|
|
|
|
|
Jacobus Philippus Le Roux,Nestor M. Gutiérrez,Luis Felipe Hinojosa,Viviana Pedroza,Juan Becerra
Pág. 657 - 669
Reply to Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacobus P. Le Roux,Néstor M. Gutiérrez,Luis F. Hinojosa,Viviana Pedroza,Juan Becerra
Pág. 580 - 588
We thank Finger et al. (2013) for their discussion of our paper and appreciate their honesty in retracting the proposed Late Miocene-Pliocene age for the Navidad Formation, due to misidentification of the foraminifer index species in question. In fact, a...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nestor M. Gutiérrez,Luis F. Hinojosa,Jacobus P. Le Roux,Viviana Pedroza
Pág. 66 - 78
The age of the Navidad Formation in central Chile has always been controversial, mainly due to the conflicting age ranges indicated by its macro- and microfossils. Macrofossils are generally interpreted as having been reworked from older, Early to Middle...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|