Resumen
To obtain a better performance when modeling soil spectral data for attribute prediction, researchers frequently resort to data pretreatment, aiming to reduce noise and highlight the spectral features. Even with the awareness of the existence of dimensionality reduction statistical approaches that can cope with data sparse dimensionality, few studies have explored its applicability in soil sensing. Therefore, this study?s objective was to assess the predictive performance of two dimensionality reduction statistical models that are not widespread in the proximal soil sensing community: principal components regression (PCR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso). Here, these two approaches were compared with multiple linear regressions (MLR). All of the modelling strategies were applied without employing pretreatment techniques for soil attribute determination using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) and visible and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (Vis-NIR) data. In addition, the achieved results were compared against the ones reported in the literature that applied pretreatment techniques. The study was carried out with 102 soil samples from two distinct fields. Predictive models were developed for nine chemical and physical soil attributes, using lasso, PCR and MLR. Both Vis-NIR and XRF raw spectral data presented a great performance for soil attribute prediction when modelled with PCR and the lasso method. In general, similar results were found comparing the root mean squared error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) from the literature that applied pretreatment techniques and this study. For example, considering base saturation (V%), for Vis-NIR combined with PCR, in this study, RMSE and R2 values of 10.60 and 0.79 were found compared with 10.38 and 0.80, respectively, in the literature. In addition, looking at potassium (K), XRF associated with lasso yielded an RMSE value of 0.60 and R2 of 0.92, and in the literature, RMSE and R2 of 0.53 and 0.95, respectively, were found. The major discrepancy was observed for phosphorus (P) and organic matter (OM) prediction applying PCR in the XRF data, which showed R2 of 0.33 (for P) and 0.52 (for OM) without using pretreatment techniques in this study, and R2 of 0.01 (for P) and 0.74 (for OM) when using preprocessing techniques in the literature. These results indicate that data pretreatment can be disposable for predicting some soil attributes when using Vis-NIR and XRF raw data modeled with dimensionality reduction statistical models. Despite this, there is no consensus on the best way to calibrate data, as this seems to be attribute and area specific.