|
|
|
|
|
Jacobus Philippus Le Roux,Nestor M. Gutiérrez,Luis Felipe Hinojosa,Viviana Pedroza,Juan Becerra
Pág. 657 - 669
Reply to Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacobus P. Le Roux,Néstor M. Gutiérrez,Luis F. Hinojosa,Viviana Pedroza,Juan Becerra
Pág. 580 - 588
We thank Finger et al. (2013) for their discussion of our paper and appreciate their honesty in retracting the proposed Late Miocene-Pliocene age for the Navidad Formation, due to misidentification of the foraminifer index species in question. In fact, a...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nestor M. Gutiérrez,Luis F. Hinojosa,Jacobus P. Le Roux,Viviana Pedroza
Pág. 66 - 78
The age of the Navidad Formation in central Chile has always been controversial, mainly due to the conflicting age ranges indicated by its macro- and microfossils. Macrofossils are generally interpreted as having been reworked from older, Early to Middle...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis F. Hinojosa
Pág. 95 - 116
A reconstruction of the continental climate of southern South America, based on physiognomic analyses of fifteen taphofloras, coming mainly from Chile and Argentina, is presented here. Based on the climate estimates and the phytogeographical composition ...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|