Resumen
Structural equation models (SEM) are widely used in the social sciences. They model the relationships between latent variables in structural models, while defining the latent variables by observed variables in measurement models. Frequently, it is of interest to compare particular parameters in an SEM as a function of a discrete grouping variable. Multiple-group SEM is employed to compare structural relationships between groups. In this article, estimation approaches for the multiple-group are reviewed. We focus on comparing different estimation strategies in the presence of local model misspecifications (i.e., model errors). In detail, maximum likelihood and weighted least-squares estimation approaches are compared with a newly proposed robust Lp" role="presentation">????Lp
L
p
loss function and regularized maximum likelihood estimation. The latter methods are referred to as model-robust estimators because they show some resistance to model errors. In particular, we focus on the performance of the different estimators in the presence of unmodelled residual error correlations and measurement noninvariance (i.e., group-specific item intercepts). The performance of the different estimators is compared in two simulation studies and an empirical example. It turned out that the robust loss function approach is computationally much less demanding than regularized maximum likelihood estimation but resulted in similar statistical performance.