Inicio  /  Building & Management  /  Vol: 2 Núm: 1 Par: 0 (2018)  /  Artículo
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

The expert with the justice = El perito con la justicia

Francisco Gil Carrillo    
Miguel Angel Hortelano Anguita    
Eduardo Caldentey Gallardo    

Resumen

The expert evidence is a transmission of information that the expert makes to the judge or to a third party, in the form of an opinion so that he can assess facts or relevant circumstances in a given process. It is regulated in the LEC [1] (January 7, 2000) in articles 335 and 352. Thus the expert is configured as that person who has specific knowledge of which the court lacks and that are necessary for a proper evaluation of the process. The expert is a subject that by definition must be extraneous to the process and to the facts [2] The expert must not possess legal knowledge but if he knows the protocol that is used in judiciary proceedings in which he intervenes, in addition to have the knowledge, at least of the specialty that proves with his title and that are accurate in the test. The expert must be aware of the importance of his work in the judicial process and the value of his evidence, which can unbalance the balance of justice, with the damages and benefits inherent in the respective parties.La prueba pericial es una transmisión de información que los perito realizan al juez o a un tercero, en forma de dictamen para que pueda valorar hechos o circunstancias relevantes en un determinado proceso. Se encuentra regulada en la LEC [1] (7 enero de 2000) en sus artículos 335 y 352. Así el perito se configura como aquella persona que dispone de conocimientos específicos de los que el tribunal carece y que resultan necesarios para una correcta evaluación del proceso. El perito es un sujeto que por definición previa debe ser ajeno al proceso y a los hechos [2]. El perito no debe de poseer conocimientos jurídicos, pero si conocer el protocolo que se utiliza en los procedimientos judiciales en los que interviene, además de tener conocimientos, al menos de la especialidad que acredite con su título y que sean precisos en la prueba [2]. El perito ha de ser consciente de la trascendencia que tiene su trabajo en el proceso judicial y el valor de su prueba, que puede desequilibrar la balanza de la justicia, con lo perjuicios y beneficios inherentes a las respetivas partes.

 Artículos similares

       
 
Qian Yang, Yueji Zhu and Fang Wang    
(1) Background: Rare empirical evidence has been explored concerning the ways in which training affects farmers? adoption of resource conservation technology in agricultural production. This study attempts to analyze the role of three factors, including ... ver más
Revista: Water

 
Darius Phiri, Matamyo Simwanda, Vincent Nyirenda, Yuji Murayama and Manjula Ranagalage    
Decision tree (DT) algorithms are important non-parametric tools used for land cover classification. While different DTs have been applied to Landsat land cover classification, their individual classification accuracies and performance have not been comp... ver más

 
Ganiyu Agbaje, Omowumi Alabi and Etim Offiong    
In Africa, there is growing knowledge regarding the use of data obtained by remote sensing and analysed while using Geographic Information Systems for solving myriad problems. The awareness has largely arisen through the efforts of the Programme on Space... ver más

 
João M. C. Estêvão    
The selection of a given method for the seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings is mostly dependent on the scale of the analysis. Results obtained in large-scale studies are usually less accurate than the ones obtained in small-scale studies. In th... ver más

 
Olayemi Bakre, Nirmala Dorasamy     Pág. 28 pages
Poor service delivery has always been considered a legacy of the apartheid era. However, 25 years into democracy, many local municipalities are still battling with service delivery backlogs. These backlogs are often attributed to, for example, dysfunctio... ver más