ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Ethic of responsibility and the future of nature

Miso Kulic    

Resumen

The question of science is the one that concerns the very foundations of our reality and, in addition to that, it is a question that deals not only with our natural reality, with what was once called the "natural nature", but also with social and technological reality produced by science itself, which for a long time now is our second nature. Science has become not only the instrument by which we try to understand the reality of nature, through the process of creating reality, forming and transforming nature, it has become the reality in which we live itself, and without which, as it seems, we could hardly go on living. However, even though science as an instrument for understanding reality has become the reality which we have produced ourselves, we are still, paradoxically enough, far from answering the essential question: What is science? Since the question of science is at the same time the one of the production of reality, it is obvious that the question "what is science?" does not amount to a self-evident question asked by a scientist regarding his scientific field. It is not only a question concerning the nature of scientific knowledge, or of scientific methods of scientific results achieved. What is at stake here is the insight concerning social and political usage of science, that the reality, which is produced by the sciences, reveals to us even in the forms of its deification, manipulation, ideologization and virtualization. Is persevering in its science-Enlightenment paradigm of human emancipation or does it, on the wave of critical self-reflection spanning all the way through the 20th century, more and more question, as Paul Feyerabend (Against Method) does, the extent of constraints imposed on free thought which it produces itself? Of course, the other side of the questioning itself belongs here too: scientific progress can be evaluated regardless of its consequences, of the dangerous threats it poses to our future: nuclear annihilation, ecological pollution or climate changes which endanger the survival of the living world ? 

 Artículos similares

       
 
Matthias Thiemann, Tim Büttner, Oliver Kessler     Pág. Finance an - 34
Starting with a landmark 2015 speech by Mark Carney on the ?Tragedy of the Horizon?, climate change entered central banking discourse, causing some of its key convictions to come under new scrutiny. This article traces how initially climate change was fi... ver más

 
Titus Suciu     Pág. 119 - 128
The fundamental analysis respond to the question: which company is best for investment? This article analyses six companies in the pharmaceutical sector that quotes at Bucharest Stock Exchange, from the point of view of fundamental analysis.  For in... ver más

 
Sicelo Cele,Celani J. Nyide,Lesley J. Stainbank    
AbstractOrientation: The sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in South Africa is important, mainly because of their contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) and their creation of work opportunities. The high rate of SME fai... ver más

 
Xueer Chen and Chao Wang    
E-commerce and FinTech are currently booming in China. The growing consumer market is accompanied by internet finance, by which consumers can easily borrow money from financial institutions online. As a result, the growing risks of financial institutions... ver más

 
Ben Marx,Ahmed Mohammadali-Haji,Peter A. Lansdell    
AbstractOrientation: The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) is anticipated to have a significant impact on the future generation of professional accountants. Accordingly, current and aspirant accountants are expected to acquire and develop soft ... ver más