Resumen
Most current traffic safety evaluations using traffic conflict techniques are based on the principles of vehicle dynamics and kinematics. In these evaluations, a lack of consideration of the coupling mechanism among drivers, road users and the road environment leads to a large limitation in the practical application of such evaluations. In this paper, we firstly considered the driver characteristics in traffic conflicts and introduced the electric field model to establish the psychological field model of a driver in a conflict environment and to obtain the psychological field strength of the driver. Secondly, based on the classification criteria of traffic conflict severity, the psychological field strengths of drivers in different traffic conflict scenarios were categorized, and the range values of psychological field strengths of different severity levels were obtained. Finally, the analysis of the experimental results showed that the mean value and standard deviation of the drivers? mental field strengths were the largest in the opposite-direction conflict, indicating the largest dispersion of the field strengths; in the construction conflict, the mean value and standard deviation of the drivers? mental field strengths were the smallest, indicating the smallest dispersion of the field strengths.