Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 15 segundos...
Inicio  /  Water  /  Vol: 8 Núm: 8 Par: 1 (2016)  /  Artículo
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Water Footprint of Milk Produced and Processed in South Africa: Implications for Policy-Makers and Stakeholders along the Dairy Value Chain

Enoch Owusu-Sekyere    
Morné Erwin Scheepers    
Henry Jordaan    

Resumen

The current water scarcity situation in South Africa is a threat to sustainable development. The present paper has assessed the water footprint of milk produced and processed in South Africa using the procedures outlined in the water footprint assessment manual. The results show that 1352 m3 of water is required to produce one tonne of milk with 4% fat and 3.3% protein in South Africa. The water used in producing feed for lactating cows alone accounts for 86.35% of the total water footprint of milk. The water footprint of feed ration for lactating cows is about 85% higher than that of non-lactating cows. Green water footprint accounts for more than 86% of the total water footprint of feed ration for lactating cows. Green and blue water footprints are the highest contributors to the total water footprint milk production in South Africa. Water used for feed production for both lactating and non-lactating cows accounts for about 99% of the total water footprint of milk production in South Africa. Particular attention should be given to feed crops with low water footprints and high contribution to dry matter to provide balanced ration with low water footprint. Water users, managers and livestock producers should pay attention to green and blue water consumption activities along the milk value chain and design strategies to minimize them. Corn, sorghum and lucerne production under irrigation in the greater Orange River basin is sustainable, whereas oats production for silage in the same catchment area is not sustainable. Our findings provide the rationale for dairy producers and water users in the dairy industry to get an understanding of the degree of sustainability of their input and output combinations, production choices, and policy interventions, in terms of water use.

 Artículos similares

       
 
István Waltner, Attila Ribács, Borbála Gémes and András Székács    
Our study aims to provide a look at how the production of dairy cattle is affecting water resources in Hungary. Utilizing the AquaCrop model and field data from a selected field in Hungary, we focused on the evapotranspiration (ET) and water footprint (W... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Zening Wu, Xiangyu Chen and Danyang Di    
In the article, on the basis of quantifying the emergy water ecological footprint, a sustainability evaluation system for the overall water ecological economic system of the basin and each province (region) was proposed. And using the subjective and obje... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Hua Zhu, Qing Zhang, Ligang Xu, Ying Liu, Yan Wang and Shuzhan Ma    
Understanding the relationship between the agricultural water footprint (AWF) and agricultural economic growth (AEG) is of great significance for promoting sustainable agriculture and regional economic development. In this study, we used agricultural sta... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Zhian Ye, Shaoxin Kang, Zhengjiang Wang, Qi Jiang, Jiangtao Zhang, Bin Zheng and Jinlei Wang    
The high-efficiency sedimentation tank has a wide range of application prospects in industrial wastewater treatment due to its small footprint, strong resistance to shock loads, and high efficiency. However, the complex flow field distribution inside sig... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Hegazy Rezk, A. G. Olabi, Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, Ali Alahmer and Enas Taha Sayed    
The use of green hydrogen as a fuel source for marine applications has the potential to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of the industry. The development of a sustainable and cost-effective method for producing green hydrogen has gained a lot of... ver más