but lags in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (29), 7475–7477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707883114
- Dmitrieva, O. O., Teliura, N. O., Vasilenko, V. P. (2018). Implementation environmentally safe wastewater as an element of sustainable human settlements development Ukraine. Municipal economy of cities, 7 (146), 174–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2018-7-146-174-179
- Arthur, E. L., Rice, P. J., Rice, P. J., Anderson, T. A., Baladi, S. M., Henderson, K. L. D., Coats, J. R. (2005). Phytoremediation – An Overview. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24 (2), 109–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590952496
- Comín, F. A., Sorando, R., Darwiche-Criado, N., García, M., Masip, A. (2014). A protocol to prioritize wetland restoration and creation for water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds. Ecological Engineering, 66, 10–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.059
- Verhoeven, J. T. A. (2014). Wetlands in Europe: Perspectives for restoration of a lost paradise. Ecological Engineering, 66, 6–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.03.006
- Sumiahadi, A., Acar, R. (2018). A review of phytoremediation technology: heavy metals uptake by plants. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 142, 012023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/142/1/012023
- Ghanem, H., Chalak, L., Baydoun, S. (2019). Phytoremediation of Lebanese polluted waters: a review of current initiatives. MATEC Web of Conferences, 281, 03007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928103007
- Maiga, Y., von Sperling, M., Mihelcic, J. (2017). Constructed Wetlands. Global Water Pathogen Project. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/waterpathogens.66
- Morley, M. S., Vitorino, D., Behzadian, K., Ugarelli, R., Kapelan, Z., Coelho, S. T., Do Céu Almeida, M. (2015). Decision support system for the long-term city metabolism planning problem. Water Supply, 16 (2), 542–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.167
- Saaty, T. L., Ergu, D. (2015). When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14 (06), 1171–1187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962201550025x
- Saati, T. L. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy: Metod analiza ierarhiy. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 278. Available at: http://pqm-online.com/assets/files/lib/books/saaty.pdf
- Maksimenko, O., Pancheva, H., Madzhd, S., Pysanko, Y., Briankin, O., Tykhomyrova, T., Hrebeniuk, T. (2018). Examining the efficiency of electrochemical purification of storm wastewater at machinebuilding enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (10 (96)), 21–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.150088
- Isaienko, V., Madzhd, S., Pysanko, Y., Nikolaiev, K., Bovsunovskyi, E., Cherniak, L. (2019). Development of a procedure for determining the basic parameter of aquatic ecosystems functioning ‒ environmental capacity. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (97)), 21–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.157089
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Olena Dmitrieva, Irina Khorenzhaja, Valerie Vasylenko, Stanislav Osypenko, Natalia Teliura, Olga Lomakina, Liudmyla Melnik, Irina Koldoba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.
